Let’s remember what the update NY abortion law is about
Cuomo held a ceremony to celebrate the signing of “The Reproductive Health Act†which expands women’s access to abortions up to the points of fetal viability. It also says a woman can abort her child after 24 weeks of development when “there is an absence of fetal viability, or at any time when necessary to protect a patient’s life or health.â€
Hamada claimed there is almost no reason to terminate a pregnancy in its third trimester and said the child should be delivered instead of killed.
“There’s absolutely no reason to kill a baby before delivering in the third trimester — not a fetal or maternal indication is what we say in medicine,†he said. “If there’s a problem, and there are problems in third trimester, both with the babies and with moms that require delivery, just deliver the baby. We don’t have to kill it.â€
Another doctor called this “evil codified”
I hope most average Americans looked on in shock as New York passed a new law that will allow women to end the lives of their own children right up until they are born — if it’s necessary for the “life or health†of the mother. In this case, “health†is defined so broadly that it is meaningless. In other words, in New York there are no protections for the unborn at any stage before they safely exit the womb. The prenatal journey for New York’s next generation just became far more perilous.
What NY’s update does is so far beyond “safe, legal, and rare” it truly highlights that the Democratic Party is the part of abortion first and foremost. And here comes NY Gov Andrew Cuomo in a NY Times opinion piece
Andrew Cuomo: Trump’s Assault on Abortion Rights Must Be Rejected
In his State of the Union address on Tuesday night, President Trump attacked the law that New York passed last month codifying a woman’s right to an abortion, and he proposed federal legislation to roll back the protections provided by the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision. The president’s diatribe was part of the far-right’s escalation of its assault on a woman’s constitutional rights.
Trump did call out the late term murderers in the SOTU, saying
“There could be no greater contrast to the beautiful image of a mother holding her infant child than the chilling displays our nation saw in recent days,” Trump said. “Lawmakers in New York cheered with delight upon the passage of legislation that would allow a baby to be ripped from the mother’s womb moments from birth. These are living, feeling, beautiful babies who will never get the chance to share their love and dreams with the world. And then, we had the case of the Governor of Virginia where he stated he would execute a baby after birth. To defend the dignity of every person, I am asking Congress to pass legislation to prohibit the late-term abortion of children who can feel pain in the mother’s womb. Let us work together to build a culture that cherishes innocent life.â€
That is what Cuomo and Democrats are against.
It’s worth recalling that in 1999, long before he ran for president, Mr. Trump described himself as “very pro-choice.†Today he claims to be anti-choice, and he shamelessly courts the religious right to win votes.
Too much of today’s political discourse is extreme. But emotions run especially high when politics and religion intersect — as in the debate about a woman’s right to choose. As a Roman Catholic, I am intimately familiar with the strongly held views of the church. Still, I do not believe that religious values should drive political positions.
Murder being against the law is based on a religious value. So is rape. So are many things. Did Cuomo just invoke a religious test? What values are we supposed to let drive political positions?
I just signed the Reproductive Health Act into law to protect against the Republicans’ efforts to pack the Supreme Court with extreme conservatives to overturn the constitutional protections recognized in Roe v. Wade.
So, he signed a massive expansion in the way the unborn can be ripped from their mother’s wombs and have their brains scrambled to protect something which won’t be overturned? That’s a beyond sick take, Andrew.
Thanks to the nation’s founders, no elected official is empowered to make personal religious beliefs the law of the land. My oath of office is to the Constitutions of the United States and of the State of New York — not to the Catholic Church. My religion cannot demand favoritism as I execute my public duties.
So, we could do away with murder laws? Huh. Of course, that’s not what the Constitution of the U.S. nor of NY say. It just goes to show that Democrats will do anything to kill the abortion murder mills going. It is their #1 issue.
Our country is founded on pluralism. The First Amendment defines our most sacred freedoms, including freedom of the press, freedom of speech and freedom of assembly. But the first one listed is freedom of religion. We cannot have true freedom of religion without separation of church and state. And the country cannot function if religious officials are dictating policy to elected officials.
It sure seems like Cuomo is trying to deflect to a position of “you are allowed to have your freedom of religion, but you aren’t allowed to actually practice it, especially in government.” And NY will just keep on killing babies.