Katrina Survivors Link Reproductive Rights With ‘Climate Change’ Or Something

How many times have I written that ‘climate change’ is really all about Leftist politics, being a subset of the overall Progressive/Socialist/Marxist/Whatever push? And that the Cult of Climastrology will link just about any issue with their cultish beliefs? Well, the abortionistas do this, as well, and we end up with this bit of bat-shit insane writing by Jeremy Deaton (it’s always interesting that Leftist men push abortion on demand harder than the women, eh?)

From the unhinged screed

Katrina, they say, wasn’t an anomaly, but an introduction.

One of the lessons from the storm was that women are at greater risk than men in times of crisis. To prepare for the next Katrina, advocates say, the government must provide more protection for women, including higher wages, more affordable housing and better access to health care — including contraception and abortion which are disproportionately used by cis women.

“This is not just about recovering from Katrina. This is about building a system of recovery for what we know is coming,” said Colette Pichon Battle, executive director of the Gulf Coast Center for Law and Policy at a town hall Wednesday on protecting women from natural disasters. The event was part of the Freedom to Breathe Tour, which is bringing together experts and advocates in cities across the South and West for conversations about climate change and social justice.

“We cannot address climate change as solely an environmental problem,” said Michele Erenberg, executive director of Lift Louisiana, at the town hall. “It is also a human rights imperative, and thus, a women’s rights imperative.” Speakers noted that New Orleans is exquisitely vulnerable to severe storms. This is partly a function of geography — most of the city sits below sea level, making it prone to flooding — but it is also a function of inequality, a matter of who can afford shelter and health care. (snip)

On the link between climate change and reproductive rights, Erenberg said, “These movements share a common concern about the health of families and communities, and both recognize the right of all people to reproductive health, including the right of all women to have healthy pregnancies and to raise their children in safe and healthy environments.”

If you’re thinking the rest is just as insane, you’re correct. It is.

And the most interesting thing of this is the reality that they’re calling for reduction of black children through contraception and abortion. It’s almost like the Cult of Climastrology is rather racist and hateful towards blacks, since we see the same thing aimed at Africa in terms of making sure the women have access to abortions and contraception there.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

5 Responses to “Katrina Survivors Link Reproductive Rights With ‘Climate Change’ Or Something”

  1. JGlanton says:

    I can’t breathe… because I’m laughing so hard! https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_yahoo.gif

    “Freedom to Breath”, really? https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_wacko.gif

    One of the most idiotic socialist statements on their website is:

    Something is wrong when a five-digit number can accurately predict how long an American will live, how much money they have, and how likely they are to go to college. Zip codes capture this because some communities in America face a disproportionate amount of inequalities.

    Errr, marxist idiots, how much money a person has is what dictates what zip code they move to. Try as you might to make this about race and class warfare, it’s really about differences in IQ and making good life choices and persevering through hard damn work.

    I was at a dinner party last night in a preferred zip code where we watched the sunset over the Pacific. People discussed problems with their pools, designing their dance floors, and stays at their 3rd homes during remodels. There were whites, hispanics, vietnamese, and persians. Everybody agreed that the chinese neighbors were antisocial because they buy up houses for investments. None of these people were born into money and into this zip code. Not one. Their parents where all middle-class or lower. A few of their houses are tacky because they grew up with nothing and turned their homes into playhouses. Mostly they are people who turned blue-collar business into success – construction, flooring, wholesale food products, ice tea, importing goods. No fancy clothes. It could have been a scene from “The Millionaire Next Door”.

    The marxists who push the environmental/racial injustice angle are liars. They care nothing about helping minorities. All they care about is taking power from the productive people of the world and putting it in the hands of their political ideologues until they have a totalitarian regime that rules by force.

  2. Jeffery says:

    many times have I written that ‘climate change’ is really all about Leftist politics

    You type it every time you post one of your anti-science screeds.

    It’s becoming more and more certain that CO2 pollution is causing the Earth to warm, likely having more deleterious than salutary effects. Since it’s a global phenomenon warming impacts every aspect of human civilization.

    Do you doubt that natural disasters are more threatening to poor people?

    • david7134 says:

      Jeff,
      No, you are the one wrong and antisciemce. And all your so called facts are wrong.

    • Liljeffyatemypuppy says:

      So when you use words like “deleterious” instead of “harmful” and “salutary” instead of “beneficial” do you actually think that makes your baseless rants more intelligent?
      Noticed Michael Eric Dyson does the same thing and it doesn’t work for him either.
      https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • Jeffery says:

      Indubitably.

      Asking for a friend:

      If it’s credibly shown that Donald Trump paid for and arranged an abortion for a woman pregnant with his fetus, and then paid her over $400,000 to keep it quiet, would that change any Trump supporters support?

Pirate's Cove