Democrat Senators Want Transgender “Care” Ban Removed From Defense Bill

Of course they do. But, what they want removed isn’t for active duty soldiers: it’s something more nefarious. Evil, even?

Democratic senators seek to ax transgender care ban from defense bill

Fourteen Democratic senators will introduce an amendment Monday evening to remove language from Congress’ massive defense spending bill that seeks to ban coverage of gender-affirming care for transgender children of service members, the office of Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., told NBC News.

The 1,800-page National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, passed the House last week by a vote of 281-140, with 200 Republicans and 81 Democrats voting “yes,” and 124 Democrats and 16 Republicans voting “no.” The $895 billion bill authorizes the annual budget for the Defense Department and sets defense policies for the upcoming year.

The group of 14 senators, led by Baldwin — who will be the Senate’s sole LGBTQ member in the new term — is seeking to remove a provision tucked into the bill that would prohibit “medical treatment for military dependents under the age of 18 who are diagnosed with gender dysphoria” under the military’s health care program, Tricare.

“Let’s be clear: we’re talking about parents who are in uniform serving our country who have earned the right to make the best decisions for their families. I trust our servicemembers and their doctors to make the best healthcare decisions for their kids, not politicians,” Baldwin said in a statement. “Our amendment would protect military families’ right to make their own decisions and access sometimes lifesaving care for their children.”

Evil. These Democrats want to make sure kids are continuing to be brainwashed into this growing cult, and have their lives destroyed to make sure they are good little Democratic Party voters. If these military members want their kids to go through this stuff, let them pay for it, not the taxpayers. What really should happen is the parent or parents be arrested and charged with felony child abuse.

Related, there’s a lot of confusing as to whom the wackjob school shooter Monday was. A few say a MTF gender confused, way more say FTM gender confused, then you have Andy Ngo, whom I trust a lot

The teen girl used the name “Sam” online and the username “crossixir.” She had an extensive online obsession with school shooters and death, particularly the 1999 Columbine High School shooting. Rupnow was a big fan of the KMFDM rock band, which was also referenced by one of the Columbine shooters. (She often wore the shirt of the band.)

Rupnow’s online friends identified the X account, which purported to belong to the shooter, soon after news broke of the shooting. The account’s last post is of an “okay” hand symbol in the school’s bathroom by the library minutes before the shooting.

But, Natalie was using Sam and crossixir, as well as they/them pronouns online, so, there was some adult/fad driven mental illness. Interestingly, the police refuse to release any information on the shooter. It’s interesting how in some cases that happens, eh?

Save $10 on purchases of $49.99 & up on our Fruit Bouquets at 1800flowers.com. Promo Code: FRUIT49
If you liked my post, feel free to subscribe to my rss feeds.

Post a Comment or Leave a Trackback

19 Responses to “Democrat Senators Want Transgender “Care” Ban Removed From Defense Bill”

  1. Dana says:

    Minors cannot consent to sex, and their parents cannot consent for them, but the Democrats think that they should be able to consent to a sex change?

    Think about it: in most cases, sex lasts less than an hour — less than a minute in the case of Missourians — and then it’s over. It may have lasting repercussions, such as a knockeduptancy, but the left want unregulated prenatal infanticide to take care of that.

    A sex change? Depending upon how far along in the process the ‘change’ has proceeded, the repercussions can last a lifetime, and be irreversible.

    • Elwood P Dowd says:

      Aw, Kentucky – where men are men, and the sheep are scared!

      The ‘left’ does not want unregulated abortion. In fact, the limits of Roe v Wade WERE regulations. The ‘right’ want forced birth, that is, forcing a 10 year old girl to deliver the children of uncle Cletus.

      It’s unlikely that low-IQ red state politicians know children better than parents or treating physicians.

      Studies demonstrate that liberals are more intelligent than conservatives. Even conservatives are smart enough to realize this and it’s why they’re pissed off and violent.

