Bummer: Gen Z Indoctrinated Into Have Climate (scam) Anxiety

Seriously, why is this not considered child abuse? Gen Z, just like a lot of Millennials, were indoctrinated in government run schools over climate doom, and all the fearmongering has turned them into mental messes. If a parent treated their children this poorly they’d be taken by the state and the parents charged

A wave of climate-change anxiety has spread amongst Gen Z. Here are the U.S. states where they’re most and least distressed.

Medical journal The Lancet surveyed almost 16,000 16- to 25-year-olds from each state in the U.S.—and found the kids are quite simply not alright. A whopping 85% report being concerned about climate change, a worry that remains high across all political parties.

Blame the climate cult Lancet, teachers, politicians, and the media

Climate change evokes feelings of anxiety (65.8%), powerlessness (65.8%), and fear (65.1%) among the youth—fueling a majority to agree with the sentiment that “people have failed to take care of the planet.”

They’re been taught to lose their shit over a minor 1.6F increase in global temperatures since 1850, and never exposed to data or the historical records from previous Holocene warm periods. They been indoctrinated into not looking.

“Young people in America are struggling emotionally and psychologically with the effects of climate change,” co-author Lise Van Susteren wrote in the study’s press release. “They are afraid and angry and doubting their future prospects. As we decry the mental health crisis in America’s youth, and search for answers to address it, this survey helps to spotlight climate change as a significant source of distress,” she added, explaining that elected officials play a role.

The US needs to invest in mental health facilities that do deprogramming. Of course, the government is one of the biggest purveyors of the cult scam, which is way worse than Scientology, Branch Davidians, and others. At least they didn’t try and force people to join.

But the youth is most concerned in these 5 places:

  1. Connecticut and Rhode Island
  2. Texas
  3. Massachusetts
  4. New Jersey
  5. Washington

And least concerned

  1. Nebraska, North Dakota, and South Dakota
  2. Arkansas
  3. Alabama
  4. Mississippi
  5. South Carolina

It’s surprising that Texas is so high, but, Democrats have worked hard to get uber-leftists into the state and into teaching positions, which lean uber-left to start with. But, only 30.7% are extremely worried, as compared California which is 32.3%. California is #8 on the list. Florida is also in the top 10, but, only 27.8 are extremely worried.

Of course, the Lancet never bothered to ask “Have you changed your lives to accord with your climate beliefs? Stopped using fossil fuels?” The Lancet is also the organization which came up with the horrendous and shoddy study on how many died during the 2003 Iraq war.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

16 Responses to “Bummer: Gen Z Indoctrinated Into Have Climate (scam) Anxiety”

  1. L.G.Brandon!, L.G.Brandon! says:

    The very first thing they should be taught is the whole thing is a scam. Fossil fuels do not com from fossils rather they come from dead marine plants and animal biomass that lived millions of years before dinosaurs. It’s all bullshit lies like everything the left peddles from sex to EV’s to gender. Lies, all lies.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      If your argument is that global warming is a scam because fossil fuels don’t come from fossils, your argument is weak. You correctly state that fossil fuels came from plants and from marine organisms.

      The Earth continues to warm and the most likely reason is from CO2 added to our atmosphere from burning coal, oil and natural gas.


      Fossil (adjective)

      : preserved from a past geologic age

      : being or resembling a fossil

      Fossil (noun)

      : a remnant, impression, or trace of an organism of past geologic ages that has been preserved in the earth’s crust

      : a person whose views are outmoded

      : something (such as a theory) that has become rigidly fixed

  2. H says:

    Bummer
    Biden War on Energy total scam as US oil production hits another all time record high.

    US oil producers get chubbies, because all that oil is sold at the world market rate, doesn’t help domestic prices

    • Jl says:

      Good catch, Johnny. That Brandon fellow isn’t very competent at the some of the things he said he’d do..

  3. H says:

    1.6 F since 1850
    But Teach always seems to forget that 2/3 of that temp rise has occured within the last 50 years. Teach never liked calculus and just wants to run and hide when “rate of change” is mentioned
    The temp increase has averaged . 1F per decade over the last 160 years BUT
    over the last 20 years that ride now shows . 35F per case. The temps are now increasing 350% faster than over the time period that Mr Teach choose to cherry pick
    How about that Mr Teach why aren’t you concerned about the CURRENT rate of increase?

