In the People’s Republik of California and other Democrat states they’ve banned books like “To Kill A Mockingbird”, “Of Mice and Men”, and “The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn” as being raaacist. Classic books. Books of consequence. But, those are not the ones banned the most
(Esquire) PEN America, which gathers a broader dataset from school districts, school board hearings, and local media outlets, reports that over 10,000 books were removed from public schools (at least temporarily) during the 2023 – 2024 academic year—almost three times as many removals as during the previous school year. About 8,000 of those bans took place in Florida and Iowa alone, where Republican lawmakers have taken shocking measures against school libraries: in Iowa, a new law forbids any material depicting sexual acts from K-12 schools (excluding religious texts), while in Florida, another new law stipulates that any book challenged for “sexual conduct” must be removed from library shelves while administrators review the material.
It’s shocking to remove sexual material from the shelves in schools? Why do Democrats want children, minors, exposed to hardcore sexual material? I cannot remember any book from the school library or as assigned reading having sexual content. I certainly checked out and bought horror books that had some, but, it wasn’t being shoved down my throat by the school. Why can’t liberals just let kids be kids?
In a consequential election year, your right to read is on the ballot. To show you exactly what’s at stake, we’ve compiled a list of the ten most-challenged books of 2023, along with the supposed rationale behind the controversies they’ve sparked. Share these books with the young people in your life, or enjoy them on your own—each one is a moving paean to self-knowledge, inclusivity, and the strength we find in embracing difference, both in ourselves and others. So go ahead and get reading. It’ll make Ted Cruz’s day.
What’s at stake, eh? Here are the top 10
- Gender Queer, by Maia Kobabe
- All Boys Aren’t Blue, by George M. Johnson
- This Book Is Gay, by Juno Dawson
- The Perks of Being a Wallflower, by Stephen Chbosky
- Flamer, by Mike Curato
- The Bluest Eye, by Toni Morrison
- Tricks, by Ellen Hopkins
- Me and Earl and the Dying Girl, by Jesse Andrews
- Let’s Talk About It, by Erika Moen and Matthew Nolan
- Sold, by Patricia McCormick
Every single one of these is sexually explicit, and all are child pornography. In each case Esquire tries to make a case for them, and it makes it worse, such as
In an interview with Publishers Weekly, Moen said, “Teens are on the internet and they’re coming into contact with all of this and way more. Our philosophy is you can either give them a book that’s been reviewed and approved by multiple professionals in the sex education and health fields, or you can give them a phone and let them figure it out for themselves on PornHub.”
It may be the case that teens are on the Internet, but, should schools, government run institutions of learning, be teaching this stuff to children? Should the teachers be reading this stuff to young children, especially pre-teens, or assigning it as reading? That’s not teaching, that’s grooming. Why is all this necessary? This filth never used to be in schools, which had standards and propriety.
Seriously, “Let’s Talk About It is an illustrated guide to sex designed for teens, featuring comprehensive information about essential topics like orgasms, masturbation, and birth control, but it’s also so much more.” Should this be material pre-teens have? Is this material that should be taught in schools? If the parents want to buy it for their kids, that’s on them. This is not stuff schools should be pushing.
The odd thing is that school libraries are already making daily decisions about what books to keep and what books to discard. There is limited space in every library and for each book that gets added, a different book is “banned” by the librarian. Some group or person is making all those decisions. Someone decided that all those gay and porn books MUST be included and without comment bans other books to make room for them. No one ever defends the books that are banned in this process. Books don’t just magically show up in the mail slot and librarians don’t just put things on teh shelf because they find it on their doorstep. They are intentionally going out and finding these books as a result of LGBTQ activists in the school system putting them on a recommended list. And the library staffs, being good teacher’s union members, always support what the LGBTQ activists recommend.
Why to Democrats pretend to care about book banning only when it comes to defending LGBTQ titles? Is the whole democratic party all in on pedo grooming in the public schools just because the LGBTQ and the teachers unions all happen to be in the same political party? Do the Democrats really have so little tolerance for differences of opinion in their own party? Or is it just that they really all agree that grooming children for predators in the public schools is a good thing?
It’s unlikely that Mr Teach has read any of the listed books.
Please someone point out the sexual content of “Me and Earl and the Dying Girl”. If nothing else you should watch the movie. Same for “The Perks of Being a Wallflower”.
Gay and lesbian kids have been reading “straight” literature and watching “straight” video for decades and still turned out gay and lesbian.
