I never found the time to follow up on the story of a Democratic bill in Virginia that would allow babies to be aborted right up to birth (I often have pre-written posts from the morning which I can post in a few minutes using my phone). This is nuts, and something that should end up in the ads of not just every Virginia Republican, but Republicans nationwide, highlighting what the abortion supporters in the Democratic Party really stand for
(Daily Caller) Virginia Democratic Gov. Ralph Northam couldn’t precisely answer whether he supports abortion until birth and suggested an infant could be born and then the mother and doctor could discuss what should happen next, in a Wednesday morning interview.
“If a mother is in labor, I can tell you exactly what would happen. The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother,†Northam said in a WTOP interview.
Aborting a baby after it has been born is illegal.
His comments come after Democratic Virginia Delegate Kathy Tran introduced HB 2491, or the Repeal Act, in January. The legislation seeks to repeal the state’s current restrictions on late-term abortions. The bill would allow a doctor to perform an abortion when a woman is dilating, meaning she is about to give birth.
This would be the legalization of infanticide
https://twitter.com/noonanjo/status/1090661336026103808
Evil codified. Put into law. The statement his office put out didn’t help his cause at all. And of course Democrats are rushing to support Northam. And, of course, the media goes with the “Conservatives Pounce!” angle
https://twitter.com/AaronBlake/status/1090708004561924098
When you’re pushing letting the just born die, you deserve backlash. Oh, and then there’s this
The Democratic Virginia delegate who has recently come under fire for sponsoring a bill in the Virginia House of Delegates that would allow the termination of a pregnancy up to 40 weeks old, is also the chief patron of a bill that would protect the lives of “fall cankerworms†during certain months.
Democratic Virginia Del. Kathy Tran introduced “House Bill No. 2495 – Fall cankerworm; spraying prohibited during certain monthsâ€Â on Jan. 9, the same day as “House Bill No. 2491 — Abortion; eliminate certain requirements.â€
Democrats have some seriously f*cked up priorities.
See? The Democrat-Communist Party is finally catching on. They can pull the mask of the Deat Cult off, it’s 2019! Not only are they in to killing already born babies but now made it a law. It’s about time. It may even be a good idea to offer a bounty to potential mother’s of say $500 to
killabort their kid. The Democrats have introduced a new way of murdering blacks never before dreamed of by any political party on earth. It’s groundbreaking! What a great step forward to eliminating the blacks so they can introduce their new voting block “Hispanics” to the glories of no cost living on the taxpayer dime and all they need do is vote Dem. Plus, it shows us what can happen if we don’t toe the line.Now the left has moved Margaret Sanger’s greatest dream of negro elimination from early term abortion, to mid term abortion, to late term abortion, to partial birth abortion and now after birth abortion. I still say we have not achieved full toxic feminism until womyn can choose early life abortion and teen abortion. Then womyn will be truly free and the Democrats might finally see an end to The Negro Question.
I read yesterday where our favorite Jew and Nazi collaborator, billionaire and creator/supporter of Democrat policy, George Soros, who has seamlessly made the transition from Nazi to communist proving there isn’t a hair of difference except cooler uniforms, has given money to several groups which are pro abortion, anti Semitic and pro Muslim to show his diversity in anti American hate groups. No doubt the rest of the America hating Dem/Com Party will soon follow. Oh, they are already there. my bad.
That was supposed to be: Death cult, tow the line. I really should proof read better, sorry.
Actually, “toe the line” is correct.
Also, you should read the proposed bill. It does not allow born babies to be murdered by medical attendants.
Anyway. If a mother gives birth to an anencephalic baby, should the parents and doctors be forced to keep the baby alive at all costs? Is it acceptable to keep the baby comfortable for the few days they might “live” without a brain but not use ventilators or infusions etc?
You may not remember but years ago there was an argument about keeping anencephalic babies “alive” using intensive care methods (mechanical ventilation, infusions etc) to enable harvesting of organs for transplant. I found that unethical since the focus had shifted from the welfare of the baby to the welfare of the recipient, even though it could possibly save another baby with a lethal heart defect. What do you think? It’s a tough ethical choice, no?
