Via Cao’s Blog (cause I was just too damm lazy to look at the news today), word of Michael Newdow’s suit to have "Under God" removed from the Presidential Oath pitched out, rightly, on it’s ear.
Seriously, why does the majority have to cave to the minority, or, the nine, especially when the country was founded on freedom of religion? I wonder what the Pilgrims would think of this wack job? He was trying, in essence, to deny the majority their Freedom of Religion.
All posts here are my views. None represent my employer. If ye can prove me wrong, so be it. Ye can rant and rave at me, but be mostly polite to any other commentors. I will put up with quite a bit, but be mostly respectful to others.
NOTICE In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C., section 107, some material on this web site is provided without permission from the copyright owner, only for purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed further, except for "fair use" non-profit educational purposes, without permission of the copyright owner.
Pirate's Cove by Pirate's Cove is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
“why does the majority have to cave to the minority, or, the nine, especially when the country was founded on freedom of religion?”
Was that supposed to be irony?
.
No, it actually started out being that line from Star Trek II, then I remembered that it was Newdow + 8.