Warmists Are Very Upset People Have Free Speech On Social Media

See, everything that does not conform to doomsday cult doctrine is “misinformation”

Social Media Is a Growing Vehicle for Climate Misinformation

Green Climate Thought PoliceA few weeks ago, delegates from nearly 200 nations met for the 29th United Nations climate summit (COP29) in Azerbaijan, where they discussed how best to reduce emissions to slow dangerous global warming. Meanwhile, a separate global forum was playing out online, dedicated to undermining the conference, promoting oil and gas and denying humans’ role in climate change.

new report, published on Friday by international nonprofit Global Witness, found that climate misinformation and disinformation spread unchecked on TikTok during COP29, mostly in user comments on videos. The users they identified denied man-made global warming and rebuked efforts to combat it, claiming that climate change is a “lie” or “hoax.”

Again, would those be the 40,000+ who took fossil fueled trips? You know they did not bike or walk there, and taking the train would be extremely arduous. If the current warm period is mostly/solely caused by mankind then why did all these people take fossil fueled trips? Anyway, how dare you peasants have the ability to speak your mind!

In recent years, social media platforms like X, Facebook and even LinkedIn have emerged as efficient vehicles to spread this type of inaccurate rhetoric as quickly as climate-fueled wildfires. Online influencers and prominent political figures, particularly President-elect Donald Trump, have fanned these flames on social media, a worrisome trend as trust in science and journalists continues in some communities to plummet, experts say.

It couldn’t be, bare with me here, that cult scientists have shown themselves to be in the tank for the cult, that their “findings” are more like Madam Zelda reading your palm, and that most of their prognostications fail, right? That pretty much everything they predict is utter doom, and it helps get them more government money, meaning this is government propaganda, right?

This tracks with my colleague Bob Berwyn’s recent reporting from the conference, during which U.N. officials launched an initiative to combat climate misinformation at an international scale. Berwyn pointed out that after Elon Musk bought Twitter (now X) in 2022, the tech mogul reinstated accounts that had been banned for spreading disinformation about climate and other topics. Since then, the number of accounts amplifying climate denial have proliferated, with high-profile users reaching millions of people per post.

Government that won’t let you have your say and tries to shut those guilty of Wrongthink down are what kinds of governments? If the climate cult’s “science” is so weak that they cannot rebut people with scientific facts than maybe this is a cult, not a science.

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed

9 Responses to “Warmists Are Very Upset People Have Free Speech On Social Media”

  1. Elwood P Dowd says:

    Marine emissions of methanethiol increase aerosol cooling in the Southern Ocean

    https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.adq2465

    Ocean-emitted dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a major source of climate-cooling aerosols. However, most of the marine biogenic sulfur cycling is not routed to DMS but to methanethiol (MeSH), another volatile whose reactivity has hitherto hampered measurements. … Accounting for MeSH emissions reduces the radiative bias of current climate models in this climatically relevant region (Southern Ocean).

    • James Lewis says:

      Chickie Little Man

      The robust statistical predictors

      I predict that you don’t have the vaguest what is predicted.

      • Elwood P Dowd says:

        Choo-Choo,

        You didn’t read the article, did you, you sucker. It predicts that global warming isn’t as bad as believed.

  2. Dana says:

    There’s plenty of stuff on Twitter, but I haven’t seen anything slamming global warming climate change legislation or plans or proposals on Bluesky.

  3. Dana says:

    I guess that Kamala Emhoff had something about her global warming climate change fighting proposals, buried somewhere in her campaign website, but she sure didn’t stress such programs on the campaign trail.

    Why? Because she knew that they would be vote losers far more than vote winners. Very few of the Democrats ran on such proposals.

    • Professor Hale says:

      And because she was already doing all those things and they were demonstrated to be nothing more than corrupt payoffs to activist groups and connected people.

  4. Jl says:

    Upset at free speech on social media? The scientific method in action…

  5. anon says:

    What did they expect, holding that summit in an country so closely aligned with OPEC…

    Also, nice twist on ‘bear with me’…

Pirate's Cove