Is it any more OK to use intensive care to keep an anencephalic baby “alive” to comfort the parents??
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2722973/
Are you sure Margaret Sanger wanted to eliminate Blacks? Trick question. No she did not. But much of what fervent Cons believe is just not true. Sad.
And George Soros?
That’s your Nazi collaborator. Much of what Cons believe is untrue. Sad.
And, of course, Hepzibah has read the entire bill.
BTW The woman who sponsored it has admitted she hadn’t read it and wouldn’t have sponsored it had she know what it tries to do.
It does not allow born babies to be murdered by medical attendants.
Yes, you have to be a doctor to murder a baby. And these people are not talking about anencephalic babies, they’re talking about all babies including black babies, which makes Banu Jeffery a Judas goat, a Kapo.
Notice Fraulein Griese doesn’t link that piece. Dr Evil rode with the SS fingering Jews and collecting their property. Of course Irma would make excuses for him.
PS You’re gonna have a tough time explaining all those pics of her in fields full of burning crosses. Not to mention her correspondence with Reichsfuhrer-SS Himmler.
Thanks for the correction. I thought it was “toe” then I doubted myself and changed it. But when you corrected me I realized “toe” is correct as it is one’s toe that touches the line, not one’s “tow”. Silly rabbit.
I noticed you managed to dig up a “new” version of the history of Soros. Exactly where is that quote from? Everything I’ve read points to him being a Hitler Youth, a collaborator and later a money launderer, weapons dealer and even drugs if the price was right. I’d be interested in exploring exactly who is rewriting history. Probably the same silent cabal tearing down Confederate statues and changing the names of streets named after politically incorrect people. Again, very closed minded.
It’s not a “new” version, just not the one found on right-wing websites.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/george-soros-ss-nazi-germany/
I realize that conservatives don’t trust fact checking websites…
Mostly because they’re full of provable lies. Easily provable.
And, after WWII, why didn’t he keep his real name, György Schwartz? Maybe because he’s a self-hating Jew.
formwiz: And, after WWII, why didn’t he keep his real name, György Schwartz?
His family changed their name to Soros in 1936—when George Soros was six years old—to try to avoid the rampant anti-Semitism in Hungary.
Snopes fact checking …bwaha!
Only a nignorant would buy into their propaganda.
Read the f*cking bill.
SUMMARY AS INTRODUCED:
Abortion; eliminate certain requirements. Eliminates the requirement that an abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy and prior to the third trimester be performed in a hospital.
The bill eliminates all the procedures and processes, including the performance of an ultrasound, required to effect a woman’s informed written consent to the performance of an abortion; however, the bill does not change the requirement that a woman’s informed written consent be first obtained.
The bill eliminates the requirement that two other physicians certify that a third trimester abortion is necessary to prevent the woman’s death or impairment of her mental or physical health, as well as the need to find that any such impairment to the woman’s health would be substantial and irremediable.
The bill also removes language classifying facilities that perform five or more first-trimester abortions per month as hospitals for the purpose of complying with regulations establishing minimum standards for hospitals.
http://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?191+ful+HB2491
You may not agree with legal abortions, but you should at read.
Listen to Gov. Northam’s f@cking statement, oh nignorant one.
Looks like the blowback on this is sending shock waves through the Left if they have to rely on Baghdad Bobbette to try to snow people this isn’t worth repudiating the Democrat party next year.
And the woman who sponsored it repudiating it is the icing on the cake.
Even your incredulity detector should have gone off. Here’s the quote in context.
So, Northam is discussing a situation that refers to delivering a baby with a terminal condition, rather than aborting at the last moment. Faced with a baby with a terminal condition, some parents would choose extreme artificial measures, even if there is little chance of survival, and may only prolong suffering. Many others would prefer to allow a natural death.
