DOJ Tells Immigration Judges To Keep Quiet

Looks like the Biden regime DOJ are not big fans of the 1st Amendment. Also, aren’t the judges part of the Judicial Branch, not the Executive?

Immigration judges ‘muzzled’ from speaking publicly by DOJ amid historic 3 million-case backlog

spite houseImmigration judges have been put under a gag order by the Department of Justice (DOJ), stopping them from talking publicly amid an unprecedented 3 million cases waiting to be heard in courts.

The National Association of Immigration Judges (NAIJ) said its members need to get prior approval from the DOJ to speak, per orders from the department’s manager, Chief Immigration Judge Sheila McNulty.

The union had previously been outspoken amid record numbers of migrants arriving at the border and filing claims in immigration courts, overwhelming the already strained system.

Matt Biggs, president of the International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, an umbrella organization supporting the NAIJ, told The Post the order is unprecedented.

“They’ve never been muzzled before,” Biggs said.

I guess Democracy Is At Stake, requiring an Executive Branch agency tasked with upholding the Constitution to muzzle judges. We can’t have the citizens know what the hell is actually going on, eh?

Former immigration Judge Matt O’Brien, who now serves as director of investigations at the Immigration Reform Law Institute, told The Post: “The NAIJ has long advocated judicial independence for the immigration bench.

“However, this administration wants a compliant immigration judge workforce that will find a reason to approve any cases assigned to it. As a result, the Department of Justice has a vested interest in prohibiting the NAIJ from drawing public attention to flaws in that approach.”

Now, imagine it was the Trump admin which did this: how would the Credentialed Media react? How many mentions of Fascism would show up?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

5 Responses to “DOJ Tells Immigration Judges To Keep Quiet”

  1. Professor Hale says:

    Immigration judges are a part of the Executive Branch, not the judicial. Just as state judges are part of the state government, not the federal judiciary.

  2. Dana says:

    Immigration judges are not judicial branch employees, but are executives appointed by the Attorney General.

  3. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Mr Teach typed: Looks like the Biden regime DOJ are not big fans of the 1st Amendment.

    He excised this tidbit from the NY Post article:

    The backlog of cases has increased from just over 500,000 in September 2016 to over 3 million in November 2023, according to the clearinghouse.

    Is it a violation of the First Amendment for a US agency to limit the public output from US employees?

    SAN DIEGO (AP) — A 53-year-old union of immigration judges has been ordered to get supervisor approval to speak publicly to anyone outside the Justice Department, potentially quieting a frequent critic of heavily backlogged immigration courts in an election year.

    The National Association of Immigration Judges has spoken regularly at public forums, in interviews with reporters and with congressional staff, often to criticize how courts are run. It has advocated for more independence and free legal representation.

    The Feb. 15 order requires Justice Department approval “to participate in writing engagements (e.g., articles; blogs) and speaking engagements (e.g., speeches; panel discussions; interviews).” Sheila McNulty, the chief immigration judge, referred to a 2020 decision by the Federal Labor Relations Authority to strip the union of collective bargaining power and said its earlier rights were “not valid at present.”

    Mr Teach typed: … aren’t the judges part of the Judicial Branch, not the Executive?

    Other commenters pointed out that immigration judges are part of the Executive branch. As such, can the Executive Branch arbitrarily increase the number of immigration judges??? If not, why not?

  4. drowningpuppies says:

    Rimjob types a few more hypothetical questions in order to appear clever.
    https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_bye.gif

Pirate's Cove