It’s highly amusing when the grievance monster victimhooders start whacking each other
At pride events, protests claim prejudice, exclusion
Gay pride marches in New York City, San Francisco and in between this weekend will have plenty of participants – and also protests directed at them from other members of the LGBT community, speaking out against what they see as increasingly corporate pride celebrations that prioritize the experiences of gay white men and ignore the issues continuing to face black and brown LGBT people. (snip)
In Minneapolis, organizers of the Twin Cities Pride Parade planned for this Sunday asked the police department to limit participation following the acquittal of police officer Jeronimo Yanez in the death of Castile. The openly gay police chief said the decision was divisive and hurtful to LGBT officers, which the organizers acknowledged. But Twin Cities Pride Board Chairwoman Darcie Baumann said the decision was made to be sensitive to those grieving after the verdict “and seeing those uniforms brings angst and tension and the feeling of unrest.”
The cops should bow out completely, but, then, that would just allow the violent lefties to run roughshod over each other and other people.
The recent flare-up of racial tensions comes as no surprise to Isaiah Wilson, director of external affairs for the National Black Justice Coalition, one of the few national groups focused specially on black LGBT rights.
He said the broader LGBT-rights movement “has been whitewashed” – dominated to a large extent by white gay men.
“Black queer and trans folks have always been there, but our contributions have been devalued,” Wilson said.
Victimhood Society being victims
“The real test will be, can the LGBT movement own up to its historic legacy of racism and evolve to be more accountable and inclusive of people of color?” Minter, a transgender man, wondered. “If not, then it will cease to be a major political movement.”
They can’t help themselves. They have to be victims and throw out racial grievance mongering even amongst themselves. Get the popcorn.
New York City spokesman James Fallarino said if there are any disruptions or protests during the event, “We’re going to make sure we do everything in our power to respect the people who are disrupting or protesting and to respect their message.”
That sounds like NYC will stand back and allow the same type of violence and vandalism we’ve seen during many other Leftist protests. Have fun, Democratic Party run cities!
That title was intentional, wot?
Lettuce, bacon, gouda, tomato.
I kept looking at the headline going “something’s off”, finally said “hang it all” and hit publish
Our esteemed host wrote:
No worries, mate! How effectively can someone with a limp risk throw a rock, or a punch?
Damn it, limp wrist!
Dana typed, referring to TEACHs raunchy headline:
Closeted gays, especially closeted conservative men, lash out, mock and ridicule openly LGBTQ people. They feel it removes suspicions that their conservative friends may have about them. Not all lifelong bachelors are gay anymore than all over-compensating “macho” men are straight. One think is for sure, those that bully others are either sociopaths or terribly insecure and weak.
In other words;
little jeffuckery
It seems that mocking homosexual stereotypes has an uncommonly large impact on Jeffrey, almost as though he is as much personally as politically insulted.
I, of course, would never assume that such is the case, knowing how often strong, virile, heterosexual men are leading, and defending, the ‘LGBTQP’ movement. Indeed, I am certain that our Jeffrey, were it to turn out that he was of what one government document referred to as “minority sexual orientation,” would be a top rather than a bottom.
Daan doth protest too much, methinks… not that there’s anything wrong with that.
Not too worry. Your secret is safe with us. Quite often caricature “he-men” lead secret lives – not that there’s anything wrong with that.
But seriously, why do “men” like you and TEACH mock and ridicule LGBTQ folks? Are they hurting you? Your town? Your business? The nation? The world? Is it a religious belief, much like being anti-abortion?
We defend any and all that the New Con Men attack – women, children, the poor, gays, Blacks, Muslims, disabled, Mexicans… If you attacked and mocked Amish, we’d defend Amish. If you attacked and mocked Mormons we’d defend Mormons. If you attacked and mocked Lutherans we’d defend Lutherans.
Nah, little jeffuckery just likes to bitch and encourage others to shoot people that didn’t vote for bernie…
Jeffrey asked:
We mock the mockworthy, we ridicule the ridiculous.
And, of course, they do hurt some people’s businesses, as they have sued some Christian businesspeople who do not wish to participate in something they see as immoral.
