Weird: LA Non-profit Took Lots Of Taxpayer Money And Failed To Spend It

It’s almost like it is a horrendous idea to give tons of taxpayer money to private entities with zero oversight, who basically just enrich themselves

LA’s $87M taxpayer money mystery deepens as nonprofit backed by mayoral hopeful Nithya Raman faces spending scrutiny

surprise surprise surpriseAn LA nonprofit bankrolled with millions in taxpayer funds through mayoral candidate Nithya Raman’s eviction-defense program more than tripled its revenue in five years, even as reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged, a California Post investigation found.

The Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles (LAFLA) saw its annual revenue soar from $17.6 million in 2019 to $58.6 million in 2024, while its net assets doubled to nearly $44 million, according to its IRS returns.

But City Attorney Hydee Feldstein Soto’s office found that LAFLA’s reported housing and eviction-defense spending plunged from $17.6 million in 2022 to $4.4 million in 2024.

Feldstein Soto is now demanding a full audit, warning that $55 million to $87 million in city and county funding cannot be reconciled with the nonprofit’s public financial records.

Unfortunately, this is the norm. What isn’t normal is Government looking for accountability, so, I suspect Karen Bass might have something to do with siccing the LA Attorney’s Office on the LAFLA. Democrats should all remember that, sure, most of this graft and slush ends up in the hands of Democrat entities, with some being fed back to Democrat politicians, but, imagine what could be done if the money was actually spent wisely and on what it was supposed to be spent on.

Like Marco Rubio said, only about 20% of the money USAID dealt around actually went to the stated purpose. What if we spent all of it on the stated purpose? It also points out that spending could be cut tremendously and still get the job done.

Read: Weird: LA Non-profit Took Lots Of Taxpayer Money And Failed To Spend It »

If All You See…

…is horrible heatsnow from carbon pollution, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Pacific Pundit, with a post on “Ramaswamy ad causes crazy communist Amy Acton to ditch campaign event – claims she “lost her voice””

Read: If All You See… »

Feds Supposedly Have DNA That Proves Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother

This just got disturbingly hilarious. Of course, you won’t find this in places like the NY Times, Washington Post, and so many others

Feds have DNA evidence that could prove Ilhan Omar wed her brother, committed immigration fraud: sources

Federal prosecutors are planning to use DNA evidence to try to prove Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) committed immigration fraud, as part of the sprawling investigation into the congresswoman, sources told The Post.

People familiar with the years-long criminal probe said the feds have made use of whistleblowers, government records and now obtained DNA in an effort to substantiate decade-old allegations that Omar — and possibly members of her family like her father — defrauded immigration authorities.

One source said the DNA evidence was critical to proving an allegation that Omar married her brother when she wed Ahmed Nur Said Elmi in 2009 because she was trying to help him get a green card — which never came to fruition.

It’s unclear whether the DNA was taken before or after Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) searched the congresswoman’s home in Washington, DC, last Monday, when federal agents were seen exiting the bungalow with boxes marked “Seized Property Evidence.”

Two more indicated that the execution of the search warrant on Oct. 12, coupled with the DNA and additional evidence, has provided a solid basis to bring charges of conspiracy to commit some form of immigration fraud before a grand jury, stemming from the probe initiated by the Minnesota US Attorney’s Office.

Given the case is being pursued as a general conspiracy, the evidence will prove useful even if some of the acts fall outside of the statute of limitations.

“If you argue a conspiracy, you can allege overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy that are outside the statute of limitations,” said Neama Rahmini, a former federal prosecutor.

But, what is the crime? It is illegal under state laws to marry a direct family member, but, not federally.

Elmi, who divorced from Omar in 2017, reportedly applied and then withdrew his application for a marriage-based green card in 2019, when US Citizenship and Immigration Services asked for additional evidence about his marriage to her, according to The Washington Post.

