Looney Tunes Goes Groomer By Pushing Drag

Looney Tunes is a cartoon brand meant for kids. Yes, they’ve done some drag stuff, meant for laughs, much like Monty Python, Bennie Hill, and many others have done. Looney Tunes is not doing this for laughs

Looney Tunes Uses Bugs Bunny to Celebrate Drag Queens for Pride Month: ‘Get Your Drag On’

Looney Tunes — the classic children’s animated brand from Warner Bros. — is celebrating Pride Month by encouraging people to dress up as drag queens.

In a tweet Thursday, which was the first day of Pride Month, the official Looney Tunes Twitter account posted a tribute to Bugs Bunny in various states of female attire — though noticeably not from his turn as Brunnhilde in “What’s Opera, Doc?”

“Happy Pride, get your drag on,” Looney Tunes wrote.

If you’re pushing this on children, you’re grooming. There’s really no reason for this. There’s no reason to be advertising in this manner to children. Leave the children alone. Disney is pushing this for babies, which is more about patronizing Woke wackjob parents. And parents at a North Hollywood, California school protested the school wanting to have a Pride event for for kids

Some protesters marched outside the school wearing shirts and holding banners that read, “leave our kids alone.”

Others held signs with slogans like “no to sexualizing our kids,” “no pride in grooming,” “parental choice matters,” and “our protest is against [Los Angeles Unified School District].”

However, counter-protesters showed up on the scene to support the “LGBTQIAAP2S+” community. Helicopter footage showed the protesters and counter-protesters get into a physical altercation at one point, with the parties punching at each other. Ultimately, LAPD officers stepped in and separated the groups.

Obviously, no one in the Credentialed Media is going to ask why they’re Comrades are doing this stuff, why they are pushing so hard. And then there’s our Woke Navy, which is all in

Later in his message, Del Toro said LGBTQI+ Sailors, Marines, civilians, and contractors were working to mold the future of the Navy and realize the “limitless possibilities of a collaborative, diverse, and inclusive workforce where everyone can live as their true self and defend our Nation from extremism and any threat.”

That has zero to do with their actual mission, which is defending the United States from foreign invaders and the citizens of the U.S.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

35 Responses to “Looney Tunes Goes Groomer By Pushing Drag”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Yes. Leave Bugs Bunny for adults as God intended.

    The duty of adults is to teach kids whom to hate not to teach tolerance. Keep Blacks, gays, lesbians, Browns, women, transgendered in their places! If conservatives can control the children, they can control the future!!

    • CarolAnn says:

      Yes. Leave Bugs Bunny for adults as God intended.

      That comment makes zero sense. Bugs is a cartoon. It’s meant to entertain kids not turn the into flaming homosexuals. Do little kids really need to be beaten up with LGBTXRJ2+&%? If so why?

      The duty of adults is ….

      The duty of adults is to teach kids to be goo people, respectful, and good Americans and Christians (or whatever their faith is) and good citizens. Not to teach them to become sexual perverts. We noticed how you listed all your favorites for tolerance but not Christians, Jews, straight people, whites or non leftists of any kind. Bigot!

      If conservatives can control the children, they can control the future!!

      Wasn’t it Lenin who said ” Give me your children for four years and the seed I have sown will never be uprooted”? As usual you project your dark hateful communist ideas on us.

      Brainwashing kids with communist hate and racist and sexist perversion is child abuse. You are a child abuser. At lleast when you’r not murdering them in the womb.

      BTW, you never answered at what time in the pregnancy a baby becomes a human and ineligible to be aborted. Common man, follow the science.

  2. Zachriel says:

    Gee whiz, Looney Tunes has had characters in drag since the 1930s. Bugs Bunny has long been a drag icon.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Texas School Superintendent Arrested in Sting in Which Officers Posed as Teens

    The Itasca TX school’s superintendent was caught grooming children. Itasca is in Hill County which went 80% for Trump in 2020! How many little girls had Michael Keith Stevens, 47, assaulted over the years? Rather than banning Bugs Bunny wearing dresses, perhaps the TX legislature could focus on real crimes. Stevens was one of seven perverts arrested after an undercover operation with more than a dozen local law enforcement agencies.

