Another day, another bit of nutbaggery from the Cult of Climastrology, via the Dhaka Tribune
Climate change as crime against humanity
Crimes against humanity is a term occasionally thrown around when people want to describe acts of utter depravity and unequivocally outside the realm of legitimacy.
The term, in the meantime, has an actual legal definition: the Rome Statute describes crimes against humanity as widespread acts of murder, deportation, and other inhumane acts of similar character.
A vital question which we can no longer avoid is whether a willful rejection of mitigating climate change constitutes as a crime against humanity.
Let’s see…..”no.” But, if Warmists actually believe this, and this notion of anthropogenic climate change being a crime against humanity has been growing over the past few years, then they themselves are criminals for refusing to give up their own fossil fueled use, etc and so on. I’ve written this innumerable times, mainly because Warmists refuse to practice what they preach.
I’ll leave it up to you to read the middle part, which is amazing in it’s wackadoodleness, and ends thusly
If our current interpretations of the law do not cover a major and heinous act such the oblivious conduct of the leading climate change contributors, and if such acts will cause the death and destruction of — albeit nameless and faceless — millions, then it is our understanding of the law that needs an urgent update.
If human rights laws and lawyers fail to rise to the occasion, there will be other meta-narratives seeking to articulate and redress this grave injustice.
In other words, they want to utterly force a change of law as to what constitutes a crime against humanity in order to cover Hotcoldwetdry. I bet most in Bangladesh, a very poor country, would actually prefer to have the lifestyle of all the people in 1st World Countries who’ve taken advantage of all the things the high priests of the Cult of Climastrology want to restrict in places like Bangladesh.
BTW, all the Warmists hold the same opinions as the repressive, fundamentalist Islamic nuts in Iran.
Even if we accept the arguments of the J Boys and their fellow travelers concerning
global warmingclimate change, attempting to use the Rome statute necessarily fails, because a ‘crime against humanity’ requires actual victims, and theglobal warmingclimate change theorists are telling us that, if we do not take action againstglobal warmingclimate change, there will be victims in the future. It seems that a lot of the warmists have seen Minority Report, and approve.This is getting fairly typical of the left: they cannot simply believe that we might be wrong about something, but our wrong thinking must be prohibited and punished by law.
Bangladesh wants their share of the trillion dollars global climate change adaptation money. In a country with a $150b a year GDP, all stops are pulled to grab for a $100b+ share of the world’s greatest pork pie. Science doesn’t matter at all in the face of phat staxx of American taxpayer ca$h.
46 years ago, 300,000 people died in Bangladesh from a cyclone. Scientists were reported to have a concensus blaming the extreme weather on global cooling.
Whether the concensus is cooling hot heating, Bangladesh just wants our tax collections to go to them. Well, after the UN bureaucrats get their new Range Rovers and 5-Star hotel rooms.
“Scientists were reported to have a consensus …….”
I looked I couldn’t see anything even vaguely pointing to that
Is that a “fact”that just came out of your own head ? In the 70s mass media reported global cooling but 80% plus of peer reviewed articles said it was going to continue to warm, and of course they were correct
Teach Iran? Well Israel also agrees. The only country I know that doesn’t agree is Russia
And now to boot we have Putin hacking the DNC to help his good buddy Trump who at this point gets most of his financing from ill gotten gains from Russia
NobUS bank will loan him anything because of his multiple swindles and bankruptcies
that should read “cooling or heating”
24 Jan 1970
“Scientists agree that in the last 30 years or so, the average temperature of the world as a whole dropped by one-third to one-half of a degree Centigrade”
Heavy storms, great losses, severe weather, crop tolls, etc etc.
https://www.newspapers.com/image/22736066/?terms=global%2Bcooling
In 1974, 22 out of 27 forecasting methods predicted global cooling through the rest of the century.
pg 28 http://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/environment/potentialtrends.pdf
October 15, 1974 Chicago Tribune
“climatologists around the world have come to the same conclusion…”
“drop in global mean temperature by 2.7 degrees since the late 1940’s”
“half a billion people may die…”
“the evidence is abundantly clear that climate is changing in a direction that is not promising”
“monsoon rains moving south
http://archives.chicagotribune.com/1974/10/15/page/1/article/weather-changes-here-abroad-threaten-unending-food-shortage
In 1974, the International Atomic Energy Association said that global cooling climate disasters were the new normal.
9 Oct 1974, Page 25 – The Pittsburgh Press:
Climatologists say: “The total change in temperature has averaged about one-half degree centigrade.. erratic weather.. dangerous monsoons… increased droughts, crop shortages (due to too much cold, too much wet, and too much drought) “We’re skating on a very narrow margin”: Dr. James McQuigg, government’s leading climatologist.
Teach ought to love that cold/wet/dry explanation for predicted crop losses due to global cooling
There are plenty more but that should tide you over. Global cooling was the consensus and all the temperature records showed about 1/2 degree C of cooling from the 40’s to the 70’s.
You will believe in this scam or you will be “forced” to, comrades.