LGBTQ”ism” is a reality and is not “caused” by books or movies. You may not like that fact for either religious or cultural reasons but it’s real.
Should the Bible be banned? Lot’s daughters got him drunk and raped him on consecutive nights getting both pregnant. Lot was both father and grandfather of the kids! Pretty gross, right? We understand that the Bible is literature and not necessarily true. Lot also offered his daughters to the Sodomites demanding to bumfuk the handsome visiting angels.
Chicken Little Karen Man
LGBTQ”ism” is a reality and is not “caused” by books or movies. You may not like that fact for either religious or cultural reasons but it’s real.
Then what is the cause? No single genetic reason has been found.
While scientists do not know the exact cause of sexual orientation, they theorize that it is caused by a complex interplay of genetic, hormonal, and environmental influences.
But since you like theories, especially ones that claim only man is causing climate change, it seems logical that an environment that pushes gayness can/will have an impact. Especially on the young and teen people. Especially when the source of the push is in books provided by an authority
figure such as the school library.
I’m sure none of us has including you. What’s your point? Are you saying we can’t take a parents word for it if we don’t read it personally? That’s just stupid.
As far as the two books you point out again, what’s your point?
Gay and lesbian kids have been reading straight books for decades and they did turn out queer. Now imagine how many more may have become sexually fuked up had they been subjected to books like these. Just because some people crash head on into the left lane does not mean we should erase the double yellow lines in the middle.
None of us believe LGBTQ”ism” is “caused” by books or movies. Why would you attribute a foolish idea like that to us? Because you disagree so we must be stupid? You may not like the fact that either religious or cultural education is necessary for a well rounded education but ass fuking is not.
Really Elwood, don’t kids get exposed to enough filth, perversion and disease without this crap in school? Do you really support increased poisoning of children’s minds by providing what amounts to porn where they should be learning math?
We really can’t understand you radicals sometimes. Other times we do and it revolts us.
The point about such books is not to expose kids to the LGBTQ point of view. That is at this point inescapable. The point is that such books in the school libraries give Perv teachers a chance to talk to students one on one about what they read. Then they get the chance to ask: So, Billy, ever been kissed by a man? It is a tool for grooming. That is why they defend it so stridently.
I wonder which ten books got effectively “banned” to make room on the shelves for those ten. No one cares. Only books that help pedophiles in public schools get defended. The banned books were probably about math, or stories about old White guys who lived in Europe.
I never considered the books I found in the school libraries to be “heterosexual books”. In fact, they didn’t cover anything sexual at all. They covered baseball, history, Greeks, Romans, founders, builders, science and geography, and a great many other things. Sex never came up and it wasn’t missed.
Do you agree the Bible and Quran need to be banned from schools and libraries.
It seems most of the “grooming” takes place in churches and home.
What we need to teach children is how to recognize inapporiate behaviors of adults – teachers, preachers, relatives, neighbors and friends.
Youse guys are worried that a gay kid will read that being gay isn’t filthy or perverted – that it’s part of their life.
Do you believe LGBTQ individuals are sinful, perverted, sick, filthy animals??
Why would we do that?
How do you know where “most of the grooming takes place”? In fact what evidence do you have to support that accusation?
We thought that’s what “Stranger danger” was all about. Were we lied to?
Once again not being one of “us guys” somehow gives you the insight as to what we are “worried about” and as usual you are 100% wrong.
We believe them to be unfortunate people with deep sexual pathologies in need of help. After all these years of us explaining that fact to you it is a sign of low IQ you can’t grasp it. We believe the acts are sinful, perverted, sick and filthy. Why are the two so hard for you to separate?
Are books with a homosexual position pushed in libraries? Yes. I am a retired librarian who worked in public, academic and special libraries for 34 years. It starts with the materials used to order, sometimes databases from the publishers, some times magazines like Library Journal. I have watched the books pushed there swing to the left over the years, from a small but proportionate number to a flood of books with a gay agenda. For such a small minority of Americans it was grossly disproportionate, I thought. Finally,look at the American Library Association president. A Lesbian Marxist. Sigh. Lots of balance there, coming from the top.
Hiding in plain sight.
When I was in High School (around 1970), the most dangerous book in the school library was a little paperback called “Rocket Manual for Amateurs”. If you did the stuff in there and survived, you’d be a prime recruit for the muzzies. I’m sure the librarians never looked at it, if they did, if would have been gone.
