It’s already expensive, and the state of the People’s Republik Of California is requiring more and more be used to replace all the reliable, dependable, low cost oil, gas, and nuclear. So, let’s make it more expensive
Tesla Fights California Law That Could Make Solar Energy Costs Soar
In an announcement issued in late December, and reported by CNBC last Friday, electric vehicle and solar roof manufacturer Tesla has asked employees to fight a new California proposal that could make residential rooftop solar energy more expensive for many homeowners.
Under the legislation, residents using solar power would have to pay grid-connection charges based on the size of their system. The legislation would also reduce payments solar customers in California receive for selling their excess power back to the grid.
In addition to free electricity and a more sustainable lifestyle, the capability to sell excess power back to the grid is one of the primary attractions to solar electricity for many consumers. By selling excess power back, consumers can achieve net-zero electric bills or even receive money back from utility companies.
In a tweet from Dec. 13, 2021, @WholeMarsBlog pointed out that if the new tax rate was set at $8 per kilowatt-hour, as proposed, it could cost some Tesla Solar Roof owners as much as $80 a month for a 10 kW system. Elon Musk replied on Twitter, “Penalizing sustainable energy is insane.”
Let’s not forget that California code now requires all new home construction, single and multi-family, to have solar installed. Which, of course, raises the cost of new homes in California in a state which is already at the top end of cost. And this new proposal would penalize those very same people, along with those who want to put solar on their roofs. Shouldn’t California be doing something to reduce costs and incent people to put panels on their roofs?
And then there’s this
Activists say solar farm in Florida will harm Black community
“This is not a facility that’s compatible with the residential community,” said community member and activist Michelle Rutledge
Black residents in Archer — a majority Black town in Florida with a rich history — thought they prevented a solar power farm from being built in their historical community back in 2020.
Michelle Rutledge, a resident who lives across from the proposed site, said that she rallied the community together to object the construction, persuading their county commissioner to vote down the project.
However, in the summer of 2021, the state legislature voted to pass a law preventing municipal governments from blocking new energy infrastructure. Now, the power farm could be erected in Archer in the foreseeable future.
Isn’t this what Democratic Party voters want? The plan is to build it on a vacant 650 acre farm
“Our families have ties to those types of experiences since the Civil War, Jim Crow, and having to escape,” said Gerrie Crawford, another resident who lives across from the proposed site.
She explained that many families, including hers, have worked and purchased land there since the 1800s.
Crawford also said that many residents in the town are descendants of African Americans driven out of Rosewood, a town 30 miles away, during the 1923 Rosewood Massacre — a racially-motivated massacre where white locals burned down the Black town killing at least six Black residents.
Huh? They’re saying it’s in the wrong location, so, sounds rather like a NIMBY situation to the extreme
“We asked the county government to consider cumulative factors such as compatibility, community impact, cultural significance, systemic racism in land use, zoning, and urban planning, and environmental racism while making a decision,” she said.
Many also pointed to the issue of environmental injustice and racism. Communities of color have often been situated near waste sites, landfills and power plants that can cause irreversible brain and lung damage.
“We support renewable energy. But we feel it has to be a just transition to break the cycle of past injustices in the name of progress,” added Crawford.
Double huh.
It’s simply that your inferior understanding prevents you from seeing the obvious brilliance of California’s tax plan.
The key to understanding is asking the question: who gets the money? If it’s the state government, then the answer is clear: it’s just another tax. If it’s the commercial utility companies, then it’s something lobbyists have pushed. And if it’s a mix of the two, now you know what incest really means.
The average/median cost of a home in Cali is now about 800000 dollars I am unsure what percent a solar array would add but probably less than 5%
That shows just how much people want to live in thst state.
Of course people would rather have an abandoned farm than an industrial sized solar farm. Perhaps a better idea would be decentralized power generation
5% of 800,000 is 40,000 – not exactly cheap.
Plus, they’re proposing to tax your array – so you will end up paying for it forever.
I’m shocked, SHOCKED! that you have no clue.
The average/median cost of a home in Cali is now about 800000 dollars I am unsure what percent a solar array would add but probably less than 5%
That shows just how much people want to live in thst state.
Of course people would rather have an abandoned farm than an industrial sized solar farm. Perhaps a better idea would be decentralized power generation on the roofs of houses?
The Hirsute One wrote:
Archer, Florida, isn’t exactly a new house community; here are a few pics from Google Maps.
I have absolutely nothing against rooftop solar panels, but they aren’t the panacea you think. Solar panels require maintenance, cleaning to keep them at maximum efficiency, and placing anything on a roof is a dangerous situation. Most homeowners would have to pay someone to do that maintenance.
Even in the Pyrite State, they get snow, and they’ve just had some record December snowfalls in the mountains . . . which means that those solar panels are wholly useless until they get cleaned. In the mountain winters, the snow might not melt off until April, which means that someone, with the proper equipment and insurance, would have to be sent onto an icy roof to clean the panels.
One thing people don’t seem to realize when it comes to residential solar electric generation: that is taking electric generation out of the hands of trained professionals, and placing it in the hands of homeowners. Talk about accidents waiting to happen!
Absolutely correct regarding Archer, FL. I have been through there a number of times, just a couple of days ago, even. Rather rural agricultural community, substantially minority population. I suspect the area is changing as nearby Gainesville grows. It is possible that the solar developer is trying to get his paws on acreage before values increase substantially. Another aspect to consider is the converting of agricultural land to industrial. We need farms, large and small.
[…] our friend William Teach over at the Pirate’s Cove, comes this gem of the intersection of renewable energy (there is no such thing, but that is a post […]