I gotta tell you, it takes shear genius (or twisted minds) to write an entire article regarding knowledge about Atta and cohorts being known about in 1999 without one mention of Clinton:
The Sept. 11 commission knew military intelligence officials had identified lead hijacker Mohamed Atta as a member of al-Qaida who might be part of U.S.-based terror cell more than a year before the terror attacks but decided not to include that in its final report, a spokesman acknowledged Thursday. (nope, no Bill there)
According to Weldon, a classified military intelligence unit called ”Able Danger” identified Atta and three other hijackers in 1999 as potential members of a terrorist cell in New York City. Weldon said Pentagon lawyers rejected the unit’s recommendation that the information be turned over to the FBI in 2000. (Bill, where are you?)
”Even if it were valid, it would’ve joined the lists of dozens of other instances where information was not shared,” Felzenberg said. ”There was a major problem with intelligence sharing.” (nothing about Slick in that one)
Granted, the article was about the 9/11 Commission blowing it, but, as of yet, every AP, NY Times, La Times, and Washington Post article I have seen has failed to mention that Clinton was President during that time period, and it was his rules, through Jamie Goerlich, that caused the information to not be shared. Will they ever mention that Clinton was president till Jan 20, 2001, or will they somehow blame this on Bush?
