I’m sure Chuck flew commercial, right?
King Charles says world heading for ‘dangerous uncharted territory’ at global leaders summit
King Charles III told world leaders Friday that the warning signs of the climate crisis are being ignored and that the world is heading for “dangerous uncharted territory,” with devastating consequences for lives and livelihoods.
Delivering an opening address to delegates at the World Climate Action Summit, part of the COP28 summit in Dubai, the King said he prayed “with all my heart that COP28 will be a critical turning point towards genuine transformational action.”
“Some important progress has been made but it worries me greatly that we remain so dreadfully far off track,” he said, adding, “we are taking the natural world outside balanced norms and limits and into dangerous uncharted territory.”
Well, if every Warmist gave up their own use of fossil fuels the world would be on track per cult dogma, right?
Referring to this year’s climate change-fueled extreme weather, including Canada’s unprecedented wildfire season, deadly flooding in Pakistan and Bangladesh and catastrophic drought in East Africa, the King told delegates that the “hope of the world” rested on decisions taken at the summit.
Oh, please. You and the others do not speak for the world, especially when you’re all climahypocrites
(UK Independent) Rishi Sunak is facing fresh outrage from climate campaigners after it emerged that the prime minister, the King, and foreign secretary David Cameron are taking separate jets to the Cop28 conference in Dubai.
Downing Street confirmed all three of the leading British representatives at the crucial summit – aimed at cutting global emissions – will each get their own private plane.
No 10 defended the decision to have Mr Sunak and Lord Cameron travel separately – as it was confirmed junior ministers and officials would fly out on commercial flights rather than travel with the PM’s entourage.
So, not only did they not fly together, they sent everyone else on separate flights.
Just what we need. A delusional nutjob who fancies himself a knight errant. King Chuck’s is closer to Don Quixote than Henry 5th.
Climapocrisy!
In one way, I get it: a plane crash could kill both His Majesty the King and the Prime Minister at the same time, but there’s a clear succession plan in place. When His Majesty dies, His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales becomes King; if the Prime Minister dies, there is an interim PM already designated.
Perhaps no one would notice the separate planes issue, were they not all going to a conference in which great promises will be made. Since that’s their destination, everyone notices.
But, in a way, the separate private jets points out the reality: regardless of what great promises are made, those promises will be broken. Why would there be a ‘need’ for COP28 if the promises of COP25 or COP26 or COP27 had been kept?
Actually Teach the dogma is to reduce not eliminate. You created a straw man argument, again. King Charles didn’t go their to say that all carbon pollution must end immediately. King Charles
has never proposed banning ying, he has pushed for technologies for more sustainable fuels. Dogma is more like “any abortion is murder”, which you now seems to have thrown into the political dumpster.
So we are to believe that all you guys wanna do is reduce not eliminate? We know that’s a lie because you’ve been screaming everything’s gotta end by and filling your own data or the earth is doomed.
Well there are some people who believe that any abortion is murder that is not nearly all of us. Most of us just believe that abortion should not be used for birth control. And then an honest effort should be made to determine when the life of a child begins and after that they should be treated as human beings I don’t think that’s a real hard thing. Especially with today’s science. I also don’t believe but trying stop CO2 and fake global warming it’s science I think it’s hackneyed.
But I think for you to continue trying to save the earth but kill the people who live on it is a very noble goal.
LGB: all you guys wanna do is reduce not eliminate
Yes.
LGB: some people who believe that any abortion is murder
True. There are persons in power who would ban ALL abortions if they could. For example:
There are those who believe that a zygote is a human person at the moment of conception – when the spermatozoon enters the ovum. It’s a complex process where the spermatozoon breaks down the outer coating of the ovum, penetrates the membrane, the ovum surface changes to block any other spermatozoa from entering, Eventually, the nuclear materials from the ovum and spermatozoon combine and replicates and the business of cell division commences! Approximately half of these “babies” are lost to menstruation or resorption. This means some 3-4 million “babies” die each year in the US without the potential parents even being aware!
Can one reasonably believe that personhood begins at fertilization but stand idly by as millions are lost every year?
I’d be one of those who would not have any exceptions other than a serious threat to the life of the mother, since if the pregnant woman dies, she takes her unborn child with her.
You’ve made it clear how little you think of women.
Another lecture on morality from the most ethical commentor here at the Cove, Rimjob himself.
Such a clown.
Chicken Little
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Don’t like the laws in these 8 of 50 states?
Move.