Just like back during previous Holocene warm periods.
(UK Telegraph)Â Climate change may have unexpected benefits for Britons because fewer people will die from the cold during the winter, a new study suggests.
Although many regions of the world will see death rates soar as the climate heats-up, in northern Europe hot weather mortality will be cancelled out by the decrease in cold weather deaths.
In bad years nearly 50,000 more people die during the winter in Britain compared to the clement months. But the new research suggests that cold-related mortality will fall by between 32 and 50 per cent if the worst case climate change scenarios occur by the end of the century.
Of course, the Telegraph then went into all the other doom and gloom from the study, because that’s what Cultists do.
Oh, and they forgot to provide empirical, scientific, rock solid proof that the current warm period is mostly/solely caused by Mankind, but, then, they are cultists, and do not need proof to Believe. Nor do they feel a need to practice what they preach.
TEACH: As an expert, can you describe what that proof would look like? Do you foresee one Eureka! moment or would the proof entail several pieces of evidence that add up to a proof?
If you can’t describe, even in general terms, what “proof” looks like, how do you know it’s already not proven? (Not that scientific theories are usually proven).
https://i.imgflip.com/1ze017.jpg
One bit of proof I’ve been awaiting in vain echoes a famous rejoinder: “I’ll believe it’s a crisis when the people who tell me it’s a crisis act like it’s a crisis.”
How many coast-dwelling climate alarmists are abandoning their seaside homes?
Mc,
Do you judge the validity of all scientific theories based on the behaviors of others?
If you see a doctor smoking would you conclude that cigarettes do not cause cancer?
Not Teach, but for me, it would be climate models that actually made projections that matched observations, that those climate models showed that climate change was driven by the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and that there was a correlation between the annual change in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and the amount of human emissions of carbon dioxide for the same year.
Of my three criterion, none have been met.
And never will be met because there is no empirical evidence that CO2 causes warming in a convective atmosphere.
None.