Um, ok
(The Blaze) “I believe that the situation that we face, Mr. President, is as dangerous as any of the sort of real crises that we talk about,†Kerry said. “Today we had a hearing in the Foreign Relations Committee on the subject of Syria, and we all know what’s happening with respect to Iran, and nuclear weapons and the possibility even of a war.â€
He continued, “Well, this issue actually is of as significant a level of importance, because it affects life itself on the planet. Because it affects ecosystems on which the oceans and the land depend for the relationship of the warmth of our earth and the amount of moisture that there is and all of the interactions that occur as a consequence of our climate.â€
Then he decided to go with the tired old trope about a “disinformation” campaign, which would never work if the science of AGW was on a sound, and scientific, footing.
He added, “We have in effect, with respect to climate change in America today, what is fundamentally a flat-earth caucus, a bunch of people – some of them in the United States Congress itself – who still argue, against all the science, all the evidence, they argue that somehow we don’t know enough about climate change, or they argue that the evidence isn’t sufficient, or they argue that it just is a hoax.â€
Hmm, last time I checked, insulting people wasn’t the best way to convince them. Silly me.
Don’t forget to add secrecy, disenfranchisement, blackmail, illegal blocking of FOIA requests, hiding or deleting of research data, etc.
That is how you handle settled science: By hiding all of your evidence that is supposed to support it and blocking all access to that data.
Because when its truthful and of such importance, it must be kept secret.