Sadly, you can’t really call be too critical of her, because actual scientists and people in the know hold the same idiotic notions: Helena Christensen calls for action on climate change
The supermodel, who is a global ambassador for Oxfam, visited villages in the foothills of the Himalayas to see first hand the effect of floods and droughts on rural communities.
Gee, how’d she get there? On a jet airplane, by chance? Maybe a private plane? Aren’t they supposedly bad for the climate?
The Terai region is the most productive in Nepal but in recent years the area has suffered erratic weather patterns with more intense cold waves in the winter, followed by heavy burst of rain and lengthy droughts.
So, globull warming causes cold, drought, and rain.
Ms Christensen, who has also visited Peru with Oxfam to see the effects of extreme weather, blamed man made global warming.
She gets around, doesn’t she? I wonder what her “carbon footprint” is?
As ministers prepare to meet in Cancun, Mexico for the next round of climate change talks, she called for action to help poor people adapt the extreme weather events that are probably already caused by global warming.
And there are your pre-Cancun talking points, folks: it’s all for the poor, and turning every weather event into an “extreme” one. Anyhow, I bet the early snow and unusual early cold in Europe, including Helena’s home country of Holland is caused by greenhouse gases, or something.
Meanwhile, over at The Politico, they are worried about what will happen in Cancun, and take Obama to task for “not being up to the job.” Other than creating a massive carbon footprint himself, partying, playing golf, campaigning, and, oh, doing exactly the opposite of what the People want, what part of governance is Obama exactly “up to the job on”? He’s making Marie Antoinette look good in comparison.
Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU. sit back and Relax. we’ll dRive!
[…] Pirate’s Cove has a snow bunny and a list of Rule 5 links and personally, I think it’s the supermodel who is hot enough to cause the global warming. […]
Why didn’t the model say that we should be changing our bad habits, like our jobs and well being, for the children?? Surely she should know that just indicating that a few people will be adversely effected is not near as much of an impact as saying the children will be harmed.
Imagine the amount of money and carbon that could be saved if they would just let us have the raw data on the temperatures, as well as the sampling sites. We could then analyze the situation ourselves and begin backing the efforts if they are worthy. But then again, we do not have the ability to think and reason, we are the unwashed.
[…] Pirate’s Cove demonstrates the commonality between supermodels and Globull Warming. What? Oh, of course there’s a photo! […]