Warmists are desperately searching for ways to keep their dying cult going. Here’s Brad Plumer at The Washington Post
Global warming appears to have slowed lately. That’s no reason to celebrate.
What do you see when you look at this chart?
Well, if you’re not a dogmatic, brainwashed, science-avoiding (and hypocritical in your own life) Warmist like Brad, you see yearly changes in average temperature caused by nature in the blue and red, and that nature is mostly responsible for the other years. If you are Warmist, though
1) Global warming is still very much with us. The recent slowdown in temperature rise has left climatologists a bit puzzled, but it certainly doesn’t disprove global warming. The evidence on the effects of greenhouse gases, after all, stretches back more than a century.
No, it doesn’t disprove global warming. It does disprove the notion of anthropogenic global warming, ie, “climate change”, being the main or sole driver of the Modern Warm Period.
This is followed by the “OMG, the heat is hiding in the deep oceans!!!! We’re eventually doooooomed!!!” meme, and then the “OMG, things are going to get super duper hot and people and animals will spontaneously combust and life on earth will end, so we need all sorts of taxes and government and stuff”. Standard Warmist doctrine. Without the ability to prove scientifically that those gray bars are mostly or solely caused by Mankind.
Teach I predict that 2013 will again be in the top 10 ranking of hottest years. what do you think?
‘ Yes or no
I expect NO johnny five. As our temps have not been normal for our area. And we all know local means global.
Anyone else confused by this sentence?
so, the effects of greenhouse gases is a relatively new thing? Wonder why it wasn’t an effect during the 1800s.
And I call bogus on this graph.
This one is much better and believable.
BTW, if you can’t prove it, then it aint true!!!
Heard Obama once again claimed that temperatures are still climbing over last 10 years. Like, Detroit is going awesome economically too.