Cost Of DSA Policies? $49 Trillion

That’s a big number. Would $355K per household over 10 years be more manageable?

DSA leader dismisses $49T cost estimate for socialist policies as a ‘made-up number’

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) national co-chair Megan Romer was pressed on Fox News about how much socialist policies will cost American taxpayers after DSA-backed candidates made significant gains in midterm elections.

The White House Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) estimated that DSA policy proposals, including Medicare for All and student debt cancellation, would cost taxpayers $49 trillion. Romer, who said the group’s incoming lawmakers will prioritize affordability, dismissed the staggering price tag as “outrageous,” calling it a “made-up number.”

“The White House, who does not like us very much, managed to come up with some math that made us look bad,” Romer said on “The Story.” “But we don’t agree with these numbers.”

So, what are the numbers, sweety?

The CEA’s report estimated the DSA’s policy wish list will cost about $355,000 per American household over the next decade.

After rejecting the administration’s figures, Romer declined to offer an independent estimate of her own when pressed by Fox News anchor Martha MacCallum, saying the cost “depends.”

That’s an interesting economic policy, but, consider that so many of these DSA wackos have rich daddies, so, really do not understand the cost of things. They’re Theater Kids, so, it’s easy to offer Free Stuff without a consideration of what it will cost.

Remember, California estimated that single payer, er, Medicare For All, would cost double the current California budget, and wasn’t really sure where the money would truly come from.

“There’s no, like, one, solid number because it depends on what pieces we can build in the meantime,” the DSA leader said. “So it’s about building up programs and then sunsetting old, bad programs, and that number is going to shift as we pass various things.”

“I’m not going to give you a solid number. That’s not what I’m here to do,” she continued. “What I’m here to do is talk about how we collectively can democratically decide how we want our money to be spent.”

It’s easy to throw out policies. Once the actual adult thing of explaining how to pay for it comes into play things get a bit more squishy. Heck, look what happened with Obamacare. The financials are not doing particularly well, and it is even more trash without massive government subsidies. The DSA nutters aren’t actually very good at offering written plans and how they would work and how they would be paid for. I can’t find any of this on their website, but, they do have “Free Resources for making democratic socialist art and designs for your chapter.”

But, you know, “We must replace capitalism with democratic socialism”, so, they have a store selling T-shirts for $30. Seriously, they might yammer about it, but, they do not have anything approaching an action plan for Medicare for All, nor a true cost analysis. Nor for anything else. It’s all feelings based.

Sadly, though, a lot of people fall for this crap. And are indoctrinated into it in schools.

Read: Cost Of DSA Policies? $49 Trillion »

Judge Allows Climalawfare Suit To Proceed In Oregon

Will they also be shutting down the Portland international airport? How about the shipping ports? They all use a ton of fossil fuels. How about Portland getting 43% of its power from natural gas?

Oregon judge allows Multnomah County climate lawsuit against fossil fuel giants to advance

An Oregon judge will allow the climate lawsuit Multnomah County’ filed more than three years ago against some of the world’s largest fossil fuel companies to move forward.

Multnomah County Circuit Court Judge Adele J. Ridenour issued her decision Monday denying 20 of 21 arguments the fossil fuel defendants made to dismiss the 2023 case. Ridenour’s decision allows the case to continue to move toward a trial.

Multnomah County filed the $51 billion lawsuit against Chevron, Exxon, ConocoPhillips, Shell and the American Petroleum Institute, among several other companies and industry groups, following the 2021 heat dome when temperatures for five days in a row reached more than 100 degrees and R69 people in the county died. The Capital Chronicle reached out Wednesday to lawyers for those companies and the petroleum institute, as well as lawyers for seven other defendants but did not hear back. (snip)

The decision to allow the case to move forward comes months after Ridenour in June heard two days of oral testimony from the fossil fuel defendants, who argued centrally that Multnomah County is trying to effectively impose penalties on global and interstate pollution, which, under the federal Clean Air Act, is a power that the U.S. government, not state governments, hold.