But, it is illegal federally to marry someone for fraudulent immigration purposes. So, this could be just one more point of possible criminality in any trial of Ilhan. And the conspiracy part could get more in depth if Ilhan was actually 18 when her father received citizenship (which he never should have received, but, that’s a different story) and faked being 17.

DC US Attorney Jeanine Pirro is also investigating issues related to the congresswoman’s finances — including entries in House disclosures that resulted in Omar deflating her net worth by tens of millions of dollars in the last year due to an unexplained accounting “discrepancy.”

“That judge would not have signed that warrant unless there was probable cause,” Pirro told Fox News. “If there was a crime committed, it will be prosecuted.”

Really, that is the one which could end up being the big deal. If there is evidence of fraud, if there is a link to the fraud in Minnesota, that could put her in jail while the whole sordid affair of her immigration status is adjudicated to the point that her citizenship is stripped and then she gets deported after serving jail time.

Read: Feds Supposedly Have DNA That Proves Ilhan Omar Married Her Brother »

Your Fault: California To Maybe Possibly We Think Lose A Lot Of Beachfront

In the future, of course

Major loss of California beaches predicted in latest climate forecast

As ocean levels rise, waves crash farther inland and the coast continues to crumble, Southern California is on track to lose 30 to 70% of its beaches over the next several decades. Almost half of all beach cliffs are likely to retreat by 30 to 80 feet by 2100. And a 1.6-foot increase in sea level rise by 2060 will leave low-lying coastal areas including the ports, Santa Monica, Venice and Redondo beaches particularly vulnerable to floods and storms, with one estimate predicting 15,000 people exposed in Los Angeles County.

Those are just some of the dire findings in California’s Fifth Climate Change Assessment, a state-commissioned report that comes out every several years and details how climate change is expected to affect everything from public health to animal habitat to central touchstones of the California way of life.

“There are things in there that are hard to digest, and hard to wrap our heads around,” said Abby Edwards, senior deputy director for the Governor’s Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation, which led the assessment. “I just hope that this can be a call to action to make sure we are still really doubling down on all of our climate mitigation goals.”

Let’s see:

Santa Monica (which would cover Venice, as well, since so close): .36 feet since 1983

Redondo Beach is halfway between Santa Monica and the LA station, which shows .17 feet since 1983

We aren’t going to get 1.6 feet of rise in 34 years. More like another 150-200 years, if things continue the way they’ve been. This is all doomsaying for money and and government controlling citizen’s lives.

I’m not digging the change to the NOAA website, especially since no longer seems to have international data, and it really doesn’t have the historical tide gauge data. The probably removed it as it is even more inconvenient.

Read: Your Fault: California To Maybe Possibly We Think Lose A Lot Of Beachfront »

NYC Pitches Snit Fit At Private Companies Using AI Chatbots

It’s always some type of government controlling private companies with these Democrats

Customer Service Chatbots Must Be Stopped

Press 1 if you’ve heard this story before. Press 2 if it has happened to you.

After a recent trip, I noticed several mysterious charges on my hotel bill. Certain I hadn’t raided the minibar, I went hunting for a customer service number to get an explanation. I searched and I searched. Nothing. Instead, all I could find was an offer for a “live chat” blinking in the bottom-right corner of my phone screen. I gave it a try.

Three dots danced. A friendly name appeared. Cheerful pleasantries were exchanged. I began explaining my problem until an F.A.Q. menu suddenly interrupted me. That’s when I realized I had been communicating with a chatbot all along.

I had stumbled into the digital labyrinth — a veritable Hotel California, and I was just a prisoner of my own device. I explained my predicament. I re-explained it, supplying information it already seemed to have, answering prompts that had little to do with the the question I was asking, and rebuffing discount codes and propositions to book another stay. At one point, I pleadingly typed a single word in all caps: HUMAN. The machine whirred, ignoring me.

As I floundered, I found myself reflecting on the future of customer service. Based on my 25-minute ordeal, I began to suspect that the chatbot was not designed to solve my problem. It seemed to be designed to test how much friction customers would tolerate — how much information we would provide to train future models — before giving up. What the chatbot probably didn’t know was that this customer is in a position to fight back.

