If you expected it to be about as solid as a sewer water, yeah, that’s about right
A cross examination of global warming science conducted by the University of Pennsylvania’s Institute for Law and Economics has concluded that virtually every claim advanced by global warming proponents fail to stand up to scrutiny.
The cross-examination, carried out by Jason Scott Johnston, Professor and Director of the Program on Law, Environment and Economy at the University of Pennsylvania Law School, found that “on virtually every major issue in climate change science, the [reports of the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] and other summarizing work by leading climate establishment scientists have adopted various rhetorical strategies that seem to systematically conceal or minimize what appear to be fundamental scientific uncertainties or even disagreements.â€
I’ve slowly started reading the document (2nd link in the blockquote), and it is, well, not really eye opening, since most of us who haven’t drank the green kool aid knew AGW really had no legs to stand on. Money quote
(Professor Johnson) found that the climate establishment does not follow the scientific method. Instead, it “seems overall to comprise an effort to marshal evidence in favor of a predetermined policy preference.â€
As we have been saying. Maybe you climate alarmists should listen.
