Members of the Cult of Climastrology, mostly comprised of far left Progressives (nice fascists) are thrilled by what the Pope will supposedly say regarding Hotcoldwetdry
(Guardian) Pope Francis will this week call for changes in lifestyles and energy consumption to avert the “unprecedented destruction of the ecosystem†before the end of this century, according to a leaked draft of a papal encyclical. In a document released by an Italian magazine on Monday, the pontiff will warn that failure to act would have “grave consequences for all of usâ€.
Francis also called for a new global political authority tasked with “tackling … the reduction of pollution and the development of poor countries and regionsâ€. His appeal echoed that of his predecessor, pope Benedict XVI, who in a 2009 encyclical proposed a kind of super-UN to deal with the world’s economic problems and injustices.
So, more global governance, more control of people’s lives. Authoritarianism.
According to the lengthy draft, which was obtained and published by L’Espresso magazine, the Argentinean pope will align himself with the environmental movement and its objectives. While accepting that there may be some natural causes of global warming, the pope will also state that climate change is mostly a man-made problem.
“Humanity is called to take note of the need for changes in lifestyle and changes in methods of production and consumption to combat this warming, or at least the human causes that produce and accentuate it,†he wrote in the draft. “Numerous scientific studies indicate that the greater part of the global warming in recent decades is due to the great concentration of greenhouse gases … given off above all because of human activity.â€
Will Pope Francis, and all those who are squeeing over this pronouncment, agree to give up their own modern lifestyles? No fossil fuels, no ice makers, only buying local, handwashing clothes, etc? How much power does Vatican City use? The encyclical blames fossils directly as part of the problem? Will the Pope cancel his upcoming fossil fueled airplane trips?
The leak has frustrated the Vatican’s elaborate rollout of the encyclical – a papal letter to bishops – on Thursday. Its release had been planned to come before the pope’s trip to the US, where he is due to address the United Nations as well as a joint meeting of Congress.
Huh. So he planned to blame fossil fuels right before taking that fossil fueled airplane trip. Weird, right?
The pope will also single out those obstructing solutions. In an apparent reference to climate-change deniers, the draft states: “The attitudes that stand in the way of a solution, even among believers, range from negation of the problem, to indifference, to convenient resignation or blind faith in technical solutions.â€
I wonder if Pope Francis has ever heard the statement “you catch more flies with honey than vinegar”? Of course, if he’s still taking fossil fueled flights, that would make him a denier, as it would all the other CoC members who haven’t gone carbon neutral.
I wonder if Pope Francis can explain this
Doesn’t look like much, does it? A flat line going back from May 2016. If one continued back, they’d see a spike for around 16 years. Then a long slight cooling period. Then a big spike. Then a pause. All the way back to the Little Ice Age. The current Pause mostly invalidates the computer models of doomy warming, hence the reason for the 70+ excuses, along with the “adjustments” to past data.
But, hey, if Pope Francis is really into the loss of personal freedom to the Cult of Climastrology Progressives (nice fascists) based on junk science, he should start in his own life.
Crossed at Right Wing News.
Im not catholic so Im not a pope apologist but I can see why the pope would push global warming.
It is after all redistribution of wealth and it does help poor people in theory.
the problem is that the AGW crowd wants to throw money and poor nations to help them with things they dont need.
Like Fancy Bill Gates invented hybrid generators to help them create electricity for all those cell phones and computers and microwaves those sheep herders own.
I mean its preposterous the things the AGW crowd wants to give the poor in the African Sahara. Zuckerberg and Google are engaged in providing the internet to ff;ing poor nomadic sheepherders in africa so they can get more HITS ON FACEBOOK and GOOGLE.
Good lord.
At least the pope wants to help the poor and Im pretty sure his plans dont call for cellphones and drones…..but His Naivete on the subject is sorely showing and I doubt he realizes that about 1 percent of any moneys sent by the wealthy nations would actually help the common citizens.
99 percent of it would end up being used to buy arms, pad the despots bank account and increase the use of force against its own people.
We tried this in Somalia. Bill Clinton finally had to send the marines and then special forces into Somalia to stop the despot from killing his own people and stealing the food.
