…is an evil plastic water bottle causing hundreds of millions of people to move, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Capitalist Preservation, with a post on the obscenity of Obama’s shutdown.
THE AUTHOR
PAGES
Recent Comments
- ruralcounsel on PRC Says They Won’t Help With Deportations: “They don’t have to help. But they damn well need to stay out of the way.” Dec 3, 12:32
- Professor Hale on Trump Writes There Will Be Hell To Pay If Hamas Doesn’t Release The Hostages: “Professor, you disappoint me. It won’t be the last time. The military can’t be used within the US. Not true.…” Dec 3, 12:31
- Forearmed on Sweden Sees Children Carrying Out Contract Killings: “There is one quick way to stop that, but you must also have the resolve to take it to the…” Dec 3, 12:15
- Professor Hale on Trump Writes There Will Be Hell To Pay If Hamas Doesn’t Release The Hostages: “I accept your argument and bona fides on this issue. Still, I automatically reject the “we must do something” argument…” Dec 3, 12:14
- James Lewis on Obligatory Joe Pardons Hunter Post: “Well, I never saw the USSC doing anything about Roe V Wade, but they did. I think any citizen could…” Dec 3, 11:49
I for one, being a limited gov’t sort of fellow, find it rather amazing that people can live on federal lands. I understand that they have a lease that assumes that the “homes” are vacation spots. But, even so… why are people allowed to build their private vacation homes on federal lands?
Grazing, i can sort of understand because its a vast grassland that would go to waste otherwise and the feds are getting paid by letting someone else manage the lands.
But, for lands around a lake that people are living on?
The feds need to sell this land to the “renters” or another private entity.
To me, anything on federal land is federal property and thus public property. and that includes the grazing lands. If you want a lease to graze your cattle, then you have to be willing to see “public” use that land. it can not be a sole-use lease.