We’re constantly told that fossil fuels are the worst cause of “climate change”, you know, hotcoldwetdry. So why’s Hillary Clinton flying to the Arctic to view “climate change”?
Arctic Warming Means Challenges, Clinton Says
Thinning polar ice means more sea traffic through the Arctic at a time of territorial claims to an area that could contain as much as 20 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and natural gas reserves. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton met with Norwegian officials to discuss the changing Arctic.
The (Norwegian) foreign minister brought Secretary Clinton to this city above the Arctic Circle to meet with scientists and business leaders preparing for greater ocean traffic and greater oil exploration in a region that the U.S. Geologic Survey says could hold $9 trillion in oil and minerals.
So, Hillary took an unnecessary fossil fueled flight to Norway (her second trip in a year) and rode on a fossil fueled ship to discuss how fossil fuels are making it hotcoldwetdry as well as how to increase oil exploration? WTF?
Another reason she was there was to push the disastrous Law Of The Sea Treaty.
Ok. Fine. If norway doesn’t want sea traffic, then we can bypass them. Am sure that other countries would love to buy our goods.
THere’s a campaign slogan: “Vote for me. I’ll stop all ocean-based transport.”
It’s always amazing to me how much liberals fear changing weather.
[…] Pirate’s Cove: Hillary Clinton Takes Unnecessary Fossil Fueled Trip To View “Climate Change†[…]