…is a horrible, electricity sucking smartphone, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is America’s Watchtower, with a post on Rod Rosenstein’s unusual request on Brett Kavenaugh.
…is a horrible, electricity sucking smartphone, you might just be a Warmist
The blog of the day is America’s Watchtower, with a post on Rod Rosenstein’s unusual request on Brett Kavenaugh.
tRump’s history of dishonesty and crooked dealings require a higher bar. Mr. Rosenstein knows things that only Mr. Mueller knows. Perhaps this guides his interest in judge Kavanaugh, who has his own background issues.
#MeTooKavanaughMeToo
And just what might those background issues be, oh nignorant one?
MeToo!
And since tRump didn’t vet Kavanaugh, and the GOP won’t, someone must. Kavanaugh has an abundant paper trail and it will take work to review it all.
And with Rosenstein’s knowledge of the tRump investigation, he may have reasons to be concerns.
Sooo, basically little jeffery keene of st. louis is admitting that he has nothing and that he is full of shit.
Glad that’s cleared up.
Sooo, basically the bignorant little peckerwood of florida is admitting that he has nothing and that he is full of scheisse.
Glad that’s cleared up. But it’s hardly news.
Jeff –
Name calling. Ridiculing. Lying.
You have all the symptoms of Leftism.
Seek help.
I try to never to lie, but admit to namecalling and casting ridicule.
If TEACH decrees that commenters not call other commenters names and ridicule others, I pledge to go along with it.
Here’s what TEACH says in The Code:
.
In this short chain alone, I’ve been called nignorant (nigger + ignorant) and full of shit. Do you consider this inappropriate namecalling, or is it only inappropriate when I respond?
Next you’ll be telling us you joined the Army.
Bwahaa!
Yep, sadly little jeffery keene is the victim here.
Care to share any of these with the class? Or is this just some more of what your trollmasters told you to type?
PS Are you blind or something?
So a tRumpster sheriff arrested tRump’s ex-lover, Stormy Daniels, for “non-sexual touching”.
Now that’s some good fascism! Arrest your political enemies!
Maybe Stormy Daniel’s ex-lover should be arrested for pawing his own daughter’s butt on TV, or getting lap dances from her when she was a teenager.
Great Christian and family values man! Five babies (at least) with 3 different baby-mamas. More extra-marital affairs than you can shake a dick at! Russian watersports! Multiple sexual assaults!
But white Christian fundamentalists love him! He’s almost like Jesus.
Charges against Ms. Daniels dropped. For tRump, the investigations continue.
Yeah, I notice they’re still trying to get anything out of Manafort.
And Stormy got off on a technicality. Considering what a lousy investigator and prosecutor Mule Ears is, you may want to get used to that word.
You really are desperate. And sleazy.
And it’s the law here in OH.
Multiple sexual assaults? Name one.
Maybe you’d like to talk about Gropin’ Joe? Or Teddy Kennedy? Or Willie the Serial Rapist and Pedophile?
And you go around shaking your dick at stuff?
You need help.
A law not enforced in 11 years. And charges were dropped immediately. What technicality resulted in her release?
tRump has been accused of a dozen sexual assaults. Some of his victims are listed below:
Mindy McGillivray
Natasha Stoynoff
Jessica Leeds
Summer Zervos
Cassandra Searles
Ivana Trump
Rachel Crooks
Kristen Anderson
Jill Harth
Temple Taggert McDowell
tRump denies the assaults, although he did admit to kissing women without permission and grabbing them by the pussy.
Other politicians have also been accused of assaulting women, namely Bill Clinton.
Does that excuse tRump’s behavior in your mind?
The “technicality” was that the law applies to employees of the establishment.
Daniels is an independent contractor and therefore not an employee.
Yesterday Daniels tweeted that two other women who are both employees have not had the charges against them dropped.
Little jeffery keene has difficulty reading past the headlines.
Also comprehension issues.
Thanks. So really not a technicality but just the law itself.
Too bad for the other women. Were the men also charged?
Harassing strippers seems like a waste of the police officers’ time.
No, it is a technicality that people who are paid by the strip club are not considered employees. Most people, including lawmakers, don”t know or understand the difference. The technicality, while correct, violates the spirit of the law.
The officers were not there to harass strippers. They were there as part of an undercover investigation into under aged drinking and the selling of illegal drugs. The charges against the strippers were incidental to the investigation.
So the undercover police just happened to arrest 3 strippers, including tRump’s ex-lover who is suing him, enforcing a law they rarely enforce. What a coincidence.
Maybe they didn’t know it was tRump’s ex-lover.
So it was a technicality that the law did not apply in this case.
Yes, it was a coincidence unless you think that cops doing an investigation should not see other violations of the law they may see.
Under your theory, if a person is stopped for speeding and doesn’t have current tags, a registration, a driver’s license, or insurance, the cop should just ignore those laws.
As I explained, it is a technicality that Daniels was a independent contractor and not an employee. The law was clearly meant to criminalize the act, but the law was written poorly.
Teach, you have really outdone yourself.
A fourfer. And all brunettes.
You deserve a Nobel Peace Prize or something. Unlike some, you earned it.