I was actually surprised he didn’t do this in a Slate post I referenced earlier of his. I guess he was waiting to tweet it
Counterintuitive, yes, but extreme snowfalls are becoming more common in places like Buffalo due to global warming. http://t.co/6xR0wRZiYL
— Eric Holthaus (@EricHolthaus) November 19, 2014
He’s not the only one going down this road. There are plenty of other tweets. He’s one if the biggest, though.
Well, he is half right (morally) Climate Change is happening — just in the opposite direction. They never expect “change” to happen in both directions. That is what happens when you try to draw a benchmark of optimum temps. Change can also be below the benchmark.
How is it possible that warmer Great Lakes and higher atmospheric water content leads to more snow when a strong cold front comes through?
Here’s how Holdhaus explains it:
Jeffery, just what you’d expect with the polar vortex creating that temperature differential. Doesn’t mean the absolute temperature of the lake is any warmer than usual. The air is much colder than usual.
Am I the only one who remembers that Buffalo gets massive amounts of snow, like, all the time?
jd,
As the Earth warms, so do the lakes.
The point wasn’t that Buffalo never had snows before but that they’ve increased in frequency and severity.
Lung cancer didn’t originate with cigarette smoking, but smoking increased the number of cases.