BTW, most pedophiles are not homosexual. Many more females than males are victims of child sexual abuse. Men are more likely to be the offenders. Most child sexual abuse offenders are relatives, family friends, teachers or church related. The victim knew the offender in 93% of the cases.
Rimjob: BTW, most pedophiles are not homosexual.
Well, you’re proof of that.
Now that Pedo is part of the LGBTQ spectrum, the differences hardly matter. Democrats openly support LGBTQ AND Pedo. They openly support grooming in public schools and they openly support human trafficking with immigration policy. They openly support surgically and chemically mutilating children to make them more sexually attractive to LGBTQ adults. Even Jeff here defends it. Why do Democrats defend Pedophilia?
Why does the perfesser appear so stupid? Why do ALL MAGAts like the perfesser appear so stupid? They are appearing even more stupid because their new “prophet”, Donnie Darko, may lose again.
It’s not your fault! We suspect they were groomed by their preachers, priests, pastors, nuns, teachers and deacons to be sheep , and Donnie Darko reminds them of the days as children when they were complete under the “control” of these “strong” men making their decisions for them.
This explains, at least in part, why the good perfesser and other MAGAts defend these predators. Even their cult leader was twice sued for raping a 13 year old girl with his good buddy Epstein in Epstein’s Manhattan mansion. As an educated perfesser, Mr Hate no doubt understands that the head of their cult is properly labeled a hebephile and ephebophile. Most conservative men of all ages are active ephehbophiles desiring sex with teenage girls.
Remember perfesser, all of these grouwn-ups SHOULD have been your protectors (like Donnie is the protector of women) instead they used you for THEIR needs. Much like Donnie is using you today.
It’s not your fault. MAGAts are like those children being controlled by church elders. It’s embedded deep in your psyche, but you cannot heal until you recognize it.
Ask Porter.
Our sodomist apologist from St Louis wrote:
I know that our friends on the left like to claim this, but we do have some actual statistics which dispute that claim. The John Jay Report on sexual abuse by priests and deacons, 1950-2002, went through all of the documented data, from all sources, including church files.
The percentage of homosexuals within the priesthood are all over the place, but they range from 15% to 50%. Let’s take the highest number, 50%, because the numbers get worse as the percentage of homosexuals decreases.
The report found that 81% of the victims were male, and only 19% female. Boys were, in effect, four times more likely to have been abused than girls. If 81% of the clergy were homosexual, than heterosexual and homosexual priests abused at the same rate. However, if only 40% of priests were homosexual, then homosexual priests were twice as likely to abuse minors than heterosexual ones. If the percentage is only 20%, then homosexual priests were four times as likely to abuse than normal ones. At 50%, the top of the estimates, homosexual priests were 1.75 times more likely to be abusive.
There’s more:
In other words, rather than being pedophiles in the strictest sense of the word, the abusers were primarily chickenhawks, homosexual males who are looking for young meat, but not prepubescent boys.
The same is true of the heterosexual abusers: they, too, preferred children who were beginning to develop their sexual characteristics; only 6% of all victims were 7 and younger.
You have a statistical problem in your argument. In stating that “most pedophiles are not homosexual. Many more females than males are victims of child sexual abuse,” you are ignoring the fact that, in the general population, normal people outnumber homosexuals roughly 96% to 4%. Unless 96% or more of the victims of male abusers are female, then homosexual males abuse minors at a higher rate than heterosexuals.
The last statistics I could find stated that 82% of all sexual abuse victims are girls, but unless the percentage of homosexuals in the population is 18%, we’re looking at a higher percentage of boys being molested that could be accounted for by the low percentage of homosexuals in the population. That’s a generalized statement, because the statistics of male on male abuse just don’t seem to be published anywhere. It seems that those statistics are just way, way, way too politically incorrect to publish.
And now that the LGBTQ mafia has taken over the institutions through their affiliation with the Democratic party, expect those statistics to be harder and harder to find, if not totally suppressed or fabricated altogether. Like Moslem crime in Europe, it will be illegal to notice it and a criminal offense to suggest LGBTQ people are child molesters, even as they openly add “minor attracted persons” to the spectrum.
Our resident apologist for the Roman Catholic Pederasty Association gives us data about priests. As “imperfect” as the one true church is with their rampant child sexual abuse, that’s only part of the problem. Does Catholicism create child sexual abuse?
Since females are 4-5 times more likely to be victims of child sexual abuse it makes sense that the offenders are males.
