UK Guardian Squees On The Day After Tomorrow’s 20th Anniversary

Does anyone actually watch this movie anymore? It’s pretty much scientifically illiterate, and violates the laws of thermodynamics. But, it was perfect propaganda from the doomsday climate cult

The Day After Tomorrow at 20: a strangely prescient ecological warning

In the winter of 2013, a breakdown in the polar vortex allowed freezing cold air to escape southwards towards the North American continent. As ice storms, tornadoes and blizzards swept across the US, Donald Trump tweeted. “I’m in Los Angeles and it’s freezing,” he wrote. “Global warming is a total, and very expensive, hoax!”

OK, good grief, Trump Derangement Syndrome to start off

It was all a little too reminiscent of Roland Emmerich’s disaster flick The Day After Tomorrow – which opens with US leaders dismissing scientific concerns about the loss of a huge chunk of the Antarctic ice shelf. The researchers are soon vindicated: within days, the melting ice sets off a chain of freak weather events, culminating in a global superstorm that plunges the entire northern hemisphere into a new ice age.

The film, 2004’s summer box office hit, was lampooned by critics and scientists alike. Members of an internet chatroom allegedly paid the paleoclimatologist William Hyde $100 to see it: “This movie is to climate science what Frankenstein is to heart surgery”, he concluded.

Nevertheless, a series of studies showed that the film did sway public opinion about the climate crisis. Twenty years after its release, it remains a unique specimen: a climate disaster blockbuster that adheres to all the tenets of the genre, while also explicitly attributing its carnage to the greenhouse effect.

Well, in reality, the shutting down of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation can lead to cooling temperatures. Some think the introduction of too much fresh water into the system brought on the Little Ace Age. But, then, what about all the fresh water from the glacial melting as the last ice age ended? It really is all theoretic. But, if this all happened, it would be on the order of years for a little ace age, and at least decades for a new glacial age.

Like every disaster film, the Day After Tomorrow is riddled with inaccuracies, cliches, and strange displays of machismo (in one scene, Gyllenhaal battles wolves on a frozen ghost ship). But if anything, the film’s absurdity feels closer to our reality in 2024 than it did in 2004. After all, we live in the age of climate surrealism – it is generally understood that things are going to get weirder as they get worse. Today is the day after tomorrow, we mutter to ourselves, as we read about ancient anthrax-infested reindeer carcasses defrosting in the Arctic Circle.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

8 Responses to “UK Guardian Squees On The Day After Tomorrow’s 20th Anniversary”

  1. Elwood P. Dowd says:

    Some SciFi movies stretch the truth for effect. Warp Factor 6 was about 200x light speed! It would take the USS Enterprise about 17,000 years to reach the nearest galaxy to ours!! But Einstein calculated that nothing could exceed the speed of light. No wonder he hypothesized wormholes!

    • JimS says:

      Sci fi stretches the truth for budgetary reasons too. Back in the days of the original Trek, It was too expensive to do the special effects of the ship landing on a new planet every week, so they came up with the transporter. Too bad they invented some really implausible technobabble to explain it. Eventually, computers got so powerful that even amateurs can do FX work that makes the original Trek (not the 2000s remastering)_ look like crap.

  2. James Lewis says:

    Chicken Little Karen Man’

    Here, enjoy and educate yourself.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-OX-ZNAN-I

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Chickenshit Lewis,

      I don’t waste time watching youtubes, sorry.

      Can you summarize for me or direct to a text version?

      Thanks!!

      • drowningpuppies says:

        Karen (aka Rimjob) is one lazy fuck.
        Typical whining gimmecrat wanting others to do the work.

        Jeez…

        Bwaha! Lolgf https://www.thepiratescove.us/wp-content/plugins/wp-monalisa/icons/wpml_cool.gif

      • James Lewis says:

        Chicken Little Dumb Karen Man

        Nope. you’ll have to open it up and listen or remain stupid.

        My guess is remain stupid.

    • Professor Hale says:

      In the Nation’s capitol, where city leaders decided to take on escalating crime by letting criminals go and just stop reporting crime statistics, all incumbent city counsel members were re-elected. Also getting re-elected, the “shadow-do-nothing” representative Elinor Holms Norton and the mayor.

      Keep voting for the same people. One party rule loyalty is more important than results.

      Just one more reason why no Republican can expect to get a fair trial in DC or any of its courts.

Pirate's Cove