Today is the day that Carrie Prejean should find out if she keeps her crown. If she loses it, that would be very strange since she represents “If it feels good, do it!” California. But, is there a double standard going on?
While racy photos of Miss California Carrie Prejean could cost the outspoken first runner up in the Miss USA pageant her crown, pageant officials don’t seem to care about even steamier photos of Miss Rhode Island that appeared in a men’s magazine.
So is Prejean being targeted simply for her beliefs?
Yes.
Meanwhile 2009 Miss Rhode Island Alysha Castonguay has also posed in revealing photo shoots, but is apparently not in danger of losing her crown.
Castonguay posed topless for a Maxim magazine shoot and a few swimsuit calendars before competing in the pageant, but reportedly revealed the pictures to Miss USA officials, who approved them.
Of course, the big difference here is Carries contract. But, if she hadn’t given that answer about gay marriage, think there would be all this uproar?
Yeah, me neither.
Prejean should be fired if that is what her contract states. But, not because some folks on the left have gone off the rails and gotten personal because they do not like her gay marriage answer. The tolerance of the Left is rather picky.
The Dirty, which has pretty much started the whole photo flap, promises that the hammer will drop on Wednesday, and “does sexually explicit mean anything?” TMZ has some edited photos that are probably NSFW, barely, not really that bad, unless you are a Puritan, which seems the way the Left is acting. You can also compare to some of the photos that Castonguay did for Maxim here.
The Other McCain asks if we can talk about stereotypes.
Don Surber discusses the hypocrisy.
More (before the photo’s): Carrie gets to keep her crown, and The Donald states
At a press conference addressing Carrie Prejean’s disputed title in the Miss USA competition, pageant owner Donald Trump compared Prejean’s stated views on gay marriage to Obama’s.
“It’s the same answer that the president of the United States gave,†Trump said. “She gave an honorable answer. She gave an answer from her heart.â€
Heh. Dan Collins says that Protein Wisdom isn’t that kind of blog. Wink. The Other McCain, Jammie Wearing Fool, and American Power are 
Gay Patriot has an excellent post entitled Hurling Even More Ad Hominems at Carrie Prejean & Her Allies
A few of the photo’s, not really safe for work, but, nothing really bad, below the break. But first, some google-bombing!!! Carrie Prejean topless naked nude Carrie Prejean topless naked nude Carrie Prejean topless naked nude Carrie Prejean topless naked nude Carrie Prejean topless naked nude
Big woop, eh? Maybe this would be racy in 1940, but, not 2009.
You can also see several, including one of Castonguay, at my Gallery page.
Crossed at Right Wing News and Stop The ACLU
It wasn’t the “left” that put the no nude clauses in her contract. It was the social conservatives who are against sexuality not liberals.
But it was the liberals who didn’t like her response to the gay marriage question who decided to go digging into her past, looking for dirt on her.
Granted, John, she broke her contract, no doubt about that, but, would that even have come up if the left had done as MBP points out, and decided to personally destroy her?
And Teach there is also the age issue. She was a minor when she posed for those racy photos, oh and of course the newest pics to come out go beyond what Miss RI showed.
You mean the new ones that have her head photoshopped on a different body?
Racy, John? Perhaps. You can see racier on the afternoon soaps. Underage? She shows nothing. And, yeah, at least one of them looks rather photoshopped. And what is with the blurryness?