    • Jl says:

      Good job, Johnny, but it’s not the rate of increase that matters, but the alleged effects from the rate increase that would matter.
      Hence, most alarmists stop at “it’s warming!” or “look how fast it’s warming!”.

      • Elwood P. Dowd says:

        Jill,

        You are making progress! You and other deniers previously denied that it was warming. Now you readily admit that. Now you seem to accept that the rate of warming is increasing.

        But any effects from warming are “alleged”. We already see shifts in plant, animal, bacteria and virus distribution. Droughts, heatwaves, wildfires, dropping ocean pH… and an increasing global population is superimposed on this.

        Let’s say the scientists are correct and the warming rate will be 0.2°C/decade (assuming the rate of change does not increase!!)… Let’s see, that adds another 1.5°C to the current 1°C bringing us to 2.5°C or 4°F. Let’s hope that the Earth’s rate of warming doesn’t increase even more!!

        • Jl says:

          Nice try again, J. Never said no warming, just the cause and the amount. You’re like Johnny with his “Trumps permanent tax cuts for the elites” BS.
          ‘“Droughts, heat waves, wildfires, ocean PH…” Yes, and all those happened before with lesser CO2. And besides, I believe, heatwaves, even the IPCC says those listed no worse. And again, correlation doesn’t equal causation
          “And an increasing global population…”. Yes, the population increasing is great evidence of the gravity of the situation…sorta like the polar bears, right?

          • Elwood P. Dowd says:

            Jill,

            I could have been another Jl. But one Jl used to claim the climate scientists were faking or cooking the data. Global warming is not directly related to Trump’s tax cuts. ?

            You’re confused. The increasing global population is an added stressor.

  4. Doom and Gloom says:

    Too Good to pass up. This is mind blowing.

    IT’S A MUST-WATCH YOUTUBE VIDEO.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UhA_L6C2Lo

    In 1896 a government employee wrote three books called the BARON TRUMP COLLECTION. In it he wrote a tale of the last US PRESIDENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF AMERICA WAS BARON TRUMP’S FATHER…..LOLOLOLOL….Trumps son obviously is BARON TRUMP.

  5. Jl says:

    I see-so, say, increasing numbers of polar bears are “increasing the stressor” rather than being an indication of the cluelessness of some of the cult’s predictions? Got it.

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      Are you a total idiot or just another right-wing asshole? WTF? Polar bears?

      No, you do not see. The HUMAN population is increasing and that is an added stressor to all the Earth’s problems, even independent of global warming.

      Polar bears exist in some two dozen separate populations, some increasing, some decreasing. The gross population is not increasing. Arctic sea ice is decreasing.

      Please show your false data on polar bear numbers over time and we can discuss.

      • Jl says:

        “Are you a total idiot or just another right-wing asshole?” Oh, my-J’s getting quite irritated. Not surprisingly, none of what you said refuted my post. “Human population increasing added stressor”. And lessening sea ice was supposed to be a stressor on polar bears, the past poster child for “climate change”. Wrangle Island is just one place that’s been studied. In 2007, 550-600 bears (Ovsyanikov 2010). 2012, 200-300 bears (Ovsyanikov 2015). 2017, 589 bears (Regehr 2017). 2020, 747 bears (Regehr 2021). “Some increasing, some decreasing”. Yes, so a perfect example of the cluelessness of some of the alarmist’s predictions.

  6. Andrew says:

    when in the history of the earth did the climate not change

    • Elwood P. Dowd says:

      True. The Earth’s overall climate has always been changing! That said, it’s been stable for about the last 12,000 years (Holocene epoch), coincidentally the same time period when human population increased from a few MILLION to now over 8 BILLION and went from hunter-gatherer clans to building immense civilizations.

      Today, the Earth’s average global surface temperature is the highest in the Holocene and is continuing to increase. Some argue that this increase is a good thing, most scientists disagree.

      Why is the Earth warming? By far the most likely explanation is from the addition of greenhouse gases to our atmosphere. The increase in CO2 comes from we humans burning fossil fuels (coal, oil, gas).

Pirate's Cove