Unshockingly, NY Times Links Avalanches With Hotcoldwetdry

By William Teach February 20, 2026 – 7:15 am

Have watched any of the webcams from the California mountains? Good grief, I’ve been watching for days, and they are wild. Places like Truckee, Big Bear, Tahoe, Mammoth Mountain, and more. Some of the cameras have actually gone done because of the snow. The Donner Pass one had it’s battery go tits up. And, of course, we have

Because of that we get

Warming Climate Can Increase Avalanche Risk, Studies Show

stop global warmingCalifornia’s Sierra Nevada is being pummeled this week by a series of storms that is headed to Colorado and prompting avalanche warnings across the Rocky Mountains.

While scientists are careful not to blame climate change for any single weather event without close study, research suggests that a warming climate is increasing the overall risk of avalanches at higher elevations, as storms dump large amounts of snow that can overload and tumble down a mountain slope.

Authorities in California have not pinpointed the precise cause of the Tuesday avalanche that killed at least eight backcountry skiers in a remote region near Lake Tahoe. However, they are pointing to a combination of heavy snow on top of an unstable snow pack as conditions that led to the avalanche.

Climate scientists are identifying a paradox about snowfall, avalanche risk and a warming climate, namely that drier, warmer winters will occur in the West — but more snow is expected to fall at higher elevations.

Sigh. Did warming cause an avalanche in Norway in 1679 that killed 55? During the Little Ice Age? A lot of old avalanches weren’t really a big deal, because not a lot of people lived in areas that would get them. Did warming cause one in 1970 that killed at least 30,000? Oh, that was an earthquake. Which I’m sure the cult would link to warming. Just like they say that research “suggests”. That is not science. Suggest means “I don’t really know, but, I’m going to Blamestorm anyhow.”

Anyway, good grief! I don’t think dogs would be too happy

Heck, many ski resorts had to close. Can you imagine that? Not being able to ski because there is too much snow?

Read: Unshockingly, NY Times Links Avalanches With Hotcoldwetdry »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | No Comments | Trackback URL

Democrats Want To Go Back To “Old Immigration Polices” To Fund DHS

By William Teach February 20, 2026 – 7:00 am

Democrats would prefer that illegals are not detained and deported, and that they can simply cross the border willy nilly

Trump’s immigration crackdown is brewing a health care crisis in the US, doctors warn

As they seek to curb President Donald Trump’s aggressive approach to immigration enforcement, congressional Democrats are looking to formalize some guidelines previous administrations used.

Of the 10 policy proposals Democratic leaders offered in negotiations to reopen the Department of Homeland Security, which has been in a funding lapse since Feb. 14 in the midst of widespread uproar over the fatal shootings of two U.S. citizens by immigration officers in Minneapolis last month, seven have been employed in at least some form by previous administrations.

Democrats are asking the Trump administration to reinstate policies it has rejected in its controversial push to carry out mass deportations. Prior policies Democrats want to formalize include use-of-force standards, allowing unannounced visits by members of Congress to facilities that detain immigrants and obtaining judicial warrants before entering private residences.

“Many of the things the Democrats are asking for are to revert to prior policies,” said Theresa Cardinal Brown, a senior DHS official during the George W. Bush and Barack Obama administrations. “Some of them are responding to the ways this administration is carrying out its operations that previous administrations did not.”

Republicans should offer a few concessions, so we can go back to Obama’s policy of catch and deport with no hearings. Seriously, for most of the time we’ve had an immigration system that’s the way it worked. Ever watched Cheech and Chong’s Up In Smoke?

Pedro de Pacas: Don’t worry, man. Those aren’t narcs, they’re Las Emigras; you know, the Immigration Service looking for illegal aliens.
Anthony Stoner: What’s the Immigration Service doing here, man?
Pedro de Pacas: My cousin needed a ride to his brother’s wedding in Tijuana; so he called the Emigras, man. They’ll deport the entire wedding party, man. They get a free bus ride across the border and lunch. When the wedding is over, man, they’ll just come back across the border.

Yeah, immigration would simply catch, put on a bus, and say hasta la vista. It may have been a movie, but, that was the reality. I think Obama really liked that.

Anyhow, of course they want to ban masks and require immigration officials to identify themselves by name and number, making it much easier to harass them and their families. Protect “sensitive” locations, which will end up pretty much everywhere if Dems have their way. Stop racial profiling, which would really mean ICE would be unable to detain any Latino.

Change use of force, which would make it damned near impossible for ICE to do their job. Give state and local officials the ability to have “oversight” over federal immigration officials in a way they don’t for every single other federal law enforcement agency, which would lead to prosecutions willy nilly, making LEOs not want to do their jobs. Restrict the use of body cameras so they can’t be used to track the wackjob Dem voters who attack ICE. And not allowing anything more than standard uniforms like with civil law enforcement.