But Ridenour said that while the county does find the companies’ fossil fuel pollution is at fault for the 2021 heat dome, the county is not seeking damages for the pollution itself, but for the companies’ deceptions to Oregonians, which allowed the pollution to continue to occur for decades.

Well, that’s novel, but, if it makes it out of county court, it will get squashed, either at the state level or the federal level, and the county will have wasted enormous amounts of taxpayer money on this tilting. Still, I once again recommend that all the named fossil fuels companies immediately stop selling to at least the plaintiffs and any who have signed on. Why would you do business with someone suing you?

Read: Judge Allows Climalawfare Suit To Proceed In Oregon »

Voters Who Use A Ton Of Data Reject Data Centers For Midterms

The people do realize how much data they are using, right? That a goodly chunk are using AI to do so? And all their streaming? And this that and the other? I guess this is the newest version for NIMBY

Data centers rejected by voters across the country — challenging the AI boom

Voters across the country delivered a sweeping rebuke to data center development in Tuesday’s midterm elections, approving restrictions on the massive facilities that have become central to the AI boom and electing officials who have promised to rein in their construction.

The results pose a new challenge to the building boom that has helped power U.S. economic growth and stock market gains, bringing in trillions of dollars in investments, in addition to a large amount of backlash.

Some 41 measures related to restricting or permitting data centers across ten states were up for consideration in the midterms, with Ohio alone accounting for half, per Ballotpedia, an election-focused nonprofit. In all but one of those measures, voters opted to restrict (or to not approve) data center construction, though four measures remained officially undecided as of Wednesday afternoon. Data-center skepticism crossed party lines, with restrictions passing in traditionally red states like Kansas and Florida, as well as liberal strongholds like California and New Jersey.

Many of the AI-focused measures would temporarily restrict the construction of new, large data centers, while others would restrict their location to industrial areas and place limitations on their environmental impacts. Five of the petitions or referendums approved Tuesday would allow data center construction as long as the facilities used fewer than 25 megawatts. Data centers built for AI purposes often require more than 100 megawatts.

I wonder how many who voted against these measures jumped into their vehicles, put on Android Auto or Apple Carplay, cranked up iHeart Radio or Pandora or Spotify or something, then doom-scrolled while waiting in line, then posted about how they voted against data centers on Insta or TikTok or something.

Across the country, voters also elected candidates — such as incoming Texas Governor Gina Hinojosa — who promised to rein in data centers’ construction or put strict guardrails around their use. NBC’s exit poll found more than half of voters said AI and data centers were “a major factor” in their vote for Congress. Approximately 76% of respondents said that they would oppose the construction of a data center in their community.

She, and others, are aware they used massive amounts of internet data to campaign, right?

Experts and pollsters attribute the backlash to a variety of root causes: frustration with growing income inequality and the billions of dollars tech tycoons stand to reap from AI; worries about catastrophic risks from AI; and more prosaic concerns about noise and health impacts.

Sigh.

Read: Voters Who Use A Ton Of Data Reject Data Centers For Midterms »

If All You See…

…is a fast rising sea from Other People voting wrong, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Science Daily, with a post on “Permanent daylight saving time has a dark side, scientists warn”

Read: If All You See… »

Obligatory Midterms Post

It was pretty ugly.

  • Islamist El-Sayed beat Rogers, but, it was a Dem hold (this is sad)
  • Jackson beat Collins, Dem switch
  • Andrews beat Moody in SC, that’s a big switch to Dem
  • Cooper beat Whatley in NC.
  • Brown over Husted in Ohio
  • Turek over Hinson in Iowa
  • Hamilton over Marshal in Kansas
  • Talarico over Paxton in Texas (but, let’s not forget that Texas used to be rather Blue, but, not wacko Blue)
  • We do not know about Alaska and Mississippi yet

Democrats picked up 7 Senate seats, and the Texas, Kansas, Iowa, and SC ones are big. Seriously, Texas? How much was the carpetbagger effect, with all those California escapees bringing their leftist politics after they let all the leftist politics? We see the same in NC and SC. And Abbott is probably going to lose the governor’s race in Texas.