    • drowningpuppies says:

      So now Rimjob has a problem with arresting “groomers”?

      #TrannysArePsycho
      Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • CarolAnn says:

      Itasca is in Hill County which went 80% for Trump in 2020!

      So you’re okay with this democrat member of NAMBLA because he was raping the children of Trump supporters? We thought you were in favor of “minor attracted adults” (democommie term).

      I don’t think any of us here want to “ban” anyone from wearing dresses, just doing it in the context of recruiting or grooming children in to perverted sex. You got a problem with that? Nobody is trying to ban Bugs Bunny wearing dresses in the context of a humorous cartoon personality they are opposed to using a beloved cartoon character to seduce and brainwash children into perverted sex at such an early age. Why do you predators feel the need to go after young children?

      You do realize Bugs is a cartoon and not a real person (or even a real rabbit)? He is designed to APPEAL TO CHILDREN an this is using his image for the wrong reasons. Or don’t you think using him to groom is wrong?

      You people just refuse to be on the righteous side of anything. Your souls are black as tar.

  4. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Should America put in charge a group of men who are obsessed with Bugs Bunny in drag, Rupaul, trans Target and trans Bud Light?

    Will the nuRight ever get serious? Nah. That requires knowledge, expertise and maturity, all in short supply in that population.

    Rumor is that Liz Cheney is looking into a presidential run! As an independent. Do the math.

  5. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Milton Berle, Tony Curtiss, Jack Lemmon, Flip Wilson, Rudy Giuliani, Dustin Hoffman, Robin Williams, Tyler Perry, Eddie Murphy, Tim Curry, John Travolta, John Leguizamo, Wesley Snipe, William Hurt, all dragsters.

  6. drowningpuppies says:

    Badabadabada…

    Another hilarious cartoon character

    #DatsAllFolks!
    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

  7. buddhaha says:

    The original Elwood P. Dowd was both amusing and harmless. You are neither.

    Conflating drag in entertainment with pushing sexual fetishization on kids is the tactic of someone who has no other argument.

    I have an acquaintance who is a profesional drag entertainer (and who is as gay as a wildflower meadow) who’s opinion on both Boy Scout leaders groping their charges and gymnastic coaches screwing their students was the same: take them out and shoot them. Normalizing pervert behavior simply gets more regardless of which “orientation”.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Boy Scout leaders groping their charges and gymnastic coaches screwing their students should be charged with crimes and tried. But not shot.

      Does your gay acquaintance, a drag entertainer, equate drag with a crime deserving the death penalty?

      You typed:

      Conflating drag in entertainment with pushing sexual fetishization on kids is the tactic of someone who has no other argument.

      Yes! That’s what many of us are saying. Conservatives are conflating drag entertainment with “grooming” children for sex. Is that really what you meant to type?

      We get it. A few years ago, nuCons hit upon the idea that all liberal Democrats were child molesters. Remember QAnon and Pizzagate? Candidate Clinton was running a pedophile ring out of a pizza parlor. This is just the continuation of that silliness. Why do MAGAts waste their time on this? Two reasons. Because it works with nuCons/MAGAts/QAnoners. And because the nuRight is devoid of useful ideas.

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Speaking of “devoid of useful ideas” just read all your own posts, chubby.
        Your sole purpose is to elicit rage, not sympathy or understanding. STFD STFU.

        #PervPrideRimjob
        Bwaha! Lolgfy https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          I’m not attempting to run the country, the far right is.

          So what are the “useful ideas” the right is proposing?

          Tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations
          Ban abortion
          Restrict voting
          Discriminate against LGBTQ
          End NATO
          Build a Wall
          Defund FBI, CIA, NSA, NASA, EPA, CDC, NIH, FDA, HHS, FTC, SEC, BIA, DOT, DOE, NSF etc
          Defund public education
          End gov’t “socialized medicine” (Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP)
          Raise SS retirement age
          Stop all gov’t climate change expenditures and efforts
          End all left wing discrimination against white Americans and Christians

          Differences of opinion and facts elicit your rage and antics.