      • CarolAnn says:

        Nothing demonstrates that “liberals are more intelligent than conservatives” than your statement: The ‘right’ want forced birth, that is, forcing a 10 year old girl to deliver the children of uncle Cletus. LOL

        Those self serving lies lost you the last election. Are you shooting to lose the next?

        Abortion is settled policy. The abortion laws are up to the states and the people where they should have been all along. You really hate when “democracy” works.

        • Elwood P Dowd says:

          CarolAnn,

          Missourians just voted to permit abortions, but the ‘democratically’ elected Repubicun legislature here is working to disable the will of the voters.

          Several years ago, Missourians voted to expand Medicaid, but the Repubicuns blocked that as well, but only until the MO Supreme Court overruled them.

          The elections you should worry about next are those for the House in 2026. You’re a mild recession, a measles epidemic or child separation policy from a MAGA bloodbath (and not the one you desire).

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Anything Rimjob spouts is nonsense.
            MAGA bloodbath!!!
            (Retard is so dramatic).

            Bwaha! Lolgfy Loser!
            MAGA47 Motherfucker!

          • CarolAnn says:

            We don’t need to worry about any elections at this point. WE know you’re wishing for a destructive event to harm America and therefore hurt MAGA but that just proves your loyalty to communism rather than the US. Recessions, epidemics and “child separation” can hurt either side, especially the side that failed so miserably before.

            I don’t know what Missourians have “voted for” nor am I going to take your lying word for it and I’m too lazy to research it. But curiosity requires how Missourians can allow a state court to overrule their elections? Once again the democommies rule by lawfare rather than their beloved “democracy”.

            All you do is lie.

          • Elwood P Dowd says:

            CarolAnn,

            Mr Trump is more than likely to deliver the destructive event in the form of a recession, high unemployment, uncontrolled inflation, trade wars, shooting wars, national emergency, another pandemic, lawfare sweeping up opponents etc. He has any number of these on his plste. It’s what Repubicuns do. What’s the over-under on declaring a national emergency?

            You either lied or misunderstood.

            Them Missouri Supreme Court overruled the odious Repubicun legislature here, not the voters. The Court reaffirmed what the voters wanted.

            Madam, you might try doing some of your own research!! LOL.

          • drowningpuppies says:

            Rimjob: Mr Trump is more than likely to deliver the destructive event in the form of a recession, high unemployment, uncontrolled inflation, trade wars, shooting wars, national emergency, another pandemic, lawfare sweeping up opponents etc.

            Of course Rimjob has no basis for his idiotic claims.
            Such stupidity.

          • Elwood P Dowd says:

            CarolAnn,

            It’s easiest (and most comforting) for those who wish to remain close-minded to call anything and everything with which they disagree, a “lie”.

      • Dana says:

        We have for more cattle than sheep, but what we really raise are the greatest horses in the world!

      • Dana says:

        The distinguished Mr Dowd wrote:

        Studies demonstrate that liberals are more intelligent than conservatives. Even conservatives are smart enough to realize this and it’s why they’re pissed off and violent.

        Dude, you can’t even distinguish between males and females, and you’re trying to tell us that you are the smart ones?

  2. Doom and Gloom says:

    Those service members who are willing to butcher their own children don’t need to be in the military to begin with. Lets start with tossing those service members who are whining about their kids being trans instead.

    I 1000 percent agree with Pete Hegseth. The military’s sole function is to prepare to inflict mass casualties on the bad guys(as is determined by the US Congress, who must declare war). All over the world, people are amazed at how hard Americans have fought in any battle they have ever been in.

    Attempting to change that culture of our military is national suicide and Trans in the military is just beyond ludicrous. Paying for their transition even more so.

  3. Dana says:

    Of course, perhaps we should allow gender transition of minors: removing the ability of the mentally ill to reproduce will eventually have positive effects for society.

