…is a horrible carbon pollution spewing dog which causes the seas to rise, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is The Lid, with a post on the US moving its embassy to Jerusalem.
Most definitely a Canadian, one of my favorites.
THE AUTHOR
PAGES
Recent Comments
- alanstorm on Boston Mayor, Arizona Governor Declare They Will Defy Federal Law On Illegal Aliens: “Sounds kinda insurrectiony to me. When will their trials begin?” Nov 20, 09:58
- Jl on Shell Beats Climate Cult In Dutch Appeals Court Case: “Except of course the Pennsylvania SC had already issued that order earlier, so Shapiro waited until the second time the…” Nov 20, 08:45
- Jl on If All You See…: “Sorry, J-it didn’t benefit the rich any more than any other group, as all cuts were in the 2% range.” Nov 20, 08:38
- L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! on If All You See…: “The fact that you still spout the same bullshit that cost you the White House, the House and the Senate…” Nov 20, 08:38
- Dana on If All You See…: “The law was changed in 2022, making it such that the President of the Senate has no authority in this.…” Nov 20, 08:36
Serinda Swan works with the UN to help with the climate change problem, among other things. I’ll support all of her endeavors because, boobs.
Here she is dealing with climate change by wearing a top that lets the breeze go through. A bit NSFW
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-6xq3MGQWlns/TqVPm2HVIEI/AAAAAAAAAJo/c0tn8sAfLhE/s1600/ZZ.jpg
I’ll forgive her for her AGW beliefs. Forgive her more if she could get USA or some channel to do like a 6 episode wrapup for Graceland.
“… and doggoneit, people like me!”
–Senator S. Smalley
http://www.latimes.com/politics/washington/la-na-pol-essential-washington-updates-democratic-women-senators-call-on-1512579221-htmlstory.html
Are conservative lawyers really this stupid? In the baker-discriminating-against-gays Supreme Court case, the baker’s lawyers argued that KKK members are part of a protected class.
Don’t think so Jeffery.
The private attorney retained by the State of Colorado said the KKK was not a protected class. The petitioners were never asked if the KKK was a protected class.
The only comment from the petitioner’s lawyers dealing with the KKK is that under the interpretation of the State of Colorado, the State could force an African American baker to make a cake in support of the KKK.
Membership in the KKK is not a protected class, so no, the state couldn’t force an AA baker to make a cake in support of the KKK. If KKK membership was a protected class the lawyer might have had a case.
The baker refused to bake a wedding cake because the customers were gay. They didn’t request a cake supporting gayness. Should a pharmacist be able to withhold AIDS drugs because her religion opposes homosexuality? To withhold birth control pills because his religion opposes birth control?
Hilarious, the most racist bigoted hateful person that comes here trots out the KKK (dem terrorist org) as a support for his retarded (dem) arguments? That is too rich. Racist asshat.
You claimed the plaintiffs lawyer argued that the KKK was a protected class.
They did not.
Do you want to address the fact that you lied?
That is false as well. Another lie.
/i>
Agreed. The baker did not refuse to bake the cake because they were gay.
When you start to make arguments like this, it is clear that not only are you trolling, but you are displaying a tremendous ignorance of the case itself.
Dog? I don’t see any dog…