Yeah, this happens with real humans, as well. Since late December 2025 I’ve dealt with it twice: 1st trying to order a knockoff guitar, went back and forth to the point I threatened to put in a dispute with my credit card company, and then did. And the CC company found in my favor within 24 hours. Another involved an app which connects to something I use a lot, wasn’t working, all I wanted was it to work and, heck, they could reimburse $10. There’s a lot more to this, but, the multiple people involved were atrocious (one didn’t even know their own product), and ended with me typing a letter, putting it in an envelope, and mailing it. That’s how PO’d I was. Finally got 2 months free and an apology.

In my job as commissioner of the New York City Department of Consumer and Worker Protection, I hear similar complaints from New Yorkers of every stripe. Automated customer service systems tasked with handling our data and money are driving us crazy. Whether you’re trying to return a purchase, cancel a subscription or recover a hacked account, getting actual help requires a Homeric quest past a morass of junk. (blah blah blah)

Today, New York City is going a step further, proposing some of the most rigorous rules in the nation to protect customers against automated doom loops, including automated voice systems and chatbots. Our proposal is simple: Companies can still use A.I. and other automated tools, but they need to tell consumers when they are communicating with a chatbot — and make it much easier to reach a human being.

Companies whose chatbots and automated voice systems mislead people, leave them stuck without help or only pretend to offer support would face significant penalties, with fines per violation (per customer) ranging from $525 for a first-time offender up to $3,500. Reminder: There are roughly 8.6 million people living in New York City, according to the latest census.

Of course they’re doing this, and those fines will be based on very subjective standards. And Samuel A.A. Levine hopes this becomes a template for cities everywhere, because Leftists love government controlling the private sector. A lot of the time simply because they had a poor experience.

Read: NYC Pitches Snit Fit At Private Companies Using AI Chatbots »

Warmists Just Can’t Let Go Of Climate Scam Film “Digger”

Yes, yes this is the perfect climate scam movie. It failed. Even Warmists aren’t interested in seeing it

Tom Cruise’s Digger is a commercial flop – but also the perfect climate film for our time

Digger, the new Alejandro González Iñárritu film, is bombastic, misanthropic and an epic, critically savaged flop. It is also the near-perfect climate change film for our era.

Digger Rockwell, the eponymous protagonist played by Tom Cruise, is a bluntly caricatured Texas oilman blase about the environmental ruin of his drilling, even as it triggers a disastrous splitting of the Arctic ice sheet. This causes a vast iceberg, five times the size of Washington DC, to barrel towards Europe and threaten a devastating tsunami.

Much like this impending disaster and the real-world retreat of glaciers and coral reefs, though, the mere act of watching Digger has become a forlorn race against time. The box office failure has been resounding, and Digger’s time on the big screen has been brief.

Facing a predicted $245m loss – the lavishly made film took $8m in its first weekend in the US before dropping 60% for its second – Digger was yanked from more than 2,500 theatres across the US ahead of its third week. Scrambling to find a single cinema showing Digger, I had to resort to spending a Thursday lunchtime with just two other ticket-buying patrons at a major Manhattan venue.

No one cares. Literally no one cares. The movie has only made a bit over $17 million. A Tom Cruise movie. Even he couldn’t get climate cultists to come see it. Hope he took pay upfront instead of the points.

It’s striking that the possible end of a habitable planet has spawned comparatively little art with only vague nods, if at all, to our culpability. Among movies, there was Waterworld, another flop where Kevin Costner had to drink his own urine on a world flooded by the melted ice caps, and The Day After Tomorrow, where the melting ice causes a storm that plunges society into a new ice age.

Cult.