Progressives just dont understand the world other then from a jilted nirvana, lets all get along vision that does not exist anywhere but heaven.
Thanks Pope…..I suggest you spend some of that money floating around in the Papal bank account and see how it goes….if you succeed…..get back to us.
The rightwing and proto Nazis have always hated the Pope and are on record for always saying that anyone they disagree with is far left.
People who demand perfection in others of course can always find some faults. The Pope has made the Vatican go carbon neutral. via solar power. His Popemobile is also all electric.
One of the common traits of the elitist narcissist is other-oriented perfectionism
The Pope’s individual carbon footprint is insignificant compared to the change that he may be able to do.
When you have to begin calling the Pope a fascist you have already gone way past Godwin’s law
Ahhh Teach actually you would not see that temp go back to the Little Ice Age
RSS has only been done since sats went up.
However perhaps you could show us how much the temps have gone up ON THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH since 1970 http://www.climate.gov/news-features/climate-qa/why-did-earth%E2%80%99s-surface-temperature-stop-rising-past-decade
Ahhh Teach if there has been only slight warming since 1850 what happened to the Arctic Ice Cap?
But john, you don’t believe the Pope on abortion, do you?
You don’t believe the Pope in his statement on ISIS.
(BTW john, how much of the Pope’s own money did he spend on the solar panels and the Popemobile? Do you agree that the Pope and those working in Vatican City should not pay taxes?)
Get back to us when you can at least be consistent on the Pope.
(I am not holding my breath for that.)
John, no one, including me, is disputing the rise in temps since 1850. I do not dispute the increase since about 1978 to 1997. I even mentioned it in the post. That said, the argument is over causation, no warming, as I’ve stated ad nauseum.
That said, if we don’t have all this hard data going back much further, how do we know that what is happening isn’t totally normal?
Yes, he can. And so can anyone else semi-literate in science. Those that can’t are either ignorant or intentionally deceiving their followers.
Those that can’t are either ignorant or intentionally deceiving their followers.
Kinda like this:
http://www.darkreading.com/noaa-blames-china-in-hack-breaks-disclosure-rules/d/d-id/1317460
350 ppm is the maximum safe number
For comparison, 350 ppm is the highest level that James Hansen says (pdf) we can tolerate if we want to “preserve a planet similar to that on which civilization developed and to which life on Earth is adapted.†More Hansen (my emphasis):
So According to James Hansen…the GAWD of AGW were all doomed.
And another doomsday prediction:
So Jeffery I have often wondered why your so terrified by AGW if there is literally nothing that can be done…..then I came across another SCARY REPORT……
and bingo!!
Progressives are terrified of Mexicans taking over Missouri……now it all makes sense.
Ahhh Teach if there has been only slight warming since 1850 what happened to the Arctic Ice Cap?
Exactly nothing like what you linked. Did you mean to link that? If you did intentionally link that article did you mean to imply that Deniers (e.g., Koch Brothers) had the NOAA computers hacked and corrupted the data and that’s why of all the datasets, only the RSS shows no warming?
“What happened to the Arctic ice cap?” Well whatever it is , John, it didn’t “happen”, but is happening- as in an on-going process. But, anyway, what is happening has happened before, so why are you worried? “The rightwing and proto Nazis have always hated the Pope..” John, back here on earth it’s always been the left that has ridiculed the Pope, and religion in general. Just when I’ve thought I’ve read the most irrational thing from you along comes another…
[…] The Pirate’s Cove – Pope’s Climate Encyclical Leaked, About As Far Left As Expected […]
[…] The Pirate’s Cove – Pope’s Climate Encyclical Leaked, About As Far Left As Expected […]
[…] The Pirate’s Cove – Pope’s Climate Encyclical Leaked, About As Far Left As Expected […]
[…] The Pirate’s Cove – Pope’s Climate Encyclical Leaked, About As Far Left As Expected […]
[…] The Pirate’s Cove – Pope’s Climate Encyclical Leaked, About As Far Left As Expected […]
[…] The Pirate’s Cove – Pope’s Climate Encyclical Leaked, About As Far Left As Expected […]