Vermont Law Charging Fossil Fuels Companies For ‘Climate Change’ Enacted

So glad we elect Republicans to let this kind of thing go into effect, but, hey, maybe he wanted to teach some people about the Law Of Consequences

Vermont becomes 1st state to enact law requiring oil companies pay for damage from climate change

Vermont has become the first state to enact a law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the damage caused by climate change after the state suffered catastrophic summer flooding and damage from other extreme weather.

Republican Gov. Phil Scott allowed the bill to become law without his signature late Thursday, saying he is very concerned about the costs and outcome of the small state taking on “Big Oil” alone in what will likely be a grueling legal fight. But he acknowledged that he understands something has to be done to address the toll of climate change.

“I understand the desire to seek funding to mitigate the effects of climate change that has hurt our state in so many ways,” Scott, a moderate Republican in the largely blue state of Vermont, wrote in a letter to lawmakers.

Or, maybe he’s just an idiot squish.

Under the legislation, the Vermont state treasurer, in consultation with the Agency of Natural Resources, would provide a report by Jan. 15, 2026, on the total cost to Vermonters and the state from the emission of greenhouse gases from Jan. 1, 1995, to Dec. 31, 2024. The assessment would look at the effects on public health, natural resources, agriculture, economic development, housing and other areas. The state would use federal data to determine the amount of covered greenhouse gas emissions attributed to a fossil fuel company.

It’s a polluter-pays model affecting companies engaged in the trade or business of extracting fossil fuel or refining crude oil attributable to more than 1 billion metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions during the time period. The funds could be used by the state for such things as upgrading stormwater drainage systems; upgrading roads, bridges and railroads; relocating, elevating or retrofitting sewage treatment plants; and making energy efficient weatherization upgrades to public and private buildings. It’s modeled after the federal Superfund pollution cleanup program.

“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”

I’m seriously looking forward to the Unintended Consequences of this. What could they be? Will any companies pull out? Will they refuse to sell to the Vermont state government? Will the cost of energy skyrocket, which would cause the cost of food and other goods to skyrocket?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

6 Responses to “Vermont Law Charging Fossil Fuels Companies For ‘Climate Change’ Enacted”

  1. drowningpuppies says:

    Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.

    Funny thing is… wait for it… they can’t prove it.
    Unless they have a Judge Merchan.
    Then they don’t need any “proof”.

    Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

    • Brother John says:

      Hell, with that clown, they don’t even need to know what they’re proving!

  2. wildman says:

    maybe its time to stop all the fossil fuel deliveries to vermont so they can have no climate related issues.

  3. Dana says:

    It’s simple: the oil and natural gas companies will attach a fee to the product they sell in Vermont, so that Vermont taxpayers wind up paying the money to the state government that the state government is trying to charge the fossil fuel companies.

    38% of homes in Vermont are either partially or completely heated by burning wood. Oops!

    First, burning trees results in more carbon dioxide emission for a unit of energy output (e.g., BTUs). In fact, some smokestack emission tests show burning wood results in carbon emissions 2.5 times higher than natural gas and 30 percent higher than coal. Second, harvesting trees for fuel leads to more carbon release than if they remained in the forests to grow or, if they are dead, recycle carbon into the soil. Thirdly, there is a question of delay relating to the time-lag as new trees take time to establish and grow large enough to capture the capacity lost through harvesting. If you invest some time reading and learning more about burning wood, this is only the beginning of concerns; others relate to the reflective capacity of black carbon and other harmful gases released in biomass combustion.

  4. Bkhuna says:

    Oil companies should pull all refineries, operations centers, etc. from progtard states. Instead of a Civil War, we could just starve them back to the pre-industrial era and let nature take its course. There are plenty of places that would love to have cheaper oil, gas, and the jobs that go along with it.

Pirate's Cove