Sarah Palin Discusses Obama’s Mom Jeans And Equivocation On Russia

A bit of red meat

(Mediaite) Sarah Palin sat down with Sean Hannity Monday night for a victory lap of sorts, touting her 2008 comments about Russia capitalizing on a weak Barack Obama presidency to amass power. Palin believed she was vindicated, saying Russia exploited “Obama’s weak leadership.”

She said, “Anybody who carries the common-sense gene knows that Putin doesn’t change his stripes.” Palin and Hannity agreed that when the U.S. can’t “feed others with our resources,” people grow more reliant on Russia’s resources and it emboldens them, which is why the U.S. should approve the Keystone XL pipeline. Vladimir Putin, Palin said, is viewed as a man who “wrestles bears and drills for oil,” while Obama’s “potency” is one of “weakness” and said he’s viewed as a man who “wears mom jeans and equivocates and bloviates.”

She bashed Obama for having a policy of “leading from behind” and warned that nations other than Russia are “taking advantage of that weakness in America at this point.” Palin also quipped that if Putin wants to quell uproar about his violations of the law, he should borrow a page from Obama’s playbook and call them “executive orders.”

Video via Politico below the fold

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

7 Responses to “Sarah Palin Discusses Obama’s Mom Jeans And Equivocation On Russia”

  1. Jeffery says:

    Perhaps the Alaskan former half-governor, and media whore who’ll say anything for a buck, should save some of her opprobrium for the 2008 President (from her own party) who allowed the manly, bare-chested, bear-wrestling Putin to invade Georgia back then. Maybe Putin turns her on sexually as much as did NBA star Glen Rice.

    Anyway, we know how much the far-right authoritarians love them some manly men, and will follow them anywhere. Like Grenada, Panama and Iraq.

    Ms. Palin is still upset that she received well-deserved criticism in 2008 and lost the election for the Republicans. Like all conservatives, she exhibits Obama Derangement Syndrome.

  2. gitarcarver says:

    If there is someone who knows about whores, it seems to be Jeffery.

    However, his anger in this case is misplaced. As usual he tries to deflect from what this President is doing (or not doing) and instead blame others.

    Perhaps he is angry for Palin and Romney correctly saying this situation would occur while being derided by Obama, Biden and others on the left.

    Only in the childish minds of liberals are people that get things right worthy of scorn and people that get things wrong worthy of praise.

  3. Blick says:

    Jeffery, stop with the name calling. Its a tactic for losers, bullies and warmists.

  4. See, now of I had written a post calling Wendy Davis, Michelle Obama, or Hillary Clinton a “media-whore” Jeff would have freaked out and hammered on about the GOP war on women, etc and so on. You know the Playbook. But he’s more than happy to throw the derogatory and demeaning slur towards Palin.

    What he can’t do is defend Obama’s weak-toast and pathetic foreign policy positions.

  5. Jeffery says:

    Half-governor Palin had nothing to offer about the Ukraine situation other than to ridicule the President for his clothing.

    Nothing to defend. I disagree with your opinion. You have not made an argument.

    We get it. You hate Obama. You exhibit Obama Derangement Syndrome.

  6. gitarcarver says:

    Half-governor Palin had nothing to offer about the Ukraine situation other than to ridicule the President for his clothing.

    And once again Jeffery shows his ignorance in that Palin said much more than what Jeffery wants you to believe.

    Answer this Jeffery: Was Palin right about Putin in 2008? Was Romney right about him in 2012? Did Obama and Biden mock Romney for what has now been proven to be more accurate and having more foresight than Obama?

    Nothing to defend.

    Agreed. There is nothing to look at where one can say “look at this success by Obama!” in the foreign policy arena. His policies have been and remain indefensible.

    I disagree with your opinion.

    Translation: I can’t argue with your facts, so all I can do is call people names and act indignant.

    You have not made an argument.

    Says the ostrich with their head in the sand. Once again, Jeffery simply dismisses, doesn’t read, or doesn’t address anything that shows he is wrong.

    You exhibit Obama Derangement Syndrome.

    You exhibit Bush Derangement Syndrome.

    There. Fixed for ya.

  7. Trish Mac says:

    I think I like John better. He at least, usually, keeps a sense of decorum.
    As for trolls, I guess they don’t have such a characteristic.

Pirate's Cove