Even in adults most rapes are male offenders and female victims.
The only issue more baffling than being a Trump supporter is one still being associated with the church, although the two have much in common.
Is your point that men are overrepresented in sexual abuse claims? Certainly that is true.
From the pedophile himself, the expert Rimjob. They’re so lucky to have you at DJThree Concultants LLC. Both a con and a cultist.
Our self-proclaimed agnostic wrote:
If you were a regular reader of my poor site, you would know that I have said, several times, that we need a heterosexually married priesthood, priests who can satisfy their sexual urges with adult women to whom they are married. That isn’t a perfect solution, and it has its own problems — many rectories simply aren’t built with families in mind — but it would reduce the percentage of homosexual priests in the Church.
The Pope and hierarchy haven’t seriously considered that, but they have fully recognized that the problem with sexually abusive priests has been primarily a homosexual problem, as His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI, reiterated by Pope Francis, have put in place regulations to keep queers out of seminary formation, though we don’t really know just how diligently those regulations have been enforced.
And yet you still support an organization with a long history of abusing children, no doubt with millions of victims. A study of 3000 French Catholic priests found and estimated 216,000 victims since 1950.
What hold do these organizations have on their worshippers? The organizations have not been the most responsible in dealing with this endemic problem, have they? Are their any institutional crimes so heinous that would cause a member to abandon their church organization? If not the institutional abuse of children and an institutional cover-up for decades, than what??
This is not to say that the problem is JUST one of the Roman Catholic church. I learned of a Lutheran minister I knew who had been discovered abusing teen boys in his charge, trading drugs for sex acts, but instead of prison he was moved around. He died recently in SC. A newspaper article included interviews with several of his victims, now adults and many with significant problems of their own, drug use, arrests etc.
And it’s not just a problem of churches. Any organization responsible for the care of children – schools, scouting, sports teams…
Men ARE most of the offenders, just as men are responsbile for almost all adult sexual assaults.
Mr Dana hates homosexuals, especially homosexual men. He echoes the Teachings of his Church that homosexuality is sinful, yet the worst child sexual abuse scandal in world history occurred in their charge – and is ongoing.
The Holy Roman Catholic Church considers priests as direct extensions of Jesus, who was himself unmarried, presumed asexual, and surrounded himself with male apostles.
The distinguished Mr Dowd wrote:
Yes, I can see why our man in Missouri is upset about his long association with the Democratic Party, with their electoral cheating — in 2008, there were 57 entire precincts in Philadelphia in which John McCain got zero votes, followed in 2012 in which Mitt Romney got zero votes — there long tolerance of people like Rep Gary Studds (D-MA), who molested an underaged male page while in Congress, and the appropriately-named Anthony Weiner (D-NY).
But, as a self-proclaimed agnostic, I can understand why Mr Dowd just doesn’t get it: you have to be open to the presence of God to feel the presence of God. I have been open to the presence of God and have felt the presence of God, and apparently Mr Dowd has not been.
St Thomas Aquinas said, “To one who has faith, no explanation is necessary. To one without faith, no explanation is possible.” The most that I can tell you is that, in mid 1994, I was about to walk out the door to do something really terrible. I was alone at home, had my left hand on the front doorknob to open in, when God put his hand on my right shoulder and told me not to do it.
It was as clear as day. There was no one at home with me, but I was not alone. Our skeptic from St Louis will shake his head, and explain that I must have had a pang of conscience or that perhaps I was startled by a car backfiring as it drove past the house or something like that, but he wasn’t there, and I was. I knew what had happened, instantly, and that moment remains seared into my consciousness.
I believe you.
The skeptic from St Louis wrote:
We do not presume Jesus to have been asexual; we simply believe that he was never married.
Catholic priests were mostly married until the 12th century. St Paul told us in 1 Timothy 3:2-5 that deacons and bishops must be the husband of only one wife, so there’s nothing in the Bible which states that priests cannot be married. We know that St Peter, the first Pope, at least had been married, because Matthew 8:14-17 mentions Peter’s mother-in-law, and 1 Corinthians 9:5 notes that Cephus’ (Peter’s) wife traveled with him.
Priestly celibacy was established in significant part because some wealthier priests had been passing their benefices on to their sons, and the Church was addressing this scandal.
Celibacy is required only of priests in the Roman rite; there are Eastern Catholics — Greeks and Ukrainians — with a married priesthood, and there are roughly 200 married former Anglican priests who have converted to Catholicism and have been ordained as Catholic priests in the Roman Catholic Church.
