Pirate's Cove

Hmm, I wonder if this climate cult piece will advocate for the use of nuclear energy?

How the war in Ukraine and climate change are shaping the nuclear industry

Climate change and global security are pushing against each other in shaping the future. That’s particularly apparent in this week’s events surrounding nuclear power.

Nuclear power plants generate energy with no carbon dioxide emissions, providing an alternative to the fossil fuels that are warming the atmosphere.

“Coal and other fossil fuels are choking humanity,” U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres said on Monday after the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change released its most recent report. “The present global energy mix is broken.”

In the same week, Russian military forces attacked the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant in Ukraine. One building in the nuclear power plant compound was set on fire.

Just another day when the climate cult drags a real world event into their doomsday cult world.

Seeing Ukraine’s nuclear reactors come under attack is new, and especially alarming to “much of the population that equates nuclear with weapons and with danger, and with radioactivity and health concerns.”

At the same time, nations are coming to realize they can’t meet their climate goals with renewables, like wind and solar, alone. Luongo says there was a “sea change” in sentiment about nuclear at the COP 26 climate conference last year.

Both China and Russia are pushing hard to build new nuclear power plants. And the article doesn’t blow off building new plants here in the U.S., next generation ones, which is rather unusual. Most Warmists tend to be dead set against them, which is a shame, because, while Skeptics could not care less about them being “low carbon” or “carbon free”, they’d be great for power, and Warmists should be be happy over being “net zero”.

Having all that abundent energy is against the dogma of the climate cult, though, who want Other People limited.