Or so say 60 scientists (via memeorandum, which you should check out alot)
Canada’s new Conservative prime minister, Stephen Harper, has been urged by more than 60 leading international climate change experts to review the global warming policies he inherited from his centre-Left predecessor.
Oh, so not every scientist believes that Man is causing Global Warming, er, Climate Change.
They emphasised that the study of global climate change is, in Mr Harper’s own words, an “emerging science” and added: “If, back in the mid 1990s, we knew what we know today about climate, Kyoto would almost certainly not exist, because we would have concluded it was not necessary.” Despite claims to the contrary, there is no consensus among climate scientists on the relative importance of the various causes of global climate change, they wrote.
“‘Climate change is real’ is a meaningless phrase used repeatedly by activists to convince the public that a climate catastrophe is looming and humanity is the cause. Neither of these fears is justified.
“Global climate changes all the time due to natural causes and the human impact still remains impossible to distinguish from this natural ‘noise’.”
Exactly. There is too much contradictory evidence out there. I’m sure that the Global Warming, er, Climate Change proponents will say that all 60 scientists are paid by the oil or coal lobbies, in a disengenuous attempt to deflect from their utter lacking in real scientific research. For a global warming proponent to sit there and tell me what the Earth will be like in 50-100 years with computer models, when they cannot even say where a hurricane will go 3 days out, is the hight of idiocy.
If the climate change folks would argue logically, without all the extremism, they might get those on the bubble, as well as those who do not believe in it, to try and reduce pollutants such as CO2 output from motor vehicles, ocean waste disposal, industrial output, and others. But, they prefer hysterics over sanity.