It’s all designed to utterly kneecap federal immigration.

Read: Democrats Want To Go Back To “Old Immigration Polices” To Fund DHS »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

Can ‘Climate Change’ Be Humorous?

By William Teach February 19, 2026 – 3:00 pm

No.

Eh, I guess I should write more. The people who believe that anthropogenic climate change is going to destroy everything are wackadoodle, though

Can climate change be humorous? Erb Institute hosts climate comedian Stuart Goldsmith to discuss fear, hope and action

Hundreds of Ann Arbor community members, University of Michigan students and faculty gathered at Robertson Auditorium Thursday evening for a comedy show by British comedian Stuart Goldsmith about climate change hosted in collaboration with the Erb Institute. The Erb Institute is a partnership between the Ross School of Business and the School for Environment and Sustainability, with a goal of using business to promote sustainability.

Goldsmith is a stand-up comedian who performs globally to raise awareness for the climate crisis and create hope around climate anxiety. This performance highlighted issues such as fast fashion, inefficiencies in raising cattle and the environmental impact of artificial intelligence.

Wait, did they say “performs globally”? That would require lots and lots of fossil fueled travel, right?

In an interview with The Michigan Daily, Carmen Quinonez, Erb Institute director of programs, said the event’s goal was to encourage a sense of community and hope during a time when the weight of solving climate change is heavy.

“I think folks who work to mitigate climate change and who are focused on climate — it can be very serious and often feel like you have a responsibility to save the world,” Quinonez said. “I think one of our goals with bringing Stuart in is to just remind us all that we’re also not alone in fighting climate change.”

Goldsmith opened his discussion about climate change by acknowledging hypocrisy that exists within the field, referencing how he flies around the world to perform.

You don’t say.

“I don’t think you can guilt people,” Goldsmith said. “If we all wait until we lead a perfectly guilt-free, carbon-free life before we dare to have an opinion on the climate crisis, this is called the purity test; the idea that you don’t deserve a voice unless you’re perfect. I think that’s nonsense, and it plays into the hands of the polluters.”

None of the Warmists I’ve seen have any guilt about having massive carbon footprints while trying to force everyone else to be forced to have a low carbon footprint.

Goldsmith then discussed the harmful impacts of consuming beef on the environment. He suggested that everyone should be vegan, while joking that he would never do it.

“We need you to be vegan,” Goldsmith said. “Everyone has to be vegan. We know that. We know that we have to be vegan. We know what an impact they can make on the climate. We know that we have to be vegan. I’m not, f— that, but you should be.”

After audience laughter calmed down, he said limiting beef consumption is an alternative to fully committing to veganism.

Huh? Was that funny? I mean, the rest of it looks like a lecture, not a comedy show. I tried a few of his videos, like this, couldn’t find it anything but naggy. This is funny

Read: Can ‘Climate Change’ Be Humorous? »

Posted in AGW Idiocy, Global Warming | 1 Comment | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach February 19, 2026 – 1:48 pm

…are mountains that will soon be snow free, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The Hayride, with a post on Dogs vs Muslims.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

Report: US Could Launch Sustained Strike Against Iran Within Days

By William Teach February 19, 2026 – 10:30 am

I don’t know about this, but, the news is all over

Trump could launch ‘sustained’ attack on Iran within days after US military’s ‘unprecedented’ Middle East buildup

A massive US military buildup in the Middle East suggests the US could be ready to launch a “sustained” bombing campaign on Iran in weeks — or even days — should Tehran continue refusing President Donald Trump’s demands in ongoing negotiations.

With a second aircraft carrier en route to the region and a flood of hundreds of strike, support, and other aircraft already nearby, the sheer scale of forces now positioned in the region alone is highly unusual — and unprecedented in recent decades, former Pentagon official and Atlantic Council fellow Alex Plitsas told The Post.

“What we have amassed is an unprecedented size combination of land-based attack aircraft, command and control and sea-based platforms,” he said. “We haven’t seen a buildup like this in this region in decades.”

While last year’s Operation Midnight Hammer took just 25 minutes to strike Iran’s nuclear facilities, a new campaign could last days to weeks, US officials told The Post.

The deployment — including carrier strike groups, land-based aircraft, refueling tankers and command-and-control assets — gives Trump the option to launch what Plitsas described as a sustained air and naval campaign without committing US ground troops.

