Yeah, another post today on the Journal News issue, but, the Judge, whose name appeared on The List, provides an epic smackdown. I particularly like the part about how the Journal News just made battered women unsafe (way back I volunteered at a battered women’s shelter in Greenville)
(Video has autoplay, so only shows in single post status. Click the more tag)
The fact taht they are now known to be armed will also serve to protect them, right Teach ?
Oh. So now you are arguing that since the criminals know who can protect themselves, they will go after the people who can’t?
Thanks.
You just made the point for everyone here.
And by the way john, if being armed is so horrible, why did the Journal hire armed security guards?
wow.. very nice spank-down. THat was awesome!!!
brought a tear to my eye.
So, you think that it’s a good idea that women who have been abused should be left disarmed so that the abusers can beat the shit, seriously harm, and potentially kill women, John? I love how Liberals would prefer to see women hurt above allow Other People to be armed. That’s part of the liberal war on women, the real war on women.
Don’t ever expect an answer from John or any liberal anytime soon on that question, GC. Media Matters hasn’t released their talking points yet.
Now, if the Journal News will be just as conscientious in publishing the names and addresses of people on welfare, unemployment and food stamps in those same affluent areas, perhaps their neighbors can identify which ones are lazy bums, deadbeats, freeloaders, common thieves and parasites who aren’t entitled to be receiving those benefits at the exense of the rest of us.
Just a thought.
* expense *
John, Teach’s opinions aren’t the issue here. Don’t you see anything wrong with what those two officious woman at The Journal News did?
John, Teach’s opinions aren’t the issue here. Don’t [you] see anything wrong with what those two officious women at The Journal News did? What are [your] well reasoned opinions on these issues? Seriously, I want to know.