Simply amazing. Is it possible for Mo Dowd to write one, just one, commentary without mentioning George Bush? She starts a piece on a virtual museum in Kentuky that is about Creationism. Somehow, this is Bush’s fault. Unbelieveable. Well, from Mo, not really.
Do male nipples prove evolution?
Not at all, according to a Web site for a planned Creation Museum devoted to showing that the Bible is literally true.
Nipples may be biologically de trop for men, an "expert" on the site notes, but that doesn’t mean they resulted from natural selection. They could just as well be a decorating feature of the Creator’s (like a hood ornament). Who are we to question His designs, since we cannot presume to comprehend His mind?
Ok, you have your opinion, Mo, they have their’s. But, this website is just a backdrop for:
As with Iraq, President Bush has applied his doctrine of pre-emption on evolution, cutting it off before it can pose a threat to our well-being.
Ever since he observed during his 2000 campaign that "on the issue of evolution, the verdict is still out on how God created the earth," Mr. Bush has been reeling backward as fast as he can toward the Garden of Eden, which, if creationists are to be believed, was really "Jurassic Park."
Wouldn’t it be easier, and less time consuming, for Mo to just write "I Hate Bush" 100 times, and print that every week? Of course, she somehow turns creationism into a rant against Bush and creationism, SS, and the environment. Wacky.
Don’t forget, anyone who challenges the vitality of SS is with the other SS!
How funny! All I can think is that nipples are probably “de trop” for Mo.