    It’s just like the ‘sex strike,’ the ‘4B’ reaction of the Harridans for Harris: if they refuse sex, they won’t get knocked up, and thus won’t reproduce, thus improving the aggregate mental health of all Americans. Kind of a shame, though, because what most of them really, really need most is to just get laid, by conservative men who know how to do it.

    • Elwood P Dowd says:

      Mr Dana has been misled in believing there are significant numbers of transgendered Americans.

      There are no doubt many more neurotic nacissists like Trump and Musk sharing their sperm with the women they fancy. How many more asshole billionaires does the US need? Musk believes he’s doing the world a favor creating more Elon mini-me’s! He actually said that!

      We’re sure thare are women lining up to be sexually abused by Trump, Hegseth, RFK Jr and Elon. If they’re so desirable why must they assault women? It saves time.

      • L'Roy White says:

        Always good to hear you say something nice about people you don’t know. Democommies set up entire islands to rape and pillage their women and children. Ditty does it anywhere and they all go for volume. But if one of our guys touches a woman Elwood treats him like Bill Clinton a serial rapist. It’s amusing to watch Elwood twist and turn to distract us from all the murders and rapes perpetrated by leftists in blue cities. Look, a squirrel.

  4. Doom and Gloom says:

    ON another note regarding the military.

    Lets talk the Pentagon and DRONES.

    I have learned something disconcerting, to say the least.

    The Pentagon requested 300 million for ANTI-drone Technology development in 2020, but it was denied. Further requests were also turned down.

    This year, the Pentagon requested 400 million for Anti-Drone Technology, and so far, silence.

    As a result, a few months back, drones began showing up over air force bases. Now, there is a rash of drones all over NJ and elsewhere.

    Sources are 1000 percent convinced AGA is involved. AGA means another government agency within the parlance of the government. During this most recent crisis of drone warfare over American skies, all the agencies are pointing fingers at each other, and the Government itself is remaining SILENT.

    This is nothing more than the Pentagon pointing out in real time how dangerous drones can be. This is why a month or so back, I said I had changed my mind on funding Ukraine for their war with Russia. Using Ukraine as an R&D project is much better than encountering what Russia rolled into, losing 30,000 vehicles and upwards of 100,000 troops to 500-dollar drones carrying a 1 or 2-pound bomb.

    On another note, drones are being developed with a single bullet in the nose of the Drone. These drones can be flown into people…..the bullet goes off, and voila, you are dead. Someone can kill the president while he stands on a stage, giving a speech by someone operating a drone from a mile away.

    Drones have got to be regulated as weapons of war and banned to the general public.

    • Professor Hale says:

      Doom,
      Drones may be weapons of war, or they may be toys, or they may be very useful survey tools, or they may be search and rescue devices. Just like one man’s .22LR bolt gun is a weapon of war to some and just a fun afternoon to others. The Russians themselves have identified over 100 different variants of “drone” in use in Ukraine. There is no need to ban remote control toys just because someone somewhere might abuse them.

      I can tell you for a fact that your information about DoD is wrong. The services in DoD have been investing in CUAS (anti-drone) every year for the past 8 years. This technology is changing so fast that no one can afford to sit on the sidelines for too long. We estimate that drone technology in Ukraine is changing every 3 months.

      • Doom and Gloom says:

        For a fact? Professor?

        You are sitting in on the intell briefings?

        I was wondering when someone would throw the 2A argument at me calling for the ban of drones by the GENERAL PUBLIC. These drones are not toys that are flying around the skies right now. Most being described as Huge with 5-6 food wingspans. That is hardly a toy and could easily bring down a boeing 777 or take out Air force one.

        These are not toys flying over the skies right now. I have seen those types and they struggle to carry a go pro…..the Ukranians are now mounting machine guns on their drones and attacking Russian helicopters.

        So while I mostly agree with what you post, I must respectfully disagree that these drones are TOYS….and incidently the drones that use a bullet in the nose are exactly toys no bigger than 1 foot in diameter.

  5. wildman says:

    amazing what people will do for campaign contributions.

Leave a Reply

Pirate's Cove