I mean, if this was real we could totally solve it by all the Warmists giving up their own use of fossil fuels and making their lives carbon neutral. How many fossil fueled flights and SUV rides has Kamala taking this year alone? Anyhow, it’s always some hot take from the Cult of
Milton shows a Harris victory is needed to combat ‘climate carnage’
The recent rapid succession of environmental disasters means it’s time to rebrand “climate change” as “climate carnage.”
That’s the first step towards making the problem a hot button issue in American politics like abortion and immigration. The second step is action which will prove difficult to come by.
The cult has been trying to make this a hot button issue since 1988. And, it is, when it is theoretical. When it comes to real world concerns “climate carnage” is always low hanging fruit. What followed is lots of whining about natural disasters, which have always happened, and blaming it on a slight increase since 1850 of global temperatures, something that has happened multiple times during the Holocene alone
Meanwhile, Kamala Harris has ably defended President Biden’ strong record of accomplishment in the fight against climate carnage. The Inflation Reduction Act, which passed despite intense Republican opposition, is a groundbreaking first step in the battle against climate carnage. The administration’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act stimulated the growth of a clean energy foundation for economic growth through the 21st century.
If we win the war against climate catastrophes, Americans and people across the world will honor Biden as a visionary and pioneer. If we lose the war, people will ask why we didn’t listen to him.
Sadly, the immediate prospect for aggressive American action against climate change is grim. The problem will just get worse until environmental groups and green citizen activists are able to put climate on the front burner of electoral politics.
Would these be the same ones who rarely changed their lives to match their doomsaying?
A Harris victory would keep the fight alive, but there would be constraints on her environmental activism. The real prospect of a closely contested election is that the two parties will share power in a divided Congress which will hinder the passage of a Democratic environmental agenda that might save America and the world from catastrophic weather disasters.
In other words, democracy needs to go.
Also, the screed writer, Brad Bannon, is a Demorat pollster. Aren’t we only supposed to listen to people with climate degrees?
