I had planned on ignoring this, since climate cultists have done this before, but, it is making the rounds in the media, and, heck, even Bored Panda (which is a good link to look at to see a lot of the photoshops)
They aren't images. They're photoshops based on shady data. Some of them require over 6 feet of sea rise. Some well over 20 feet https://t.co/KIY49M8egz
— William Teach2 ??????? #refuseresist (@WTeach2) October 14, 2021
From the link
The space center in Houston surrounded by a moat; the famous beach in Santa Monica, Calif., completely submerged; a former sports stadium in Washington, D.C., turned into a bathtub — these are just some of the startling images of the future in America’s largest cities without action to limit climate change, according to new research by Climate Central, a research and communications nonprofit.
Because of greenhouse gas emissions from burning fossil fuels, average global temperatures have already risen 1.2° Celsius (2.2° Fahrenheit) above the preindustrial era, but as glaciers and polar ice caps melt, there is a decades-long lag for sea level rise. So a team of researchers from Climate Central projected how much the waters will rise if the world reaches only 1.5°C of warming, which is the goal world leaders set forth in the 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Say what? 2.2F? No. Where did that number come from? Subtract .7, making it 1.5F rise since 1850.
But even limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C will result in flooding in and around some key sites. Santa Monica, for example, will lose its beach at 1.5°C of warming, once sea level rise has caught up. The projections also show how much more the tide will rise in the heart of some of the world’s largest cities and most famous sites if that warming is doubled, which will happen within 100 years if nations take no action to combat climate change.
“We’re expecting, based on our current warming track, to reach something close to 3°C this century,†said Peter Girard, communications director at Climate Central. “It will take a long time for the seas to rise to match that temperature. It may be centuries in the future, but we can understand with relative precision where it will eventually settle.â€
In other words, they know that the sea rise thing is complete mule fritters with this whole “it’ll happen way in the future.” It’s a way to scaremonger. And not have to scientifically prove their prognostications.
And that place will be unsettling to many. Whether it’s an international landmark like London’s Buckingham Palace or a more obscure site like the Texas Energy Museum being underwater, the images of city streets turned to rivers and once-inhabitable buildings sticking out of the water like piers are a striking warning of what may be to come.
Of course, in reality these buildings aren’t even necessarily going to be there if the world breaches 2°C of warming. Long before an area is actually underwater, it will face regular flooding from heavy rainfalls and storm surges — which are also becoming more frequent and severe because of climate change. Buckingham Palace in London and Robert F. Kennedy Memorial Stadium in Washington, D.C., will have to be abandoned due to rising waters unless dramatic action is taken to save them.
Good grief. All the pictures are available at Climate Central (typically, a hotbed of alarmism and cultism). Let’s look at a few
Seville is 22 feet above sea level.
That’s the ball park the Washington Nationals play at. Besides the few feet above sea level, how many feet are in the stadium? The outfield walls are like 9 feet. With the bleachers, we’re talking what, 13-15 feet?
Hoboken, NJ, which mostly sits on a bluff above the Hudson River. I’m guess these people have never been there.
Lalbagh Fort, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Thirteen feet above sea level, and pretty far from the Bay of Bengal. Sure, there are rivers, but, that’s not sea rise. This is replicated throughout this “study”. It’s a cult.
William Teach typed: 2.2F? No. Where did that number come from? Subtract .7, making it 1.5F rise since 1850.
2.2F? Yes. Global databases (GISTEMP, Berkeley) show warming of 0.1C/decade. 0.1 x 12 decades = 1.2C. 1.2C x 1.8 = 2.16F.
Where did Mr Teach obtain his data? BTW, the line fits to the global databases obscure the doubling in the rate of warming since 1970.
They need to provide pictures of these areas crumbling as we will not be able to maintain with the global central, wealth destroying government which is the one and only solution to the hoax.
Do you really think Obama bought a Martha’s Vineyard home if he believes in global warming?
“Doubling in the rate of warming..†You mean up or down? https://twitter.com/davidbellamyuk/status/1447480712119074816?s=21
LOL. Good one.
Oh, you were serious?? Oh my. You know better.
The analysis run from 2018 to 2021 shows tremendous warming!!
So it’s cooling from 2015 to now but warming from 2018 to 2021. And in North America, the warming from Jan 2021 to August 2021 was some 50F!!!!!!
Anyway, remember the Great Pause, which was the end of global warming a few years ago? Good times.
So in other words it’s cooled the last 6 years, as stated. But you knew that…
“The pause, which was the end of global warming…â€. Actually, no, hence the word “pauseâ€. Please try and keep up, J
And it’s warmed in the past 3 years, as stated. But you knew that…
It’s almost as if the tweeter guy went back in the temp record to cherrypick a peak and used that as the starting point. Similarly, the Great Pause promoters cherrypicked the El Nino peak in 1998 as the starting point.
Also, as shown earlier, the rate of warming from 1970 to 2021 has doubled compared to the overall warming rate since 1880. 1C in 50 years. Yikes! Global warming is accelerating. What if it redoubles over the next 50 years! That would be 3C increase by 2070!
We’ll be dead by then but younger generations will be pissed.
At the risk of being accused of bullying a girl, please try to keep up, jill.
What if Rimjob had an actual poiht to make besides showing what a dipshit dumbass he is?
One wonders if he has a point at all.
#FJB
Bwaha! Lolgf