Democrats picked up 30 in the House. Many were easily in play, many, like a bunch here in NC, were surprises. But, really, there are 4 reasons

  1. This happens quite often during midterms
  2. The carpetbagger effect
  3. Trump’s tariffs. Good idea, there really should be matching tariffs on what other countries do to the US, in an attempt to lower those tariffs, but, wrong time and wrong execution. Of course, there never seems to be a right time, and rather than implement them Team Trump should have worked on negotiation, and even gotten Congress involved. As the nation was still healing from COVID economic issues, shouldn’t have happened
  4. Iran. The Trump admin hit Iran, most likely thinking that it would help with the revolt and the people taking over and replacing the Islamist leaders. When that immediately looked like it wouldn’t happen they should have wrapped it up while that was still possible.

It is hilarious, though, that Democrats love them some low gas prices now, when they’ve shown they hate fossil fuels, and used high gas prices to push climate scam policies under Biden.

Let’s not forget that Obama got obliterated in the 2010 midterms. Lost 7 Senate seats, 63 House seats, 6 governors, and 20 state GAs flipped.

Of course, the GOP did not take advantage in a lot of cases. And there is a 5th reason: the GOP elites did not push hard for some races, such as Texas and SC, or even that hard in Michigan. Did you see the DNC backing off on nutjob, Jew and America hating, Islamist El-Sayed? No. They were all in. They know how to go all in no matter what.

Here in NC the Dems are going to flip the House, but, not the Senate. But, there is an interesting dichotomy

(WRAL) North Carolina voters on Tuesday approved three amendments to the state’s constitution — efforts by state lawmakers to restrict income tax rates and property tax increases, and to make it harder to change state rules on voter identification.

The amendments limit how much local leaders can raise property taxes, limit how much state leaders can raise income tax and ensure a photo ID is required for mail-in ballots. None of the amendments will change any tax rates for 2027, and a photo ID is already required for mail-in ballots under state law.

About 60% of voters approved the property tax amendment. About 62% of voters voted to approve the income tax amendment, and 60% of voters approved the voter ID amendment.

Was that a mistake about voter ID already being required for mail-in, or, a lie? Because the article goes to note later that it wasn’t required, only for in-person. Regardless, Democrats campaigned hard against all three, because they want ID-less voting and want to be able to raise taxes, especially on “the rich”.

Some opponents of the property tax and income amendments cited their potential to hamstring state and local governments’ abilities to raise revenue to cover services that the state won’t — at a time when the cost of services is rising.

Perhaps government could learn to spend what they take wisely, without all the graft, waste, and abuse. Treat it like it is their personal money and get the best value for the buck.

Supporters of the property tax amendment, including Republican lawmakers, said it would protect residents in growing areas from sticker shock when their property is reassessed and their local governments’ effective tax rates also go up.

Like when our property values went up 2.5 times post-COVID, so our property taxes jumped. This might not have passed if gov’t had said “we aren’t going to penalize you property owners for COVID increases, we’ll grandfather you in.”

North Carolina voters have now approved placing into the state constitution a cap on personal and corporate income taxes at no more than 3.5%.

It won’t change anyone’s taxes now but would effectively ban the legislature in the future from raising taxes to even the current tax rate, which is 3.99% for individuals. Some top Democrats have said they’d favor higher taxes on the wealthy, or on corporations, should they retake power in the state.

It’ll soon drop to 3.49%. Again, gov’t can learn to be responsible with the People’s Forcibly Taken Money. Anyhow, obviously GOP politicians were being punished but people also considered themselves for the ballot measures, of which the voter ID one is the one most surprises me.

