Can you imagine a President Donald Trump being forced to attend this meeting?
(Climate Change News) Â World leaders would be compelled to attend a UN climate summit every five years from 2020, under plans published by the Marshall Islands last week.
It wants a regular repeat of the 2014 New York summit convened by Ban Ki-moon, which saw US president Barack Obama lead fellow heads of state in committing to a new climate pact.
The tiny Pacific island nation’s government believes it’s the best way of guaranteeing the freshly minted Paris Agreement delivers on a goal to steadily raise the speed of global carbon cuts.
The Marshall Islands have 33 airports, 3 of which are military.
Interestingly, this document says that the “historic” Paris climate accord is a piece of worthless refuse
The nationally determined contributions (NDCs) put forward by more than 185 countries are to be welcomed. But even if fully implemented they could still lead to a catastrophic rise in global temperatures of almost 3ËšC by the end of the century. Clearly then the current crop of NDCs are woefully short of what is needed to limit global temperature rise to 1.5ËšC. Achieving that goal is required to ensure the survival of our country and to stop runaway climate change throughout the world.
So, if it leads to a catastrophic rise, then what was the point?
3C!
I’d believe 0.5C, maybe.
These people are shameless BSers
Compelled? Just how does the UN ‘compel’ any national president or prime minister to do anything?
There are, of course, some who think that the UN ought to become some sort of overarching world government, but that’ll never happen in my lifetime.
The UN is pushing this garbage to deflect people from noticing how corrupt and useless they are. From UN troops raping children in Bangui, Cambodia, Bosnia and elsewhere, prosecuting whistleblowers who expose UN crimes, massive and out of control fraud, even causing a Cholera outbreak in Haiti that killed over 10,000 Haitans. The list goes on.
You bet they’d prefer to talk about the non-existent non-solvable “issue” of “climate change”.
Ironically, so would our liberals at home.