      • James Lewis says:

        Dear Elwood:

        “Yes! That’s what many of us are saying. Conservatives are conflating drag entertainment with “grooming” children for sex. Is that really what you meant to type?”

        Please explain what is entertaining about men dressing like women.

        Pease explain what is entertaining about men dressing like a woman and acting in a sexual manner.

        Please explain why children need to be exposed to this?

        • Elwood P. Dowd says:

          Please explain what is entertaining about men dressing like women.

          You need to ask someone who finds it entertaining. There is certainly a long history of drag entertainment. We’re told some find professional wrestling entertaining. Some find stock car races entertaining. Country music is popular. There is no explaining tastes.

          Do drag shows for children involve sexual displays? They shouldn’t.

          • James Lewis says:

            Dear Elwood:

            You are the one supporting drag queen grooming.

            So you are the one who must explain.

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Dear James,

            Sorry James, but I’m promoting nothing other than freedom to dress however one wishes.

            Do you consider any performance a person wears clothing associated with the opposite sex and where children can view it, to be “grooming”.

            Would you please help us all out and describe what men such as you mean by “grooming”?

            Do you believe that children seeing men dressed like women or women dressed like men encourage children to dress as the opposite sex? Do you feel the performers are trying to molest children?

  8. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Do you think children seeing Bugs Bunny in drag is one of America’s most serious problems?

    Right wing media runs story after story after story.

    How does it compare to income/wealth inequity? Food insecurity? School massacres? Street crime? Fentanyl deaths? College affordability? Immigration? Global warming? Health care costs?

    • Zachriel says:

      Elwood P. Dowd: Do you think children seeing Bugs Bunny in drag is one of America’s most serious problems?

      Bugs has been running around in drag for eighty-some years. WWII soldiers would put on drag shows. Family movies often depict cross-dressing. It’s the standard right-wing playbook, a moment of rage to distract from policies such as tax cuts that have little popular support.

      • CarolAnn says:

        Again Zachriel, Bugs is a cartoon character and does funny skits to entertain. He is not trying to convince little boys that dressing like girls is good. Bugs is FAKE. He is not a groomer, a political activist, a leftist operative, a communist, nor is he a sexual deviant trying to normalize sexual perversion and disfunction like you leftists are.

        BTW, why is sexual depravity so important to you leftists? Why is teaching little boys to act as little girls so high on your priority list when we have crime and drugs and illegals flooding our country?

        Do you think America is a better place if we have a bunch of cross dressers running things? Did Sam Brinton make the Energy Dept. more or less efficient? Does Rachael Levine bring gravitas to America swishing around in his fake admiral suit? Or does this type of political theathre make us look like fools being lead by morons.

        Just so you remember once again: BUGS IS A CARTOON NOT A REAL PERSON.

        Right wing media runs story after story after story.

        So now you want to censor what they can run as a story also?

        • Zachriel says:

          CarolAnn: Bugs is a cartoon character and does funny skits to entertain. He is not trying to convince little boys that dressing like girls is good.

          Bugs makes it look fun! And the children laugh! Oh, the humanity!

          CarolAnn: So now you want to censor what they can run as a story also?

          Not at all. It’s elements on the right that want to use the law to force drag out of the public square. Let’s just laugh at them for suddenly pretending to discover that people cross-dress.

          In Shakespeare day, all the roles on stage were played by males, including, famously, Portia, who was a male actor playing a woman who dressed as a man.

          The quality of mercy is not strain’d,
          It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven
          Upon the place beneath

          • CarolAnn says:

            It’s elements on the right that want to use the law to force drag out of the public square. Let’s just laugh at them for suddenly pretending to discover that people cross-dress.

            Why is it you radical leftists can’t stay on point and tell the truth? If elements on the right want to use the law to force drag out of the public square then the elements on the left want to use the law to force sexually enhanced cross dressers into schools, libraries, TV, social media and businesses.

