Obama Admits He’s Been Lying About Iran Deal Blocking Iran’s Nuclear Aspirations

Remember when Obama said this (while putting those who are in opposition to the Iran deal in league with the hardcore Iranians)?

After two years of negotiations, we have achieved a detailed arrangement that permanently prohibits Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. It cuts off all of Iran’s pathways to a bomb. It contains the most comprehensive inspection and verification regime ever negotiated to monitor a nuclear program.

And we see this

And this, which the White House has been tweeting for weeks

Then there’s this

(The Hill) President Obama defended his landmark nuclear deal with Iran, but conceded the time it takes Tehran to acquire the material to build a bomb would shrink to “a matter of months” as the agreement expires.

Obama sought to push back against critics who argue the deal should be abandoned because it does not permanently cut off Iran’s path to a nuclear weapon. Critics say some of the strictest limits on Iran’s nuclear program go away after 15 years.

Asked by NPR’s Steve Inskeep what Iran’s “breakout time” will be 15 years from now, Obama said “it shrinks back down to roughly where it is now … which is a matter of months.” But Obama said that was no reason to reject the 15 years of limits on Iran’s program under the deal.

So, this temporary deal will make sure the hardcore Iranian regime will receive lots and lots of cash, which can be spent on their support of terrorism. There will be no credible way that any removed sanctions can be put back in place. Iran has cheated on a good chunk of sanctions already placed on the country and specific people.

And it most assuredly doesn’t permanently prohibit Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

11 Responses to “Obama Admits He’s Been Lying About Iran Deal Blocking Iran’s Nuclear Aspirations”

  1. Jeffery says:

    So instead of 2-3 months, now it would take 15 years + the time to acquire the infrastructure + 2-3 months to get enough material for a nuke.

    Sounds like a good deal.

  2. Kevin says:

    So instead of 2-3 months, now it would take 15 years + the time to acquire the infrastructure + 2-3 months to get enough material for a nuke. Sounds like a good deal.”

    Hey, that’s what Clinton said about North Korea! Four years later, kaboom!

  3. Liam Thomas says:

    Does anyone really think the USA is going to invade Iran?

    Really.

    Our military forces have been so severely degraded under obama it would take 10 years to get back to a position where it would be possible.

    Secondly…..Obama keeps saying this deal or war….hes the scaremonger….

    Thirdly…why are progressives who say we should stop meddling in affairs of others defending the meddling in the affairs of others.

    Fourthly…….why would AGW truthers like this deal….it simply means more oil and gas on the market further making alternatives out of reach because of CHEAP OIL AND GAS.

    Finally….sanctions hurt Iran way more then everyone sticking their heads in the sand and pretending Iran is NOT GOING TO CHEAT…….

    They get a bomb with sanctions……they get a bomb without sanctions………

    Sounds like another set of lying politicians and their fanboi’s lying to us yet again about the greatness of another fucked up political solution.

  4. john says:

    The same people who are warmongering now are the same fellows who tried to pretend that Saddam was trying to build nukes to be used against us. Exactly what is their previous record on WMD?

    Are China Russia Germany France Britain worried about Iranian nukes? Well why the hell are you so frightened ?

    Now when warmongers who want war with Iran Like Liam and Teach change THEIR lives and go over and do what they want someone else to do, well maybe then I will take them more seriously.

  5. Jl says:

    Who ever said he was trying to use a nuke against us? He was building and obtaining other WMDs, making the “Bush lied” people look like fools. And he was obviously going to use it against Israel until they took it out. “Are China, Russia, Germany, France and Britain worried about Iranian nukes?” Now John, this is so simple even you can understand it. I think. Iran hasn’t proclaimed that they want those countries wiped off the face of the earth, now have they? But they have said that for years about Israel. Comprende?

  6. john says:

    this is a deal that lessens the chance of both war and a Iranian bomb is welcomed by virtually every country on the planet.
    Yes it is not accepted by the current government of Israel

  7. drowningpuppies says:

    this is a deal that lessens the chance of both war and a Iranian bomb…yada, yada

    Hey, Chuck Schumer just called and said that johnny and Obama are full of shit.

  8. Dana says:

    John wrote:

    this is a deal that lessens the chance of both war and a Iranian bomb is welcomed by virtually every country on the planet.
    Yes it is not accepted by the current government of Israel

    Maybe the Israelis don’t see this as a deal which lessens the chance of both war and Iranian bomb.

    Remember Osirak? The Israelis need to repeat that operation.

  9. jl says:

    “This is a deal that lessons the chance for war.” You have absolutely no proof of that. “Iranian bomb is welcomed by virtually every country on the planet.” Poor, John- still doesn’t get it. What other countries think is irrelevant, unless, as said before, those other countries have Iran wishing for their destruction. They don’t, but Israel has, so what they think is relevant. And they’re against it. Proof that most other countries welcome a nuclear bomb and not, say, a nuclear facility, as in providing electricity, please. This should be interesting….

  10. Liam Thomas says:

    Now when warmongers who want war with Iran Like Liam

    Where did you ever get the idea I want war with Iran?

    I vigorously opposed not only Invading Iraq but Afghanistan as well.

    I certainly have no desire for another 5000 boys lying dead in the sand to save anyones ass. Especially deadbeat countries that wont bother to defend themselves.

    MAD works quite well. My only point is that with or without sanctions IRAN IS GETTING THE BOMB..Just like N. Korea did.

    The question is why are progressives even meddling in other countries business>?

    Answer me this….why are we even working a deal with Iran?

  11. OldManRick says:

    This makes no sense. If the Iranians could have a bomb in 2-3 months without a deal, why would they negotiate a deal that puts it off for years? What in the deal prevents them from using the assets that would have a bomb in 3 months? What was Iran getting that was worth more to them than a bomb in 3 months?

    Just because the government says something, doesn’t make it true.

Pirate's Cove