This is brutal (via Ace)
This is how the FBI destroys Hillary: The 10 questions that could end her White House dreams
These questions, if answered honestly, would most likely hand the Democratic nomination to Bernie SandersThe FBI’s upcoming interview of Hillary Clinton will be a turning point in the race for Democratic nominee, especially since Clinton won’t be able to speak to James Comey and his FBI agents in the same manner her campaign has communicated with the public. Unlike loyal Hillary supporters who view the marathon Benghazi hearings to be a badge of courage and countless prior scandals to be examples of exoneration, the FBI didn’t spend one year (investigating this email controversy) to give Clinton or her top aides parking tickets. They mean business, and lying to an FBI agent is a felony, so Hillary Clinton and her aides will be forced to tell the truth. The doublespeak involving convenience and retroactive classification won’t matter to seasoned FBI agents whose reputations are on the line; the entire country feels there’s a double-standard regarding this email controversy.
Imagine if you had 22 Top Secret emails on your computer?
Would you be able to claim negligence?
Also, the issue of negligence is a canard. Clinton and her top aides were smart enough to understand protocol. For every legal scholar saying that indictment isn’t likely (because it’s difficult to prove Clinton “knowingly†sent or received classified intelligence), there’s a former attorney general and former intelligence officials saying that indictment is justified.
Others were prosecuted for much, much less. David Patreaus kept a notebook and left it at home (which was wrong). Hillary created a server for her convenience despite being told “no” and all those pesky rules and laws. She sent government business through that server. The laws are quite clear.
Here’s a sample of those questions
- What was the political utility in owning a private server and never using a State.gov email address?
- Were all 31,830 deleted private emails about yoga?
- Why did you use a Blackberry that wasn’t approved by the NSA?
- Why were 22 Top Secret emails on a private server?
And this one
3. Why didn’t you know that intelligence could be retroactively classified?
This leads to the issue of negligence; a zero-sum proposition. Either Clinton wasn’t smart enough to know protocol, or breached protocol. Both scenarios aren’t good for a future presidency. Both scenarios won’t prevent legal repercussions, given the 22 Top Secret emails.
Hillary is supposed to be uber-smart, the smartest lady in the room. She should have known. She signed security clearance and material handling documents, at least going back to her time in the Senate. There’s no way she didn’t know, and certainly her staff would have known (and many would not have had the security clearances to view some of the information).
Who wrote this brutal takedown? That would be Salon. Yes, extreme-left Salon. Who are certainly Bernie supporters.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Here’s a partial list of essays by the author, H.A. Goodman:
I’m a Liberal Democrat. I’m Voting for Rand Paul in 2016. Here Is Why.
Bernie Sanders Has Earned His Success. Hillary Clinton Embodies White Privilege
Bernie Sanders Will Ban Private Prisons. Hillary Clinton Accepted $133,246 From Prison Lobbyists
Bernie Sanders Won Colorado and Beats Donald Trump by 5 More Points Than Clinton
The FBI’s Investigation of Clinton’s Emails Makes Bernie Sanders the True Democratic Front-Runner
33 Percent of Bernie Sanders Supporters Will Not Vote for Hillary Clinton. Here’s Why
Only Bernie Sanders Can Defeat Donald Trump on November 8, 2016
10 Reasons Caitlyn Jenner Is Absolutely Right About Hillary Clinton
White Privilege Helps Hillary Clinton Survive Controversy. Bernie Sanders Was Arrested in 1963
Bernie Sanders Won Michigan Because He’s Honest. More People Trust Trump Than Clinton
Why Did Hillary Clinton Need a Private Server? The Answer Makes Bernie Sanders President
Obama’s Justice Department Just Gave Bryan Pagliano Immunity and Bernie Sanders the Presidency
You’re right about one thing. The essay was brutal. Just not for the reasons you pretend.
Conservatives are fooling themselves if they believe that Mrs Clinton’s e-mail mess will lead to an indictment or otherwise derail her campaign. The Obama Administration would never, ever indict her, and the left just plain don’t care about this. We could have her, caught on tape, urinating on Chris Smith’s body and selling policy for cash, and the leftist idiots would still vote for her.
Well Dana it sounds like you think the majority of American voters are “leftist idiots”
Is this some sort of understated compliment?
I didn’t think you thought so highly of us !
Under our laws a person can not be forced to answer questions unless granted immunity
John wrote:
Barack Hussein Obama twice, twice! won a majority of the votes cast, so yes, at least in 2008 and 2012, the majority of voters were leftist idiots.
If there were an intelligence test required for voting, conservatives would win every election.