Remember, Democrats are not trying to grab all your guns. They aren’t trying to take away anyone’s 2nd Amendment Rights. They’re just trying to implement some common sense gun control, you guys. Or so they say, right up till they keep exposing their true agenda, which is to disarm all law abiding citizens
Our National Reckoning On Guns Hasn’t Included The Firearm Industry. It Should.
…
While this movement has distinguished itself from previous calls for gun reform with its endurance, it has continued to focus on the NRA and the politicians and companies aligned with them. This campaign ― much like previous iterations ― has not emphasized the role of business leaders, like Debney and Chris Killoy, CEO of Sturm, Ruger & Co., the second largest U.S. firearms manufacturer in 2016.
“I really think that it’s important for companies to weigh in on this, or even for them to be called out because they are the people that are manufacturing it,†said Aly Sheehy, a Stoneman Douglas senior who is involved in the political action efforts and survived the Parkland shooting by hiding in the school auditorium. Still, she added, “right now our focus is more on the lawmakers and the power they have to change things.†(big snip)
Although gun manufacturers are subject to basic compliance inspections by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, they bear effectively no legal responsibility once products leave their warehouses. And with millions of their guns flooding onto the market each year, collateral damage is inevitable. (snip)
Collectively, gun buyers, dealers and manufacturers fuel a corporate machine whose very existence relies on the sale of more and more firearms. The overwhelming majority of these products are sold to law-abiding individuals, who use them as intended. But the sheer number of guns, as well as the weak national patchwork of laws intended to regulate them, has made epidemic levels of gun violence the norm. (snip)
And this is one of the particularly factious dynamics at the heart of gun politics. Those who support and profit off of firearms manufacturing are often insulated from the gun violence that is in many ways a natural byproduct of the industry. The Springfields of the U.S. end up paying for a gun policy set by its Hampdens. The Debneys and Killoys focus on putting more guns into a country already full of them, returning undisturbed to their well-appointed suburban homes.
Taken as a whole, what this is is a call for demonizing and attacking people and companies who make products that are legal under the law. The only thing missing in this screed is the call to make gun manufacturers legally liable when their product is used in a crime. You know, like we do when someone uses their car in a crime, we hold Honda, Toyota, Ford, etc liable. Oh, wait, we don’t.
One of the under the radar pushes by the gun grabbers is to find ways to drive gun manufacturers and sellers out of business, partly by making it so expensive to do business that they throw up their hands and close their doors. Because this isn’t about going after criminals for gun grabbers: it’s about disarming all the law abiding people.
The NRA, the gun manufacturers and the GOP that they own, lock, stock and barrel, have removed all potential liabilities from the gun manufacturers.
But are there really “epidemic levels of gun violence”? The US homicide rate has actually been halved over the past few decades, so guns are only part of the problem. Yes, mass shootings by crazed white men have gone up, almost always with AR-15 style “amy man” guns, but that problem can be fixed with sensible and tighter regulation on crazed white guys, “army man” guns and magazine size. Does the government have any role in improving the mental health of residents, e.g., paying for health care, including mental health; or more school counselors; reduced stress on families?
No.
Jeff,
Again, another series of very stupid statements and lies.
Yesssssss…. drive the gun manufacturers to the free states. Do it. Chase them out of their old homes in the Northeast, and run them all here.
Interestingly, the president today signed a tariff act on both steel and aluminum, partially for strategic reasons, lest we cannot provide the raw materials for our own defense. Wouldn’t this also apply to the gun industry? Here’s an industry with manufacturing facilities, R & D to refine, improve and develop new personal weapons. Rather than penalize gun manufacturers, perhaps in addition to purchasing their products, the government should be subsidizing them in the form of tax breaks?
Dumb Juan tRump, a question: Why not a 25% tariff on foreign oil? Wouldn’t that help our fossil fuels industry? It might stimulate converting coal into gas!
Another nignorant musing from the angry little black fella yo.
Dp,
Do you really think Jeff is that stupid? I can’t imagine someone that ignorant.
As I saw someone say, if they were to ban the AR-15, we should just re-name them “undocumented-15â€; therefore libs would bestow sanctuary status on them and ignore them.