There’s very little in border security being offered, just Democrats attempting to patronize an element of the moderate Democrat Party and some Independents, maybe a few Never Trumpers. That’s the point of the talking points and the Credentialed Media article
Democrats lean into border security as it shapes contest for control of Congress
With immigration shaping the elections that will decide control of Congress, Democrats are trying to outflank Republicans and convince voters they can address problems at the U.S. border with Mexico, embracing an issue that has traditionally been used against them.
The shift in strategy, especially from Democrats running in battleground states, comes as the Biden administration has struggled to manage an unprecedented influx of migrants at the Southwest border. Donald Trump, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee, has led his party in vilifying immigrants as “ poisoning the blood ” of the country and called for mass deportations of migrants. And as the GOP looks to flip control of the Senate, they are tying Democrats to President Joe Biden’s handling of immigration.
The tactic has already figured large in elections like Arizona’s Senate race, a seat Democrats almost certainly need to win to save their majority. Republican Kari Lake has repeatedly linked Rep. Ruben Gallego, the likely Democratic nominee, to Biden, telling the crowd at a March event that “there’s really not a difference between the two.”
Democrats are no longer shrugging off such attacks: They believe they can tout their own proposals for fixing the border, especially after Trump and Republican lawmakers rejected a bipartisan proposal on border security earlier this year.
Most know that the proposal was complete mule fritters, that it would not get tough on border security and would allow millions more illegals into the U.S.
During most of his five House terms, Gallego had been a member of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, but as he prepared for a Senate run, he quietly left the group. Now he’s emphasizing his work on bolstering the ranks of U.S. Customs and Border Protection and securing funding for communities impacted by recent spikes in immigration, which he calls a “crisis.”
Telling people you’ve appropriated more money to deal with people who shouldn’t even be in the U.S. is perhaps not the best “lean” into border security
Just two states over, Democrats are hoping to bolster their chances of holding the Senate by pulling off a difficult feat — turning Texas blue, at least in one race. Some see a chance to flip a long-held GOP seat by fielding Rep. Colin Allred, D-Texas, against Sen. Ted Cruz.
Allred has emphasized his connection to border communities on the campaign trail and recounted how he had made childhood visits to Brownsville, Texas, where his grandfather worked as a customs officer.
And that helps secure the border how, exactly?
Still, Democrats on Capitol Hill have all opposed Republican legislation that would bring back many of the Trump administration’s border policies, including restarting construction of border walls.
“You’re going to be painted as an open border Democrat no matter what, so talk about solutions,” said Maria Cardona, a Democratic strategist.
She is urging candidates to lean into the immigration debate by discussing plans for border security and policies to help immigrants who have set up lives in the country. It’s an approach that worked under former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, she said.
What kind of security is there when you’re letting them in then feeding, housing, sheltering them, giving them money and schooling and jobs? Seriously, there are no viable policy proposals for this “lean”, other than more money for illegals. Because they are open borders. If Trump wins he should ship illegals to the areas where elected Democrats live. Ten here, 20 there, let them deal with their beliefs.
“You’re going to be painted as an open border Democrat no matter what, so talk about solutions,” said Maria Cardona, a Democratic strategist.
Not if you do the intelligent thing and close the #%^& border, dimbulb.
Leftists are the most superficial people on the planet. They don’t care about results, just optics.
[…] post Open Borders Democrats “Lean” Into Yammering About Border Security appeared first on Pirate’s […]
The Dems are turning to ‘border security’ now that they realize that unrestrained illegal immigration is turning against them, but let’s ask the obvious question: would anyone with even an ounce of brains believe them?
That’s the real point here. The Democrats claims for border security are insincere. Everyone knows they can end this by simply repealing their own presidential executive orders and returning things back to Trump policies and enforcing existing laws. They have already achieved the massive influx of foreigners that they were wanting. Now it is a cheap theater stunt to cry about needing Republican help to make it stop… but not put things back the way they were by deporting every new arrival in the past three years.
I bet Elwood will. How long do you think before Elwood starts blaming trump?
What’s this? Now the MAGAts are complaining that the Dems address border security? Speaker (for now) Johnson refused to bring a conservative bill to a vote.
President Biden is deporting as many as did the previous administration.
The problem, dear child, is that they are NOT addressing border security. They’re simply playing security theater with it. As Professor Hale says, “Everyone (Except Elwood) knows they can end this by simply repealing their own presidential executive orders and returning things back to Trump policies and enforcing existing laws.”
Except for the minor fact that it wasn’t actually a CONSERVATIVE vote, you are correct. It’s always those little details that get in the way…
Let’s assume (for the sake of Jeffty’s fragile ego) that it’s true. When Brandon is letting 5 times as many across in the first place, your argument is SLP. (SLP = Standard Liberal Procedure, i.e. promoting idiocy as if it was meaningful.)
Go home, Jeffty. Once again, you have no idea what you’re talking about.