And

US military prepared to strike Iran as early as this weekend, but Trump has yet to make a final call, sources say

The US military is prepared to strike Iran as early as this weekend, though President Donald Trump has yet to make a final decision on whether he’ll authorize such actions, sources familiar with the matter tell CNN.

The White House has been briefed that the military could be ready for an attack by the weekend, after a significant buildup in recent days of air and naval assets in the Middle East, the sources said. But one source cautioned that Trump has privately argued both for and against military action and polled advisers and allies on what the best course of action is.

And

That keeps going on and on. But, is it real at this point? Or is the Trump admin releasing “anonymous” information in order to sway Iran to stop being, well, Iran. To stop with the terrorism, stop trying to build nuclear weapons, stop abusing its own citizens, etc and so forth? If a strike was really a possibility soon do you think the Trump admin would be leaking? Whomever leaked would certainly be easily identified, as there wouldn’t be a lot of people involved. And then fired if Trump didn’t want a leak.

But, I guess we’ll see. And then we’ll see Democrats take the side of Iran.

Read: Report: US Could Launch Sustained Strike Against Iran Within Days »

Posted in Iran | 7 Comments | Trackback URL

Butthurt: Wackos Sue Over Trump Pulling Climate Scam Messages From National Parks

By William Teach February 19, 2026 – 7:15 am

There was no law requiring the messages, so, what’s the problem?

Groups sue over Trump effort to ‘erase’ history, science in national parks

A coalition of scientific, preservation and historical groups on Tuesday sued the Trump administration, arguing that the removal of information about civil rights, climate change and other topics at multiple national parks amounts to illegal censorship.

“Censoring science and erasing America’s history at national parks are direct threats to everything these amazing places, and our country, stand for,” Alan Spears, senior director of cultural resources for the National Parks Conservation Association, said in a statement announcing the filing. “As Americans, we deserve national parks that tell stories of our country’s triumphs and heartbreaks alike. We can handle the truth.”

Tuesday’s lawsuit, filed in a federal court in Massachusetts, argues that in its haste to carry out President Donald Trump’s order, the Interior Department has ignored well-established principles and legal requirements when seeking to overhaul information presented at national parks.

“The orders and resulting implementation actions ignore Congress’s mandate for how the parks must be managed; erase the history of countless people and communities from public spaces; limit the availability of scientific information relevant to ensuring the long-term preservation of the parks themselves; and impair the mission of the National Park Service to preserve the parks ‘for the enjoyment, education, and inspiration of this and future generations,’” the legal complaint states.

The suit really mentions zero laws requiring these messages, only the Administrative Procedure Act, saying the silly messages were removed without going through a long, stupid process. How much of a process did the messages go through to be put up? For the most part, none of them are necessary. Just let people go to the parks without cult preaching. Remember this?

Glacier National Park is replacing signs that predicted its glaciers would be gone by 2020

The signs at Glacier National Park warning that its signature glaciers would be gone by 2020 are being changed.

The signs in the Montana park were added more than a decade ago to reflect climate change forecasts at the time by the US Geological Survey, park spokeswoman Gina Kurzmen told CNN. (snip)

But the glacier warning isn’t being removed entirely, she told CNN. Instead, the new signs will say: “When they will completely disappear depends on how and when we act. One thing is consistent: the glaciers in the park are shrinking.

So, a failed prognostication so they just said “it’s going to happen sometime.” We don’t need this crap.

Read: Butthurt: Wackos Sue Over Trump Pulling Climate Scam Messages From National Parks »

Posted in Climate Cult, Global Warming | 4 Comments | Trackback URL

Immigrants Are Helping NC And We Totally Need A Fair Immigration System Or Something

By William Teach February 19, 2026 – 7:00 am

What a wonderful photo. It’s like Democrats think illegals are only around to pick food, do their lawns, and serve them. From the link

North Carolina is one of the nation’s most attractive migration destinations, currently ranking third behind Florida and Texas. Averaging 374 newcomers daily, net migration—more people moving in than leaving — was responsible for 95% (573,272) of the state’s absolute population growth (604,525) between 2020 and 2024.

Thirty percent of North Carolina’s newcomers moved from abroad (182,263). And, notably, these international migrants assumed residence and drove population growth in some of the state’s major hubs of higher education, employment, research and development, sports, entertainment, and recreation.

Given ongoing restrictions on international migration and accelerating deportation of immigrants, the crucial question is this: Can North Carolina — a state in which international migration has played a critical role in growth and development — maintain its reputation as one of the best places to live and to do business in America in the future?

How many of them were legal? How many illegal/fake asylum seekers?

