…is a wonderful climate change friendly big city, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is Right Wing News, with a post stating that Iraq would not be happening with a President Romney.
This is Big City week!
THE AUTHOR
PAGES
Recent Comments
- Jl on Shell Beats Climate Cult In Dutch Appeals Court Case: “Except of course the Pennsylvania SC had already issued that order earlier, so Shapiro waited until the second time the…” Nov 20, 08:45
- Jl on If All You See…: “Sorry, J-it didn’t benefit the rich any more than any other group, as all cuts were in the 2% range.” Nov 20, 08:38
- L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! on If All You See…: “The fact that you still spout the same bullshit that cost you the White House, the House and the Senate…” Nov 20, 08:38
- Dana on If All You See…: “The law was changed in 2022, making it such that the President of the Senate has no authority in this.…” Nov 20, 08:36
- Kye on If All You See…: ““So wage earners would subsidize the wealthy?” Hey stupid! Wage earners have always subsidized the wealthy where have you been?…” Nov 20, 08:35
LOL. You call that a post about Iraq? More like a belch.
What would equity capitalist Romney have done? Bankrupt ISIS? LOL
Is there one good idea, anywhere, under any rock, in the entire far-right movement?
Nope. It is more like a post on how lousy a president Obama is.
Well, one thing we do know that Romney did and Obama did not – he recognized the threat.
What Romney would have done is a matter of speculation. We know what Obama did – nothing. And his willingness to do nothing led directly to the disaster in Iraq.
Baloney. Thousands of young Americans killed or maimed. $2 trillion borrowed and spent. And a failed state. That’s what you and Mr. Bush did. Thanks. Iraq and Maliki didn’t step up. The current tragedy in Iraq is another mess conservative policies left for someone else to clean up.
Now you want to re-invade? Are you incapable of learning?
Digestive problems?
That can be the only reason for your illogical and deflection of what has been said.
The fact of the matter is that Romney recognized ISIS as a threat. Obama did not.
Romney made the call without the benefit of PDB or access to reports from the military and the intelligence community. Obama ignored them all.
Obama made f big deal about the withdrawal of troops and even lied saying that the Iraqi government wanted the US gone. He then turned away when the Iraqis asked for help in stemming the ISIS threat.
In short, you are wrong on the facts and resort to the old thing of “it is Bush’s fault.”
Why is it that liberals can’t take responsibility for anything?
Are you that much of a child?
LOL. In 2007 Romney guessed there could be unrest in Iraq because of the Sunnis and Shia.
Willard was trounced in the election by an unpopular black man during the early days of a deep recession.
What do you think Willard would have done differently? He’s had almost 6 yrs to think about it.
I’m sorry you’re irked that Mr. Bush invaded Iraq and screwed up everything. If Mr. Gore had been elected we wouldn’t have invaded Iraq and we would have avoided the Great Recession. Thanks conservatives!!
Here’s the entire childlike prose that Mr. Teach found so compelling:
What’s happening in Iraq would not have happened under President Romeny (sic)
Written By : Samuel Gonzalez
August 10, 2014
“This is what happens when a community organizer is elected to office of the presidency!
President Obama once called ISIS the “JV†in Iraq. Well, the JV has become the Varsity and is chopping off heads as they take over a huge swath of the country.
Now, because Obama routinely leads from behind the crowd, he has put the United States in great peril. ISIS is setting their sights on us and Obama is too naïve to realize it.”
Is the US in great peril from ISIS? Really? We heard this ten years ago regarding al Qaeda and mushroom clouds. The wet-your-pants scared Republicans and their conservapundit cheerleaders are trying to get us to invade again.
Are you guys volunteering? It’s hypocritical if you don’t, isn’t it?
There was more to it than that and I would hope you would know it, but even so, it is a shame that you are so blinded by hatred that you have no problems with what is happening in Iraq because of Obama.
I have no idea who “Willard” is other than a weather guy and a name of a movie.
Even so, once again we see how you are trying to shift the discussion to what would or could have been done and away from the fact that Romney was right and Obama was wrong.
Guitar,
It is a waste of time commenting with old Jeff. He either lies, leaves out significant chunks of background and knowledge or else truly does not understand a single aspect of the way the world works. Only a liberal nut can come to the conclusion that a situation such as Iraq is not the result of the failed foreign policy of the current sitting president and blame the whole thing on Bush. You really can’t argue with these people, only hope that we can divide into two countries and allow them to destroy themselves.
dave,
My prayers would be answered if the redneck states up and seceded forming the New Confederate States of America (NCSA). You do realize that the maker states like California, Massachusetts, New Jersey, Illinois and NY etc would stop supporting the taker states like LA, MS, Bama, OK, KY, TN, WV, SC etc.
Maybe the NCSA could enslave Mexicans to do all your work.
America was working pretty well economically until the conservatives were able to enact their 4 policy ideas. Cutting taxes on the wealthy, deregulating businesses, fellating corporations and invading random nations. Thanks, Ronnie.
Humpty Dumpty,
Willard is Romney’s real name. What would Willard do(WWWD)? It’s kind of like Obama’s claim that he opposed invading Iraq in 2003. So what? He was powerless to do anything. As was/is Romney now. Romney said Iraq and the Middle East would continue to be unstable. Duh.
Jeffery,
As Romney goes by the name of “Mitt,” one would think that you would at least have the class and respect to refer to him in that fashion.
Alas, you once again prove that you neither have class or respect of anything other than yourself.
That being said, you continue to dodge the essential issue: Romney was right and Obama was wrong.
Until you can get that through your head, you are just a child ranting that he cannot have a cookie.
Jeff,
I saw the cutting of taxes work just like it should. In the recession following 9/11 (brought about by Clinton), the economy responded just like it should. What made it tank and continue to tank was one person and that was Barney Frank. As to regulation, that is a joke, right? I agree that bowing to the corporations is wrong, but that is a Democrat thing. Also, the wars were necessary and were universally supported by the liberals. So come up with fresh material.