I guess he is trying to be the new Robin Williams (back when he did stand up)
Former senator John Edwards (N.C.), lingering in third place in most polls, took the lead in attacking Clinton as Democrats gathered for the fourth of their six official debates. He mocked Clinton for voting to designate Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist group, and he all but accused her of being corrupt.
It’s usually at this point that we all wonder “whose side is he on?” Amazing, he actually has a problem with the Iran thing. Why am I not surprised by that?
Voters, Edwards said, “deserve a president of the United States that they know will tell them the truth, and won’t say one thing one time and something different at a different time.”
Let’s harken back to how Edwards made his money, using complete bullshit to swindle baby doctors and their insurance companies into paying huge settlements, usually awarded by a jury. And let’s not forget the channeling of an infant that one time. Seems honest and truthful to me!
BTW, why can’t they call him “former failed V.P. nominee” or “former 2004 presidential candidate because he was so bad that the N.C. Democrats asked him not to run for his Senate seat a second time”?
Interestingly, Mo Dowd wanders on to the scene. Reading her latest editorial, is she for or against Hillary? She is all over the place. Kinda like Hillary when it comes to licenses for illegals.