Even if the baby has “severe fetal abnormalities,” leaving the child to die after birth is still infanticide, the killing of an infant.
Blow me kiddiez.
Isn’t that formwhiz’s avocation?
No it isn’t “the killing of an infant”, any more than a stage 4 cancer patient suspending treatment is suicide.
Is it your position that “intensive care” level procedures should be instituted on an infant with no hope of survival? Wouldn’t palliative care be more humane? Or would you prefer they be placed on ventilators and bypass machines for an extra day or two? Our technology allows us to preserve tissues almost indefinitely, but to whose benefit? Certainly not the baby.
Con Job: How Democrats Gave Us Crime, Sanctuary Cities, Abortion …By Crystal Wright
Pretty funny, huh nignorant?
Why do you consider murder of a baby “pretty funny”? Do you find all murder funny?
Gosnell is in prison where he belongs. Few would be saddened if he met up with a bit of painful prison “justice”. Eight of his employees, including his wife, also pleaded guilty.
Murder is against the law in all fifty states. Still.
Speak for yourself, Priscilla. Sounds more like your avocation if liljeffy is right.
And it is killing an infant. Just the same as all those babies killed at Babi Yar had nothing to do with ridding the world of vermin.
And a stage 4 cancer patient suspending treatment is suicide.
Someone needs to tell our closet homosexual that babies can be saved and given healthy lives. We left his kind of thing with the Spartans.
formwiz: And a stage 4 cancer patient suspending treatment is suicide.
It’s a natural death, and is appropriate when continued care will only prolong suffering.
puppy thinks I’m a homosexual, female Negro living in her mother’s basement. Others think I’m a communist paid by the Russians. Maybe I’m an undocumented Mexican, whose real name is Manuel Labor (pronounced Lay-‘bore).
Why do Cons think that calling a liberal, Black, gay or a girl is insulting? Is it because you consider those groups inferior to hetero-, white guys?
Anyway, would you support legislation forcing a dying person with terminal stage 4 cancer to undergo further treatment to eek out a few more days of “life”. We can keep a body functioning a long time with heart-lung machines, mechanical ventilators and drug infusions – should we force every dying person to exhaust every option to stay “alive”?
Why do you consider murder of a baby “pretty funny� Do you find all murder funny?
No, it was Gosnell that did. You just find it acceptable because your masters tell you it is.
Murder is against the law in all fifty states. Still.
Not if this passes. so all your righteous claptrap about Gosnell is just a blind to make you look like you actually respect life and the law.
Which, of course, you don’t.
Tell us, Phyllis, how does it feel standing shoulder to shoulder with people like Irma Griese and Margaret Sanger? Do you get a tingle up your leg like Chrissy Mathews?
You’re not only the standard Commie turncoat, you really are sick, mentally and morally.
Another Simon Girty. Or Chaim Rumkowski.
puppy thinks I’m a homosexual, female Negro living in her mother’s basement. Others think I’m a communist paid by the Russians.
You self identify as female (Noire) and liljeffy says you are.
And you’re a Commie paid by Democrats. If you’re paid by the Russians then Trump clearly wasn’t (you must like the taste of shoes in your mouth).
Why do Cons think that calling a liberal, Black, gay or a girl is insulting?
You don’t seem to like it.
Anyway, would you support legislation forcing a dying person with terminal stage 4 cancer to undergo further treatment to eek out a few more days of “lifeâ€.
You support letting the government doing it. Death panels ring a bell?
And the word is eke.
Zachriel says:
formwiz: And a stage 4 cancer patient suspending treatment is suicide.
It’s a natural death, and is appropriate when continued care will only prolong suffering.
No, it’s taking one’s life. That what suicide is.
formwiz: No, it’s taking one’s life.
You can play with semantics all you like, but dying a natural death when life is already terminal is not reasonably considered suicide. It’s something that happens every day. People die. Just because medical technology can keep a corpse “alive” doesn’t mean letting someone go who has no reasonable chance of survival is murder.