These people are nuts (more at Twitchy)
Powerful photo shows that women aren't the only ones who get periods https://t.co/DDm9AZG4U7 pic.twitter.com/PI4nBjJCjf
— HuffPost (@HuffPost) July 23, 2017
From the article
While Clemmer told HuffPost that a significant portion of the reaction to their photo has been rooted in transphobia, they’ve seen people who have broadened their own understanding of transgender menstrual experience and learned from the photo.
“There are a lot of people who have never considered what it’s like to get your period while not identifying as a woman and I have seen a lot of educational and respectful conversations between commenters on my thread that give me a lot of hope for the future,†Clemmer continued. “My favorite reactions, however, are and always will be the response, I get from fellow trans and non-binary folks who have written to me to say that because of my poem, they feel less alone in the world. For me, there’s no greater motivation and honor than that.â€
As Dana, then I, Â noted on Twitter
https://twitter.com/WilliamTeach/status/889282412118781952
The person in the photo is a woman with female biological plumbing. Regardless of which gender she identities with, she’s biologically female, and can have periods. Biological males cannot.
But, hey, everything is “powerful” in Moonbat World when basic science is fluid.
Our esteemed host concluded:
You’d think that the left would argue that there are only two sexes, ’cause the science is settled, don’t you know, but . . . .
Our honored host wrote:
The
womanperson in the photo is a female, regardless of her cross-dressing, and regardless of what she thinks or feels or believes she should be. A person’s sex is determined by his chromosomes and physical development, period — pun most definitely intended — and anyone who believes he is a different sex from what his biology has determined for him is delusional and mentally ill.We ought to have sympathy for the deranged, but sympathy does not mean we should accept their delusions.
While they’re making a political mistake with their “art”, medically they are correct.
And what you label as “liberal” science is just science. Con Men by nature refuse to accept new findings. Whether you like it or not, scientists are making discoveries every day.
Since none of you are medical doctors or biological scientists you can be excused for your ignorance.
Why do you care so much about things that don’t concern you? Just so you can ridicule someone?
And what exactly do you know about the person in the photo? Do you know the medical history? Did the mother have pituitary or adrenal tumors during pregnancy? Was the mother exposed to androgenic drugs during pregnancy? Rather than scientific curiosity as to why an individual with (presumably) female genitalia and hormonal patterns self-identifies as a male (a decision that cannot be easy), you lash out with ridicule, not just at the individual (who invited the attention), but at your political rivals.
How much do you know about the genes carried on the Y chromosome? How much do you know about gene expression on Y chromosomes? Does aneuploidy (XYY or XXYY) affect expression of the Y chromosome gene products (yes)? There are likely many thousands XXYY individuals in the US alone. There a few hundred thousand 47,XXY individuals in the US.
Look up terms such as “intersex”, “ambiguous genitalia”, “maternal pituitary tumors”, “adrenal hyperplasia”, “androgen insensitivity”, “5alpha reductase deficiency”. While you’re at it, delve into the impact of sex hormones on brain development of a fetus, not to mention “gender dysphoria”.
Little jeffuckery please.
Spare us the sanctimony.
If the person in question left DNA at a crime scene, it would come up as female. Wow, that was hard.
If you have a dick, you ain’t a chick! If monthly you bleed, you are female indeed!