Read: Warmists Just Can’t Let Go Of Climate Scam Film “Digger” »

If All You See…

…is a rising ocean encroaching on the land, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is neo-neocon, with a post on “Elyssa Slotkin isn’t hiding her intent”

Read: If All You See… »

Huh: Media Upset Legal Alien Voted And Is In Big Trouble

Unsurprisingly, a California poll worker helped enable the fraud

Immigrant, 68, says an election worker gave him a ballot. Feds say he voted illegally

Kamlesh Shah, an elderly immigrant from India with a heart condition, moves shakily and uses a cane to get around his shared apartment in a senior living facility in Sacramento’s south Land Park neighborhood in Northern California.

On Monday, Shah felt particularly dizzy and unwell as he came to the realization he was the subject of federal prosecution and at the red-hot center of an increasingly tense debate between California and federal officials over the security of the state’s elections.

“I can hardly walk and talk,” Shah, who is 68, said. “Now I have to face these charges.”

In November 2024, inspired by the presidential campaign of former Vice President Kamala Harris, decided to see whether a new driver’s license and his ongoing application for citizenship meant he could cast a vote for the first time in his three-decades of living in the United States. He visited a Sacramento County polling place and handed over his identification. An election worker gave him the OK and a ballot, Shah told The Sacramento Bee.

So he cast a vote. He has not cast one since. A ballot, the one California sends to all its registered voters, sat unopened in his apartment on Monday.

He knew he wasn’t supposed to vote and yet still went to the polls to vote, and the idiot poll worker illegally gave him a ballot and then he voted. And the People’s Republik of California considers him registered and send him ballots, which puts the notion that California is doing what it is supposed to do to keep non-citizens from voting. Again, what these Democrat paradises do is allow alien (that’s both legal and illegal people) voting for state, county, and local politicians and issues, which means they get ballots which include federal politicians, often with an admonition that they cannot mark those positions wink wink.

On Nov. 15, U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents visited Shah, he said, and asked him about voting in that election. They told him the federal government was going to seek to cancel his application for citizenship, because he’d voted illegally.

On Friday, he received a notice to appear in the U.S. District Court in Sacramento on Nov. 6. He was charged with voting as an alien in a federal election, a misdemeanor charge that carries penalties of as much as a year in prison or a fine as high as $100,000. Shah falsely declared himself a U.S. citizen on Nov. 5 when he cast his ballot, according to the complaint against him. (snip)

“It was a really big mistake,” Shah said. “I’m really nervous and really upset.”

Yeah, well, he knew it was a mistake from the get-go, but, he surely thought he would get away with it. But, of course, the article is a sniffle piece, trying to make you feel bad for the aliens who illegally vote

10 indicted for illegally voting in North Carolina as non-citizens: Federal prosecutors

Ten people have been indicted for illegally voting in North Carolina as non-citizens, the United States Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of North Carolina said Thursday.

According to prosecutors, the following individuals are accused of falsely claiming to be United States citizens to register and vote:

Germany (a bunch of them), Jamaica, Canada, Haiti, Panama, Yugoslavia, and El Salvador, and the Democratic run administrations allowed many to register. They all knew they weren’t supposed to, so, of course the Raleigh News and Observer, who ran the first article (why is a local paper running pieces on California?) asked the criminals what their thoughts were

After a grand jury indicted a handful of voters in North Carolina on federal charges of illegally voting as a noncitizen, some of the defendants, who are longtime legal residents of the country, had strong words to share in response.

“It’s just jacked up,” Lawton McKenzie, a Wayne County resident originally from Jamaica, told reporters outside the courthouse on Thursday.

Yeah, well, if your license gets suspended for failing to stop for a school bus that’s on you, right?

McKenzie said he voted after receiving an invitation in the mail to register.

“If y’all mail stuff out to people and y’all send people out to come and sign up — that’s entrapment,” he said, noting that he showed his permanent resident card as identification when he registered to vote.

As a permanent resident he 100% knew he was not eligible to vote, it’s right there in the law, regardless of being sent anything.

Read: Huh: Media Upset Legal Alien Voted And Is In Big Trouble »

EU Parliament Votes To “Confront” Muslim Brotherhood

I mean, it’s something, but, what is it really?