            Face the facts (We know that’s hard for leftists) the radical left finds grooming children to be fine, perhaps even a right. We are not talking about having a drag show for you and me but for glamorizing cross dressing to children in an effort to promote “transsexualism”. The left even promotes doing so without parental permission or knowledge. You know it and we know it so for shit sakes at least be honest. Sorry, we know honesty for the left is impossible.

            Why is grooming children to be trannies so important to you leftists? Why before even the age of reason (usually 16 in most states) let alone the age of consent?

            What is it about leftists that compels you to interfere in every aspect of human interaction and never in favor of improving it?

          • Zachriel says:

            CarolAnn: If elements on the right want to use the law to force drag out of the public square . . .

            That’s an indication of a drummed up moment of rage and a serious threat to civil liberties.

            CarolAnn: then the elements on the left want to use the law to force sexually enhanced cross dressers into schools, libraries, TV, social media and businesses.

            Do you mean the First Amendment? That doesn’t force anyone into anything. No one forced Disney to make a movie about Hua Mulan, a legendary heroine who dressed as a man and became a military leader, or forced you to watch the movie.

            CarolAnn: Face the facts (We know that’s hard for leftists) the radical left finds grooming children to be fine . . .

            Next thing you know, women will perform in public as little boys.

            Only a very tiny minority of people believe that “grooming children to be fine.” And some of that tiny minority is on the right.

        • Zachriel says:

          This moment of rage is actually a significant issue for the LGBTQ community. A new bill in Kansas defines drag (performances that include cross-dressing) as obscene. That would these artists purveyors of obscenity: Bugs Bunny, Angelina Jolie, Tyler Perry, Monty Python, Jack Lemmon, Jude Law, Tony Curtis, Flip Wilson, Divine, Julie Andrews, Tom Hanks, Dustin Hoffman, Willem Dafoe, Gwyneth Paltrow (Shakespeare, a female actress playing a boy actor playing a girl), Johnny Depp, Barbra Streisand, Michael J. Fox, Martin Lawrence, Kurt Russell, Robin Williams, Cate Blanchett, Patrick Swayze, Nathan Lane, Eddie Murphy, Glenn Close, Christopher Walken, John Travolta (a hoot!).

          Not to mention anyone playing Viola from Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, about a woman pretending to be a man.

        • Zachriel says:

          Traditional pantomime often included gender-crossing role playing. That’s why the original stage productions of Peter Pan usually used a female actor in the title role, including, famously, Mary Martin in the 1954 musical.

          You can fly! We can fly!
          Come on, everybody, here we go!
          Off to Never Land!

  9. Jl says:

    Breaking news:”Biden falls to the ground in support of LGBTQ rights..”

  10. James Lewis says:

    Dear Elwood:

    “How does it compare to income/wealth inequity? Food insecurity? School massacres? Street crime? Fentanyl deaths? College affordability? Immigration? Global warming? Health care costs.”

    It is just another problem caused by the Left.

  11. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Dear James,

    “Drag” has been around for centuries!

    It only became a problem when today’s nuCons got a hard-on for it as another wedge issue! We understand how the nuGOP operates. Drag! Trannies! Grooming! Pedophiles! Killer vaccines!

    But let’s put this in the broader perspective of today’s nuConservatism. Over the past decade or so, conservatives have become convinced that white, male-dominated, straight, Christian America is being destroyed (replaced) by “woke” (Blacks/Mexicans/atheists/gays/lesbians/trans/abortionists) America. What we see in red states (and in the presidential contests) are step-by-step restrictions on these targets.

    The ultimate objective of the nuGOP/nuRight/nuCon movement is to solidity their hold on minority power by any means necessary. We naive libs don’t want to believe that our reactionary brothers and sisters desire authoritarianism, but that’s the truth.

  12. L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

    The communist left in it’s desire to promote the exploitation of children by using “cutsey” fags, cross dressers and other assorted perverts has gone so far as to toss aside their other favorite anti American pigs, the Muslims.

    https://youtu.be/S-RAt0G2TYU

    Sad really because the Muzzies were the only friends these radical American hating Americans ever had.

Pirate's Cove