To wrap up, the Republican Party leaders are idiots, and just do not know how to message well and protect their home court. We’ve seen this most of the 21st Century. Passing the big voting bill, the SAFE Act, would have fired up the Republican voters. But, nope, morons. What can Democrats do now, though? Not much. They’ll play the impeachment and investigation game, but, they do not have the votes in the Senate. Unless they want to nuke the filibuster, which would be dangerous for them when the GOP eventually retakes the Senate, none of their wacko will pass, and Trump will just veto it.

They can’t play the increase the size of the Supreme Court game, because then Trump gets to pick. None of their climate scam stuff will pass. But, they might get some lower case crazy through, because the GOP has too many squishes. Do they learn any lessons, and do the things to win in 2028?

Read: Obligatory Midterms Post »

Votes Totally Still About ‘Climate Change’ Even Though It’s Taking A Backseat In Elections, Gosh Darnit!

They care so much that they jumped in their fossil fueled vehicles to go vote

Teens say they’re concerned about climate change — but also don’t know much about it

From rising electricity bills to grocery prices, affordability has dominated the conversation heading into Election Day. But an issue receiving less attention on the campaign trail remains a concern for many voters: climate change.

New research from the University of Michigan suggests candidates may be underestimating how much Americans care about climate policy, even as they increasingly frame their campaigns around the cost of living.

The disconnect is playing out in North Carolina’s closely watched U.S. Senate race between Democratic former Gov. Roy Cooper and Republican Michael Whatley.

Cooper, who spoke frequently about climate change while serving as governor, has made lowering costs a centerpiece of his Senate campaign.

“We’ve got to remember that climate change is affecting weather patterns, is affecting the intensity of storms,” Cooper said after Hurricane Helene in 2024.

Two years later, his campaign message has centered on a different promise: to “make stuff cost less.”

Didn’t stuff skyrocket in price while he was governor? But, yeah, Roy hasn’t spoken much about ‘climate change’ while on the campaign trail.

Henderson says part of the challenge is that politicians may assume voters are more divided over climate change than they actually are.

“There is a perception that the public is as polarized as elites are on the issue, and that perception is not true,” Henderson told WRAL.

The distinction matters because concern about climate change does not necessarily follow the same partisan divisions seen among elected officials.

As I always say, Doing Something about climate doom may be popular in theory, but, in practice, it polls very low against real world issues. And most who say they care rarely make any climate friendly changes in their own lives.

The latest Yale Climate Opinion Maps offer a closer look at how North Carolinians view the issue.

Based on national survey data and statistical modeling, Yale researchers estimate that in Wake County:

  • 70% of adults are worried about global warming.
  • 69% prefer candidates who support action to address global warming.
  • 63% say a presidential candidate’s position on global warming is important to their vote.

The findings suggest climate change remains relevant to a substantial share of residents, even when it is not a dominant campaign talking point.

Yeah, well, Wake tends to be led by lots of liberals and lots of damnyankee transplants who escaped from the liberal policies they voted for, but, they’re all using a ton of energy, eating well, driving lots of fossil fueled vehicles.

Read: Votes Totally Still About ‘Climate Change’ Even Though It’s Taking A Backseat In Elections, Gosh Darnit! »

Good News: Immigration Cutbacks To Reduce Rental Home Demand

This is actually good news. Not for those who rent out and make a lot more money on the higher costs, of course

Immigration cuts poised to sharply shrink US rental demand

The sharp curtailment of US immigration has begun registering in the national rental market, with new analysis from Harvard University’s Joint Center for Housing Studies (JCHS) warning that annual renter household formation could drop by more than 400,000 by 2027.

The research, published this week by JCHS researcher Daniel McCue in Cambridge, Massachusetts, draws on the Census Bureau’s third-quarter 2026 Housing Vacancy Survey.

That report recorded the national rental vacancy rate rising to 7.6%, up from 7.1% a year earlier, alongside virtually no year-over-year gain in renter household counts.

McCue argues the data mark the first aggregate signal that reduced immigration is suppressing rental demand in a measurable way.