Is it a religious belief? Yes, of course, but it is also a practical one: men and women are complementary, and two (or more) men or women are effectively incomplete.
We should expect, then, that you will be defending Catholics and Baptists, who were so trashed and scorned by Hillary Clinton’s campaign staff.
But your statement certainly is true! You (plural) very much look the other way when it comes to shari’a law oppressing women, at female genital mutilation, ’cause it’s part of some Muslim cultures, at terrorism, when perpetrated by Muslims, at homosexuals being thrown off buildings or hanged, because it’s Muslims doing it, all things an honest liberal would say he abhors, because these things are being done by Muslims.
By any logical consistency, liberals and conservatives ought to be united on these issues, but we’re not, because y’all would rather attack anything Republican or conservative rather that do something really radical like examine the issue.
Daan,
So it’s simple bigotry. Understood. As far as it being religious, are you admitting that your fundamentalist religion is similar to the Islamic fundamentalists?
US Muslims as a group do not practice genital mutilation, terrorism or throw gays off buildings. We will continue to criticize ALL who abuse other humans – although our focus is on America and Americans. Yes, we would defend Catholics and Baptists from unfair attacks and mockery.
Liberals and Cons are united against the murderous terrorists. But Cons want to blame an entire faith rather than the actual perpetrators.
You are correct that we oppose the New Conservative movement for it’s emphasis on hatred of all persons not white, xtian, straight or conservative “enough”.
Jeffrey cannot have missed the stories:
From CNN, not exactly a right-wing site:
You can follow the link, and if you do, you’ll read that the incidence has tripled in the United States. You’ve been reading this site long enough that there is no way you cannot have heard about this!
Really?
That was a UK, not US, study, but it demonstrates the problem: just like the fact that most Germans weren’t Nazis, the remainder of the German population enabled the Nazis. Most of them had little choice, of course, because the Nazis held the power of the state, but what the Islamist terrorists have found is a safe haven, places for concealment and support among the Muslim populations.
The Israelis, who have been fighting this for far longer than we have, learned this lesson; that’s why they destroy the homes of terrorists, to fight the community as much as the individual terrorists.
According the CDC article cited in the CNN article:
https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Humanitarian/Special%20Situations/fgmutilation.pdf
From the actual data, filtered through the CNN article, filtered through your comment, being “at risk for” has transmogrified to a three fold increase in incidence. What the actual study points out is there are more immigrants from regions where the barbaric practice in endemic. The researchers did not even hazard and estimate of the number of girls undergoing the barbaric practice in the US> CNN also pointed out that both fundamentalist Muslims and fundamentalist christians performed this horrid procedure as a method to control women. The CDC data do not differentiate between incidence and being from such a country. Certainly it doesn’t differentiate between immigrants who were mutilated overseas and girls mutilated here. According to your CNN article there has been one prosecution in the US (still ongoing). You mock an entire religion over one incident? Maybe cuts to NIH and CDC proposed by trump/GOP will help gather the necessary data.
CNN also pointed out that the practice is decreasing worldwide, thankfully.
Your CNN citation:
Note too that male genital mutilation is a widespread practice in Christianity, Judaism and Islam.
And:
13 cases of herpes transmitted to infants in a single American city, and two deaths. Do you hold fundamentalis Judaism and fundamentalist Jews as a group, responsible. Should we ban travel from Israel?
dana,
And let me help you out:
http://www.clickondetroit.com/news/female-genital-mutilation-case-2-oakland-county-women-now-charged
This is an update on the case I cited earlier. They are members of a fundamentalist Muslim sect from India, and if convicted should be punished appropriately (life would be fine with me).
Do you favor the US supporting the UNs and WHO’s efforts to stop female mutilation worldwide?
Thanks for the chuckle, little jeffuckery.
Dnaa typed:
Using that standard we should all mock any religion based on supernatural beliefs, which encompasses almost all major religions. For example, xtianity is based on the superstitions of stone age goatherders. Seriously, do you christies really believe in god, angels, demons and miracles? And the fundies among you want to impose/inflict your xtian sharia on others.