Trump Offers Pathway To Citizenship For Up To 1.8 Million Illegals

As you can imagine, this did not go over well with some supporters, such as at Breitbart. Ted Cruz likewise blasted Trump over this

(CNN) President Donald Trump is proposing giving 1.8 million young undocumented immigrants a pathway to citizenship in exchange for $25 billion for his long-promised wall and a host of other strict immigration reforms, according to a White House framework proposed Thursday.

In what the White House framed as a “dramatic concession” and “compromise,” Trump would accept a path to citizenship not just for the roughly 700,000 undocumented immigrants were covered by the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program when it was ended. But the proposal would also cover those undocumented immigrants who meet the DACA criteria but did not sign up and even more who would be newly eligible under the proposal’s timeframe requirements — giving legal status and a pathway to citizenship to about 1.8 million people.

In return, the White House would like to see a $25 billion investment in a trust for border infrastructure and technology, as well as more funds for personnel, and an end to family migration beyond spouses and minor children. The diversity visa lottery would also be abolished, though the visas would be reallocated so that the backlog of people already waiting for family visas and high-skilled immigration green cards would be processed.

In what may end up being the most contentious piece of the proposal, the White House is also looking to close “legal loopholes” that will allow it to deport more immigrants, specifically as it relates to undocumented immigrants from countries that don’t border the United States — which would likely include changes in immigration enforcement authority that would be virtually impossible for Democrats to swallow.

They’re offering this with the expectation of getting a lot back. They see it as a compromise position. Now, it wouldn’t mean a pathway to citizenship immediately: they’ve already noted that it would be at least 10-12 years before citizenship could be considered, and the illegals would have to meet certain criteria before it happened, much like as people going through the legal route have to meet. They think it could get 60 votes in the Senate. And, it may very well do that. However, it would mean a lot of Republicans not voting for it, while Democrats would love the idea of 1.8 more Democrat voters in the future.

Regardless, Trump made a promise during the campaign to not give amnesty. And Ted Cruz stated

(Bloomberg) Senator Ted Cruz blasted the idea of giving young undocumented immigrants a path to citizenship, a day after President Donald Trump said he was open to the idea as part of immigration legislation being negotiated in Congress.

“I do not believe we should be granting a path to citizenship to anybody here illegally,” the Texas Republican said in the Capitol. “Doing so is inconsistent with the promises we made to the men and women who elected us.”

“For some reason that to me is utterly inexplicable, we see Republicans falling all over themselves to gallop to the left of Obama in a way that is contrary to the promises made to the voters who elected us,” Cruz said. “We need to honor the promises we made. And that is what I am energetically urging my colleagues to do.”

I’d agree with the plan provide, as I’ve written before, that the people who brought the “Dreamers” have to self deport prior to any sort of legalization, meaning that even DACA cannot begin for any Dreamer until that person who “sinned” in bringing the kids has left. And, if they come back illegally then the whole kit and kaboodle is ended for that Dreamer, and they are deported.

Furthermore, I would like to see a major crackdown on those who hire illegals, and make companies and educational facilities heavily responsible for keeping track of the immigration status of those they sponsor. We need to crackdown on visa overstays.

Providing amnesty in any form isn’t going to earn the GOP any goodwill from Democrats, the media, nor the illegals themselves. It will earn the ire of Republican voters. The question here is, is a pathway a decade away worth it to get tough measures back? There would certainly need to be a poison pill in any bill, stating that if any security/law enforcement type measures are weakened, citizenship is off the table.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

8 Responses to “Trump Offers Pathway To Citizenship For Up To 1.8 Million Illegals”

  1. Jeffery says:

    https://www.snopes.com/facts-about-dreamers-meme/

    First introduced in Congress in 2001 and last revisited in 2017, the so-called DREAM Act (which stands for the Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors Act) was aimed at providing a path to permanent residency in the United States for children of undocumented immigrants. Every attempt to pass the legislation has failed to date, as politicians continue to kick the can down the road to the next administration.

    However, in June 2012, the DREAM Act begat DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals), an executive action signed by President Obama that allowed qualified undocumented minors to apply for work permits and protection from deportation. To be eligible, applicants had to be under the age of 31, must have arrived in the U.S. before turning 16, lived in the country continuously since 2007, be enrolled in school or possess the equivalent of a high school diploma, and never been convicted of a serious crime.

