I’ve mentioned many times that one of the things about the “climate change” movement is that it takes real, and sometimes very serious, environmental issues, and places them under the banner of “climate change”, when they have really nothing to do with CC and would be best off standing on their own. Here we go again
(Slate) When all seems lost, sometimes all there’s left to do is laugh.
Last month, 487 artists from 72 countries submitted 1,063 drawings to compete for the Niels Bugge Cartoon Award, an international competition aimed at drawing attention to environmental issues. Their combined perspective (how often do you get to see political cartoons from Iran, Serbia, and Brazil side-by-side?) is a powerful reminder that we’re all dreading the next news of the painful state of our planet’s health together.
A quaint Danish hotel named for a 14th-century knight organized the competition, which is now in its second year and is billed modestly as the “World Cup of satirical cartoons.†This year’s theme, “the oceans are in our hands,†focused on climate change. The jury is composed of nine, mostly European, cartoonists, and the competition is sanctioned by the Federation of Cartoonists Organizations. After the Prophet Muhammad cartoon controversy in 2006, FECO organized a competition called “Make Humor Not War.â€
Here’s the lead drawing
[…] Pirate’s Cove: Masking Real Environmental Issues With “Climate Change†[…]
Teach do you believe that mining and burning coal creates pollution?
Look at what coal ash did in your own state
How many times have I written that I am not a fan of coal, John? Lots. I’m not. I’d like to see it replaced with a clean(er) alternative. But, that environmental position has nothing to do with “climate change”, but real environmental pollution.
J, the antagonist as always. And true to his history, he doesn’t address the content of the post. He only has his anger and idiocy to spew.
There is nothing much wrong with coal if it is used and treated correctly. Much like any power source, it can turn deadly for localities.
Yet, with all of coal’s dangers, it contains SO MUCH energy that it is impossible to replace currently with non-organic sources.