It must take a lot of energy to be this Angry and Deranged. Remember this cute and touching picture from 2 days ago
Mission complete. #Remembering41 pic.twitter.com/rXdyXAS4lk
— Jim McGrath (@jgm41) December 3, 2018
Remember when Slate was reliably right leaning, but then decided to take on the role of the collapsing Salon?
(Daily Caller) Slate staff writer Ruth Graham doesn’t want anyone to “spend†their “emotional energy†on the late former President George H.W. Bush’s service dog, Sully, and she wrote an entire article stating just that.
The day after a picture posted by Bush spokesman Jim McGrath of Sully lying in front of his master’s casket went viral on social media, Graham posted an article to Slate titled, “Don’t Spend Your Emotional Energy on Sully H.W. Bush.†It even helpfully included the subheader: “He’s a service dog who had been with the president for six months, not his lifelong companion.â€
Graham began her piece by comparing Sully to his human namesake, the pilot – Chesley “Sully†Sullenberger – who famously landed his troubled airplane in the Hudson River in 2009.
“Almost 10 years later, a dog named for the pilot has become a beloved ‘hero’ in his own right, and he did it for something much simpler: lying down.â€
After detailing the various ways Sully became a media sensation over the past 24 hours, the Slate writer excused “sentimentality†on the part of pet owners … apparently except for those – like Sully – who weren’t with their masters long enough to suit her fancy.
“But Sully is not a longtime Bush family pet, letting go of the only master he has known,†wrote Graham. “He is an employee who served for less than six months.â€
Nor does the unhinged screed drop its tone further in. The moonbattery continues on and on and on. How miserable do you have to be to go this route?
"That dog is NOT cute or loyal"
is not the hill you want to die on
— Prof Dynarski (@dynarski) December 4, 2018