    By the time the Trump administration rescinded the program in September 2017 (on the spurious grounds that it was an abuse of executive power), an estimated 800,000 people — most of them under the age of 25 — had applied for DACA protection. In honor of the ill-fated DREAM Act, and to reflect that they have a dream of someday becoming citizens, they have come to be known as “Dreamers.”

    With DACA gone, the Dreamers’ future once again rests with Congress. Members of both parties have vowed to pass legislation granting them protections comparable to DACA’s, an idea supported by the majority of the American people.\

    Even President Trump backs the effort, having suggested to the New York Times that Dreamers be given a path to citizenship:

    Over a period of 10 to 12 years, somebody does a great job, they work hard, that gives incentive to do a great job. Whatever they’re doing, if they do a great job, I think it’s a nice thing to have the incentive of, after a period of years, being able to become a citizen.

    President Trump’s proposal includes hundreds of thousands of illegal residents who did not apply for DACA status and who may NOT meet the criteria to qualify for the earlier proposed DREAM act.

    • Dana says:

      Jeffrey quoted:

      Every attempt to pass the legislation has failed to date, as politicians continue to kick the can down the road to the next administration.

      Which means that, even in 2009, when the Democrats had strong majorities, including 60 seats in the Senate, the proposed law did not have enough support to pass. That means, among other things, that Congress was more satisfied with the existing state of the law than they were with the Nightmare Act.

      With President Trump’s blessing, I expect this abominable act to pass, if the Democrats cave on the wall. My hope is that somehow the House Republicans will strip the Nightmare Act part out, and then funding for the wall goes back to the Senate, with only 51 votes required.

  2. Jeffery says:

    TEACH:

    the people who brought the “Dreamers” have to self deport prior to any sort of legalization, meaning that even DACA cannot begin for any Dreamer until that person who “sinned” in bringing the kids has left. And, if they come back illegally then the whole kit and kaboodle is ended for that Dreamer, and they are deported.

    Ezekiel 18:19-20

    ‘… The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father…’

  3. Jeffery says:

    TEACH is for Trumpamnesty if it includes tracking down and deporting up to 3.8 million parents of the potential DREAMers, making the legality of the DREAMers a condition of deporting parents who may or may not be here, be here illegally or even still be alive.

    TEACH’s plan is to promise the DREAMers safe passage, if they agree to have their parents deported. How Christian. How compassionate. But what the hell, they’re not people, they’re Mexicans.

    If you turn in your mom and dad to the Gestapo, you can stay.

  4. Jeffery says:

    TEACH:

    Democrats would love the idea of 1.8 more Democrat (sic) voters in the future

    This is a red herring.

    If tRump (R-Orange) signs a bipartisan bill, what makes you think all 1.8 million would vote for Dems starting 10 or 12 years from enactment? In politics, much can change in 10 years. tRump is doing the Con Men a favor as the Hispanic proportion of our population will continue to increase.

    Even before 2050, white people will no longer be the majority of Americans. Terrifying for Cons, right? If tRump can get this voting bloc in your camp, even in part, he’s helping your cause. All those fundamentalist Catholics that no longer abhor the GOP for their perfidies against humanity! Cons in training. You just have to get over your fear and loathing of non-whites.

    The far, far right white nationalists need to understand their distinct minority position in America today, even as you control our White House, our House of Representatives, have a hold in our Senate and a squishy majority in our Supreme Court.

  5. formwiz says:

    Said it before, I’ll say it now, IT’S A TRAP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

    (can’t believe Jeffery gets it)

  6. Stosh says:

    So let me get this straight, if we let 1.8 million illegal invaders stay for the next 10-12 years, we get to immediately deport the rest of the 20 million illegals today without years of court fillings and sanctuary cities. Hmm, worth thing about…

  7. mr. deplorable says:

    If we don’t get a barrier to the south, no of this means diddly. It’s going to be the same as every other time, bunch of broken promises so rich elitists can get cheap labor and screw their fellow Americans, for money. Funny how all elitist’s castles have walls around them.

Pirate's Cove