The only issue more baffling than being a Harris/Walz supporter is one still being associated with the democrat party, although the two have much in common. They both have gone full communist and both wave virtue flags while supporting sex criminals, perverts and baby killers. Oh. and Sean Diddy, Jeff Epstein and the other perverts they represent and defend.
In case you’re too blind to see (not an unusual handicap for you) the vast majority of sex crimes by priests are homosexual. It’s the fags what rape and groom chil’ren moron.
LGB,
P Diddy and Jeffrey Epstein are/were good buddies of Donald J Trump. In fact, Trump was sued twice by a 13 yr old girl accusing Trump and Epstein of raping her in Epstein’s Manhattan mansion. Trump either paid her off or threatened her off. You pick.
There are several pictures of Trump groping his then teen daughter. Trump has made it clear that he’s attracted to girls from about 12 years old and up. It’s just as clear that Melania (54) has “aged out”, hence his new travel companion, Laura Loomer (31). Big Donnie’s still got it!!
Almost all child sexual abusers in the US are Christians. Many gay, many not.
So, what’s YOUR potential solution to child sexual abuse by Catholic priests, rabbis, Protestant ministers, etc? We fully understand you have your own personal reasons for hating homosexuals but how do you stop child sexual abuse?
From the ‘holier than thou’ Rimjob of DJThree Consultants LLC.
Ya know the one rumored to have serially assraped his prepubescent grandson.
Preach it, perv.
You need to produce verifiable evidence for your filthy and reckless accusations. I’m not saying they’re not true because I realize people of money and power pull off all kinds of shit but you have to admit the dems make this crap a lifestyle. I have never seen nor heard Trump say “15 years and up” but you seem to be deeper into the world of porno. I’m still young and handsome so unlike you I don’t need to watch that crap and wank. I’ve never seen Trump “groping his teen daughter” neither have I heard or read it before you put it out there. However, we all heard about biden showering with his 10 year old daughter.
Where on earth would you come up with that statistic? The official commie book of Christian pedos? I’ve never seen any stats on crime or criminals by religion, have you? And if you want to accuse Christians make sure they’re not in name only.
How stupid/blind/prejudice can you be? In my reply to YOU September 26, 2024 at 11:24 am I again pointed out to you “After all these years of us explaining that fact to you it is a sign of low IQ you can’t grasp it. We believe the acts are sinful, perverted, sick and filthy. Why are the two so hard for you to separate?”
None of us here hate homosexuals. Can’t you understand that? Just like we don’t hate democrat or even leftists. We hate the shit they believe in and we hate the sexual perversions homosexuals participate in.
We really can’t figure out why it’s so hard for you to separate the sin from the sinner. Just like most radical leftists you hate Trump so you find it necessary to hat his supporters too.
This leads me to believe that the vow of chastity has no basis other than economic expedience. If you goal is to reduce the number of Homosexuals in the clergy, how about screening for that and not letting them in. How about dismissing them as soon as they are discovered?
I’m not in your club but I recognize your sect as brothers and sisters of my own so I care about the problems that afflict you. In my view, your problems have plagued you since the founding of the church and they are a sad blemish on the 2000 year record of charity and service to God and humanity. This latest issue is not related to chastity, but directly fall from the lack of it and the open attempt by the Soviet Union to undermine the church by infesting it with homosexuals at every level back in the 70’s. Those people rose through the ranks in seminaries, regional counsels and the Vatican hierarchy. The problem is Homosexual, not chastity. Chaste men don’t turn to homosexuality because they can’t get women. They cheat and have sex with women. Your part of the Church has been too lenient with child molesters and homosexuals precisely because that fits the mission to undermine the church that those old Soviet masters gave to those homosexual priest so long ago. Even back then, before they had an LGBTQ acronym, the communists knew that all sexual deviants are alike under the skin. Gay men, trans-people, child molesters, all the same. Just different colors on the spectrum.
If your sect wishes to review their celibacy requirement, they should have a better reason than merely to reduce homosexuality or child molestation. Similarly, they should have had a better reason to establish it than economic necessity to safeguard church wealth and property from inheritance and child support issues.
Permitting married priests might help the recruitment problems and establish better empathy between clergy and layity. It will do nothing to reduce homosexuality in the church because those people are not going to change their preferences just because someone sets a better example.
[…] Man the Left REALLY want kids reading porn […]