The less demand the lower the prices should be, and the cost of renting, be it apartments, homes, and townhomes, has skyrocketed since COVID, partly due to slower build-outs, and a lot due to Biden letting in so many damned aliens, along with The Government at various levels paying absurd amounts to house the aliens. I look around and the amount of massive apartment complexes and townhome projects I see going up in the Raleigh area, including the surrounding towns, is massive. But, rent is not coming down.

Recent immigrants — those who arrived within the prior two years — are the primary engine of immigrant-driven renter household growth.

In 2024, at the height of the post-pandemic surge, approximately 571,000 net new renter households were formed by arrivals since 2022, according to JCHS tabulations of American Community Survey data from the US Census Bureau.

Does that include illegals? All those Biden brought in from Ukraine and other countries?

For mortgage brokers, loosening rental conditions do create a conversion opportunity.

“As buying costs have eased in many markets, renters who are intentional about saving have a real opportunity to build toward a down payment faster than they might think,” Danielle Hale, chief economist at Realtor.com, said in April.

“As a first-time homebuyer, you shouldn’t expect four bedrooms, three baths, 2,800 square feet,” Gouge told Mortgage Professional America earlier this year on housing affordability challenges facing brokers.

“A starter home is a starter home. This is the first house. This is a stepping stone.”

They aren’t really building starter homes. Even townhomes are considered “luxury” ones these days. There’s not much being built in the 1,000-1,400 square foot range, so, conversion is difficult, especially when homes are about 2.5 times higher now than in 2020. Getting a lot of renters out of the market via booting aliens out will help drive down rentals. But, will it light a fire on building smaller homes?

Read: Good News: Immigration Cutbacks To Reduce Rental Home Demand »

Goreacle: We Need To Fix “Democracy” To Fix Climate Doom Or Something

By “fix democracy” he means investing authoritative government in charge, and the Useful Idiot base level Warmists are all for losing their freedom and life choices

Al Gore on Midterms 2026: “To Solve the Climate Crisis, We Need to Address the Democracy Crisis”

I watched Al Gore in An Inconvenient Truth in my eighth-grade US history class. It was the first time I learned about the depth of climate science, and it has stayed with me ever since. I have spent years organizing in the climate space, mobilizing the masses to vote, pushing for policy at the federal level, and consulting with the United Nations. While most registered voters would prefer to vote for a candidate who supports climate action, however, it often feels like much of the older generation has abandoned the issue.

You mean the movie that can’t be taught in British schools without a large explainer on all the scientific errors?

Even so, Mr. Gore has become a beacon of what happens when you step into your own power. He has served as a congressman, senator, and vice president of the United States. He has been steadfast in his determination to ring the alarm bells on the climate crisis, and held the first hearings in Congress on climate.

He’s also made a lot of money doing this schtick, eh?

These midterm elections will determine the balance of power in the House of Representatives and the Senate. And that means these elections will determine what policies will pass, and what policies will crumble. The past two years have presented us with demoralizing rollbacks: trampled endangered species protections, dissolved air pollution standards, and an all-out assault on climate justice.

When you write “climate justice” you admit this is not scientific, but, political. The author, Saad Amer, interviews Gore, they apparently have a long relationship, but, also has this to say

These policies don’t shift unless we take in that power and get to the polls and shift things in the right direction. Yesterday, I was doing a text bank, and we were able to text 25,000 voters in Michigan. So many people were excited to get texts from us and were telling us that they had already voted. We had so many more people volunteer to tell their friends to get out and vote. One person told me that they were volunteering with Planned Parenthood and mobilizing voters, but that they had free time, and then they wanted to sign up for more shifts to mobilize people to vote.

Right now I think the name of the game is democracy. Come November 4, the day after the election, is when we get back to holding our elected officials accountable and making sure that they know which policies they need to implement and are actually doing their job and representing our communities.

Got that? Unless the right types of people and policies are in office, it is Not Democracy.