The answer depends on how we respond to other disruptive demographic trends we are experiencing as a nation and as a state: declining fertility, population aging, age-related mortality, and premature deaths of despair among native born Americans. If international migration is curtailed, census statistics confirm that these forces will continue to contribute to a progressive slowing of the annual rate of U.S. population growth and foreshadow absolute population decline — a historic first for our nation.

So, we have to replace Americans with foreigners with no allegiance to America? Sure sounds like Great Replacement Theory, which I was told wasn’t real.

A fair and just immigration policy is a strategic imperative for future growth and economic prosperity — in North Carolina and beyond. In reforming existing law and repealing executive orders governing immigration, the goals should be similar to those that led to the passage of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965. Also referred to as the Hart-Cellar Act, the law replaced a “half-century old discriminatory national origins system; prioritized family reunification, employment, and refugee status; and opened the doors of the U.S. to non-European immigration.”

We have that: they can apply for citizenship and go through the process. They can apply for a visa, come and work for a period of time. Then go home. That’s not what Democrats want: they want to open the floodgates for people from 3rd world shitholes and others who do not want to become Americans, they want to fundamentally change America to what they came from. And be Democrat voters.

Read: Immigrants Are Helping NC And We Totally Need A Fair Immigration System Or Something »

Posted in Democrats, Illegal Immigration | 14 Comments | Trackback URL

Mamdani Is Going After NYC Cops

By William Teach February 18, 2026 – 4:44 pm

When I wrote this in the morning I was joking: “Hey, maybe the city could simply defund all the cops, fire departments, and sanitation”. But, really, you just had to know that Mamdani would want to get rid of cops

The NYPD is already down at least 16% from their budget for officers, which is also well below what they really need. I’m betting Zohran’s security detail will not see cuts.

Read: Mamdani Is Going After NYC Cops »

Posted in Unhinged Tools | 3 Comments | Trackback URL

TDS: Orange Man Bad Taking Junk Food Away From Snap Recipients

By William Teach February 18, 2026 – 3:00 pm

Seriously, this could just be titled “Democrats Are Against Everything Trump Is For”

From the link, which was originally in the People’s Republik Of Chicago Tribune

Major changes to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, courtesy of President Donald Trump and his GOP-controlled Congress, have arrived across the nation. The reforms to the food assistance program for the needy come via the 2025 “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.”

The law mandates that SNAP recipients aged 18 to 64, and parents who don’t have children under 14 must document that they are working or volunteering for a total of 80 hours a month. If they don’t, they risk losing benefits.

Remember when Dems were behind Bill Clinton’s “workfare”?

In Indiana and other states, other reforms of SNAP should delight the Fat Nag. The Fat Nag, that is, yours truly. I have railed for decades against sugar, fast foods and other edible evils. My alter ago has lectured, pleaded and begged my readers to run for their lives from Doritos, Ding Dongs and Sprite.

America is drowning in fat. In 2023, around 40% of adults were defined as obese, according to data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

So, you might conclude that the Nag is delighted that residents of Indiana, Iowa and three other states are now forbidden from using SNAP food assistance for soda, candy and other foods, after waivers approved by the U.S. Department of Agriculture that began Jan. 1.

Not.

If it was a President Harris doing this Laura Washington would be in favor of it.

At least 18 states will enact federal waivers prohibiting the purchase of certain foods this year. The new restrictions vary from state to state but are being promoted by the Trump administration’s Make America Healthy Again campaign (MAHA). It’s “part of a push by Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins to urge states to strip foods regarded as unhealthy from the $100 billion federal program – long known as food stamps – that serves 42 million Americans,” the Associated Press reports. SNAP benefits are provided through an electronic transfer, like a debit card, and accepted at most grocery stores. (snip)

However, the Nag is not cheering these new SNAP restrictions. In fact, the Nag is incensed. I cannot abide this so-called MAHA ploy. It is a sham, a fraud and just another Trump “policy” that is just so much political flim-flam.

Why? Because Laura doesn’t like RFK, Jr. And because Trump is fat. And

This ban on sweet SNAP purchases is being handed down from Trump’s malevolent mountain. It is aimed at punishing low-income, struggling families.

This is just pure batshit crazy Trump Derangement Syndrome. There is no actual, adult, reasonable reason for taking the side of letting SNAP recipients purchase shit “food” with their benefits. Just TDS. MAGA (Make Asylums Great Again).

Read: TDS: Orange Man Bad Taking Junk Food Away From Snap Recipients »

Posted in Unhinged Tools | No Comments | Trackback URL

If All You See…

By William Teach February 18, 2026 – 1:00 pm

…is a horrible fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is The First Street Journal, with a post on that thing that never happens has happened again.

Read: If All You See… »

Posted in If All You See | 6 Comments | Trackback URL
Pirate's Cove