European Parliament votes to confront Muslim Brotherhood, ‘Islamist entryism’ in overwhelming vote

Following the sanctioning of foreign Muslim Brotherhood groups by the Trump administration, the European Parliament recently took its own action against the transnational radical Islamist group.

As Europe begins to respond to the threat of radical Islam across the continent, an overwhelming majority of the European Parliament voted for a resolution that condemned the Muslim Brotherhood and its actions.

European Parliament member Céline Imart of France, who sponsored the resolution, called the vote “a historic victory because it is a European first. For the first time, Europe has voted on a text that tackles Islamist entryism and the Muslim Brotherhood.”

Imart posted on X that she had “broken a taboo that Europe has been dragging around like a chain: this victory signifies a major doctrinal shift in the institutions… We were able to transcend partisan divides on a major issue for our societies and our youth.”

It’s a start, but, will they actually ban the MB? They should

A press release on the resolution issued by the European Parliament’s news website stated that Islamist entryism targets “democratic institutions, the rule of law, equality between women and men and fundamental freedoms.” It stressed that Muslim citizens must be protected from discrimination as “a democratic obligation,” while “warning against treating organized Islamist networks as representative interlocutors.”

The release also stated, “While Europe must remain free, open and faithful to its principles, it can ‘no longer fund, consult or legitimize networks that use its language, procedures and funding to weaken its values from within,’” but “MEPs stress that anti-discrimination policies must not be used to shield Islam from criticism or legitimize organized Islamist networks.”

So Muslims bad but must also be protected. Do they understand that this is the same weeny language that has allowed the hardcore Muslims to infiltrate Western nations?

Read: EU Parliament Votes To “Confront” Muslim Brotherhood »

BTW, The French Riots Are Your Fault

There is no one surprised by this revelation from the cult of climastrology, right?

How the Climate Crisis Fueled the Youth Protests Roiling France

By the time Cléo made it to Greek class, she had gone completely pale. It was a Wednesday in June during France’s second consecutive heat wave this year, and the 16-year-old was struggling to cope with the rising temperatures.

She pushed through, thinking she was just tired. But the following day at her sweltering high school on the eastern edge of Paris, nausea and a desperate thirst gripped her. The school nurse, recognizing the signs of heat exhaustion, told her to go home.

This week, as she recalled the experience and worried about more heat waves to come, Cléo and her friends stood by a pile of green garbage cans, blocking their school’s entrance. For the past four weeks, scenes like this have multiplied at thousands of schools across France, where students are protesting to demand better learning conditions and more investment in public education.

The peasants become reliant on Government handouts, and get upset when there aren’t more or some are cut back. Bread and circuses.

The students’ demands are far-ranging: more teachers, smaller class sizes, a shortened school day and an overhaul of the post-secondary college application system. But the heart of the revolt is indignation over crumbling school infrastructure—a problem laid bare by climate-change-fueled heat waves.

This year was France’s hottest on record, and the country counted 8,000 excess deaths during the summer’s heat waves. In June alone, deaths spiked 11% compared to the same month in 2025.

France’s schools, meanwhile, were not built for the hotter world the students have inherited after generations of fossil fuel use have warped the climate. Many buildings were designed to hold onto heat; air conditioning is rare. As classrooms recorded temperature peaks above 100 degrees Fahrenheit this spring, schools reported incidents from fainting to nosebleeds.

Finding a way to link anything that happens to the climate cult is rather culty.

The protesting students aren’t focused on air conditioning. Instead, many say they know the heat doesn’t start and end in the classroom, and it will follow them long after they graduate.

Many of them cite climate change as a source of anxiety about their future, alongside concerns about the economy and how artificial intelligence will affect their job prospects.

The kiddies have been taught to be emotional messes, all because of doomsday cult beliefs.

Read: BTW, The French Riots Are Your Fault »

Pirate's Cove