AG: I was excited that just in the last week, young people and students were responsible for a huge surprise victory in Serbia, overturning the Putin-friendly dictator-wannabe there and electing a new democratically focused government. And the same day, basically, young people and students pulled off a surprise victory in the second round of the elections for president in Brazil. The son of Bolsonaro was the victor in the first round, and students got busy and turned that around, so that we have a progressive leader of Brazil now being reelected.

The one thing I would add to what you said is: We need more young people who care about climate action to become more active participants in our democracy. That means, of course, voting in this election—and not just for Congress. Make sure you do your research on your local races as well, to learn about the candidates and policies in your area…. Public service commissions determine a lot of energy choices and school boards.

See? Unless you vote for far-left wackadoodle Communists (that’s Commies in practice, not Political Theory 101, which is very much about very, very limited government) to control your life you hate Democracy.

Read: Goreacle: We Need To Fix “Democracy” To Fix Climate Doom Or Something »

If All You See…

…is an Evil fossil fueled vehicle, you might just be a Warmist

The blog of the day is Flopping Aces, with a post on “Abdul El-Sayed’s Creepy Locker Room Logic Should Scare the Hell Out of Michigan Parents”

Read: If All You See… »

What Do We Know About The Florida Plane Crash?

I’m not sure about you, but, good grief, the amount of Conspiracy Theories going on on social media is insane, especially when we do not know much of anything

That’s just a taste, as I’m sure you’ve seen. You’re looking at something traveling in excess of 500 knots at a ballistic angle on dashcams which are mostly 720p or 1080p at maybe 60fps. Here’s what we actually know

(Newsmax) 1. The Learjet plunged from 35,000 feet in a matter of minutes.

2. Ice was accumulating on the aircraft before the emergency. (very important)

3. The aircraft entered an extraordinary overspeed condition. (at the end it was about 20K feet per second down)

4. The NTSB says the aircraft may have started breaking apart before impact.

5. A powerful thunderstorm is a major focus of the investigation. (important)

6. Experts disagree about whether ice or turbulence was the bigger danger.

7. Questions are emerging about what the pilots could have done differently.

8. The 20-year-old co-pilot’s youth and experience are attracting attention.

9. The pilot in command was identified as Jeff Gregory, 55.

10. The seven passengers included an Austin entrepreneur and his young family.

11. Investigators are looking for the cockpit voice recorder. (is it there? And was there a Flight Data Recorder (FDR)?)

12. The crash also injured someone on the ground and displaced residents.

I’m not a pilot, but, I’ve watched Air Disasters from Smithsonian multiple times, as well as Mayday, the original Canadian production. There are essentially three things involved in a plane crash: people, mechanics, and/or weather. What roles did they play? Could the pilot and copilot done something different? A lot are going after Nathalia Gadelha Filgueiras, 20 years old, who had 1,300 hours of flight time, but, we do not know how much in the Learjet 60. There are lots of conspiracy theories about her, and, lots of sexism. You know me, I am not squishy about all that kinds of stuff, but, there comes a point where it is sexism. Like now, since no one knows truly what happened.

Though, one thing concerns me a bit: she was apparently texting her boyfriend, who’s also a pilot, about the weather and icing just 10 minutes before the accident. Was that the only text? If the weather was that bad she should have been monitoring and doing copilot stuff, not texting. Little distractions can cause big problems. Little distractions have caused pilots to fail to lower the flaps for takeoff, resulting in crashes. See Delta Air Lines Flight 1141 (1988), Spanair Flight 5022 (2008), and LAPA Flight 3142 (1999), among others.

At this point, we know a plane crashed, there was heavy bad weather over Florida. It wasn’t a missile strike on the plane, it wasn’t a missile or giant drone that crashed. A plane that crashes at that speed is obliterated, and creates that type of hole. This has happened many. Times. I remember one Air Disasters episode where a commercial prop plane crashed at a high speed, almost vertical angle, in a field and it was obliterated into tiny pieces. And now we wait for the NTSB investigation, which will take time. And their reports do not spare anyone. They have always been The Facts.

Read: What Do We Know About The Florida Plane Crash? »

Pirate's Cove